scholarly journals A Nomogram Based on the Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Predicts the Prognosis of Patients With Distal Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Li ◽  
Zhenhua Lu ◽  
Zhen Sun ◽  
Xiaolei Shi ◽  
Zhe Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Tnm Staging ◽  
Distal Cholangiocarcinoma ◽  
Tnm Staging System ◽  
Log Odds ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
Positive Lymph Nodes

Background: Lymph node (LN) metastasis is considered one of the most important risk factors affecting the prognosis of distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC). This study aimed to demonstrate the superiority of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) compared with other LN stages, and to establish a novel prognostic nomogram to predict the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of DCC.Methods: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, the data of 676 patients after DCC radical operation were screened, and patients were randomly divided into training (n = 474) and validation sets (n = 474). The prognostic evaluation performance of the LODDS and American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) N stage and lymph node ratio (LNR) were compared using the Akaike information criteria, receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC), and C-index. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to screen independent risk factors, and a LODDS-based nomogram prognostic staging model was established. The nomogram's precision was verified by C-index, calibration curves, and AUC, and the results were compared with those of the AJCC TNM staging system.Results:Compared with the other two stages of LN metastasis, LODDS was most effective in predicting CSS in patients with DCC. Multivariate analysis proved that LODDS, histologic grade, SEER historic stage, and tumor size were independent risk factors for DCC. The C-index of the nomogram, based on the above factors, in the validation set was 0.663. The 1-, 3-, and 5-y AUCs were 0.735, 0.679, and 0.745, respectively. Its good performance was also verified by calibration curves. In addition, the C-index and Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the nomogram performed better than the AJCC TNM staging system.Conclusion:For postoperative patients with DCC, the LODDS stage yielded better prognostic efficiency than the AJCC N and LNR stages. Compared with the AJCC TNM staging system, the nomogram, based on the LODDS, demonstrated superior performance.

The tumor-log odds of positive lymph nodes-metastasis staging system, a new staging system for gastric cancer after D2 resection in China.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14655-e14655
Author(s):  
Rui-hua Xu ◽  
Miao-zhen Qiu
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Tnm Staging ◽  
Cut Points ◽  
Tnm System ◽  
Prognostic Assessment ◽  
Log Odds ◽  
Positive Lymph Nodes

e14655 Background: In this study, we established a hypothetical tumor-lodds-metastasis (TLM) and tumor-ratio-metastasis (TRM) staging system. Moreover we compared them with the 7th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-nodes-metastasis (AJCC TNM) staging system in gastric cancer patients after D2 resection. Methods: A total of 1000 gastric carcinoma patients receiving treatment in our center were selected for the analysis. Finally, 730 patients who received D2 resection were retrospectively studied. Patients were staged using the TLM, TRM and the 7th edition AJCC TNM system. Survival analysis was performed with a Cox regression model. We used two parameters to compare the TNM, TRM and TLM staging system, the -2log likelihood and the hazard ratio. Results: The cut points of lymph node ratio (LNR) were set as 0, 0-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-1.0. And for the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), the cut points were established as≤-0.5, -0.5-0, 0-0.5, >0.5. There were significant differences in survival among patients in different LODDS classifications for each pN or LNR groups. When stratified by the LODDS classifications, the prognosis was highly homologous between those in the according pN or LNR classifications. Multivariate analysis shown that TLM staging system was better than the TRM or TNM system for the prognostic evaluation. Conclusions: The TLM systems was superior to the TRM or TNM system for prognostic assessment of gastric adenocarcinoma patients after D2 resection.

scholarly journals Log odds of positive lymph nodes is prognostically equivalent to lymph node ratio in non-metastatic colon cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Riaz Baqar ◽  
Simon Wilkins ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Karen Oliva ◽  
Paul McMurrick
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Lymph Node Ratio ◽  
Metastatic Colon Cancer ◽  
Node Ratio ◽  
Log Odds ◽  
Positive Lymph Nodes

Rhabdomyosarcoma: the Stanford experience using a TNM staging system.

1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 370-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
T J Pedrick ◽  
S S Donaldson ◽  
R S Cox
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Tnm Staging ◽  
Actuarial Survival ◽  
Entire Study ◽  
Histologic Subtype ◽  
Tnm System ◽  
T Stage ◽  
Tnm Staging System ◽  
Extent Of Disease

Seventy-four patients with rhabdomyosarcoma were initially staged according to the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) grouping classification and then retrospectively using a TNM staging system based on the initial clinical extent of disease. The TNM system includes T1, tumor confined to site or organ of origin; T2, regional extension beyond the site of origin; N0, normal lymph nodes; N1, lymph nodes containing tumor; M0, no evidence of metastases; and M1, distant metastases. All patients received combination chemotherapy, and more than 90% received radiation therapy as part of their initial treatment program with curative intent. Fifty-three of 74 patients (72%) were group III according to the IRS system, indicating unresectable or gross residual tumor. A more uniform distribution was achieved using the TNM system. Freedom from relapse (FFR) was 43% and the actuarial survival rate was 47% for the entire study group at 10 years. All but one relapse occurred within 3 years of initial diagnosis, and only three of 38 relapsed patients were salvaged. All TNM stage I patients are surviving disease free. Among patients having stages II, III, and IV disease by the TNM system, FFR was 53%, 26%, and 11%, and the survival rates were 47%, 36%, and 33%, respectively. Thirty-two of 74 patients (43%) had evidence of lymph node involvement at presentation, and 28 (88%) of these had primary lesions that extended beyond the site of origin (T2 primary). Histologic subtype and primary site had little impact on outcome in a multivariate analysis, and T stage was identified as the single most significant covariate correlated with survival; a model composed of both T stage and M stage was the best one for predicting relapse. The presented data support a study using a prospectively assigned TNM staging system based on the initial clinical extent of disease for use in future therapeutic trials.

Role of adjuvant therapy after R0 resection for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 355-355
Author(s):  
Young Saing Kim ◽  
In Gyu Hwang ◽  
Song-ee Park ◽  
Eun Young Kim ◽  
Jung Hun Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Distal Cholangiocarcinoma ◽  
Positive Lymph Nodes

355 Background: There is still debated regarding the optimal treatment strategy in cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection. The aim of this study was to analyze the role of adjuvant therapy in R0-resected distal cholangiocarcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent R0 resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma between January 2001 and December 2013 at six cancer centers in Korea. Adjuvant therapy consisted of chemotherapy (CT), chemoradiotherapy (CRT), or radiotherapy (RT). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 158 patients were included in the analysis; 47 patients (29.7%) had lymph node involvement. Fifty-six patients (35.4%) received adjuvant therapy (CT/CRT/RT: 27/20/9, respectively). Patients with advanced TNM stage (p = 0.001), T3/T4 disease (p = 0.009), positive lymph nodes (p = 0.052) and elevated CA 19-9 (p = 0.071) were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy. The effect of adjuvant therapy varied according to the treatment modality. Multivariable analysis showed a significant improvement in OS with CRT (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.83, p = 0.024) and CT (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.53, p = 0.001). However, RT alone was associated with shorter OS (HR 2.38, p = 0.040), along with T3/T4 disease (HR 2.12, p = 0.012) and positive lymph nodes (HR 2.30, p = 0.008). In the subset analysis according to lymph node status, adjuvant therapy not including RT alone was associated with a significant OS advantage both in node-negative patients (median, 103.3 vs. 54.9 months, p = 0.037) and node-positive patients (not reached vs. 22.6 months, p = 0.013). Conclusions: Our results showed that patients receiving adjuvant CT or CRT had significant improvement in OS. In addition, the benefit of adjuvant therapy (except RT alone) was observed even in patients with negative lymph nodes.

scholarly journals The Role of Lymph Node Dissection in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. 

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanjie Hu ◽  
Gang Xu ◽  
Shunda Du ◽  
Zhiwen Luo ◽  
Hong Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Positive Surgical Margin ◽  
Node Dissection ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

Abstract BackgroundLymph node dissection (LND) is of great significance in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Although the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend routine LND in ICC, the effects of LND remains controversial. This study aimed to explore the role and application of LND in ICC.MethodsPatients were identified in two Chinese academic centers. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to reduce bias. Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).ResultsOf 232 patients, 177 (76.3%) underwent LND, and 71 (40.1%) had metastatic lymph nodes. A minimum of 6 lymph nodes were dissected in 66 patients (37.3%). LND did not improve the prognosis of ICC. LNM >3 may have worse OS and DFS than LNM 1-3, especially in the LND >=6 group. For nLND patients, the adjuvant treatment group had better OS and DFS.ConclusionsCA 19-9, CEA, operative time, positive surgical margin, and T stage were independent risk factors for OS; CEA and differentiation were independent risk factors for DFS. LND has no definite predictive effect on prognosis. Patients with 4 or more LNMs may have a worse prognosis than patients with 1-3 LNMs. Adjuvant therapy may benefit patients of nLND.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document