scholarly journals In a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Cross-Over Study, Administration of 6 and 12 G Fortetropin® Does Not Reduce Serum Myostatin in Healthy Adult Dogs Over 72-Hours

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmella C. Nugent Britt ◽  
Leilani X. Alvarez ◽  
Kenneth Lamb

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a single administration of 6 and 12 g of Fortetropin compared to placebo on serum myostatin in healthy, adult dogs over a 72-h period.Methods: Prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Ten hospital-employee-owned healthy adult dogs aged 2 to 8 years old were enrolled in the study. Blood samples were collected prior to and then 12-, 24-, 36-, 48-, and 72-h following administration of the test agent (6 and 12 g) or placebo. Serum samples were processed according to manufacturer's guidelines for canine serum using GDF-8/Myostatin Quantikine ELISA kit (R&D Systems). Analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) analyses were carried out where P < 0.05 was deemed significant.Results: Mean serum myostatin was not significantly lower in treatment groups of either low or high dose compared to placebo at any time point. Baseline mean serum myostatin in low and high dose treatment groups was 29,481 (SD = 5,224) and 32,214 pg/mL (SD = 7,353), respectively. Placebo group low and high dose baseline mean serum myostatin was 30,247 (SD = 5,875) and 28,512 (SD = 5,028).Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that administration of single 6 or 12 g dose of Fortetropin does not reduce serum myostatin in healthy adult dogs over a 72-h period.Clinical Importance: Oral supplements, like Fortetropin, require further studies to determine the efficacy and bioavailability in order to guide clinical use in dogs.

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 668-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert R. Conley ◽  
Deanna L. Kelly ◽  
Charles M. Richardson ◽  
Carol A. Tamminga ◽  
William T. Carpenter

Dermatology ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 193 (4) ◽  
pp. 324-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Zuberbier ◽  
C. Münzberger ◽  
U. Haustein ◽  
E. Trippas ◽  
B. Burtin ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 393-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deanna L. Kelly ◽  
Charles M. Richardson ◽  
Yang Yu ◽  
Robert R. Conley

1984 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 782-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
S M Grunberg ◽  
K V Gala ◽  
M Lampenfeld ◽  
D Jamin ◽  
K Johnson ◽  
...  

Metoclopramide is an effective antiemetic for cisplatin-induced vomiting when given in parenteral high-dose regimens but not oral low-dose regimens. Metoclopramide was compared to haloperidol, also given in a high-dose parenteral regimen. Patients received two cycles of cisplatin at a dose greater than or equal to 70 mg/m2. Metoclopramide (2 mg/kg intravenous) was given every two hours for five doses beginning one half hour before cisplatin. Haloperidol (3 mg intravenous) was given on the same schedule. A randomized double-blind crossover design was used to control subjective bias and to compare the same patient's experiences. Twenty-eight patients completed both study arms. Excellent control of vomiting was achieved with both drugs. Metoclopramide resulted in 1.92 vomiting episodes (range, 0-5) with 36% having no vomiting. Haloperidol resulted in 3.04 vomiting episodes (range, 0-8) with 20% having no vomiting. Significantly fewer vomiting episodes were noted with metoclopramide rho = .006, paired sign test). However, responses to the two drugs were well correlated (Spearman's rho = .39, P = .03). Metoclopramide and haloperidol are both excellent antiemetics when given in sufficient dosage by an effective route. Metoclopramide does show a mild advantage. However, the positive correlation in response to these agents suggests a common mechanism of action. The ability to identify related antiemetics will be useful in the design of rational combination antiemetic therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document