scholarly journals Conceptual Design of a Novel Nozzle Combined with a Clinical Proton Linac for Magnetically Focussed Minibeams

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 4657
Author(s):  
Tim Schneider ◽  
Annalisa Patriarca ◽  
Alberto Degiovanni ◽  
Manuel Gallas ◽  
Yolanda Prezado

(1) Background: Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic approach with the potential to significantly increase normal tissue sparing while providing tumour control equivalent or superior to standard proton therapy. For reasons of efficiency, flexibility and minibeam quality, the optimal implementation of pMBRT should use magnetically focussed minibeams which, however, could not yet be generated in a clinical environment. In this study, we evaluated our recently proposed minibeam nozzle together with a new clinical proton linac as a potential implementation. (2) Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine under which conditions minibeams can be generated and to evaluate the robustness against focussing magnet errors. Moreover, an example of conventional pencil beam scanning irradiation was simulated. (3) Results: Excellent minibeam sizes between 0.6 and 0.9 mm full width at half maximum could be obtained and a good tolerance to errors was observed. Furthermore, the delivery of a 10 cm × 10 cm field with pencil beams was demonstrated. (4) Conclusion: The combination of the new proton linac and minibeam nozzle could represent an optimal implementation of pMBRT by allowing the generation of magnetically focussed minibeams with clinically relevant parameters. It could furthermore be used for conventional pencil beam scanning.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-83
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Hyer ◽  
Laura C. Bennett ◽  
Theodore J. Geoghegan ◽  
Martin Bues ◽  
Blake R. Smith

Abstract Purpose The development of collimating technologies has become a recent focus in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy to improve the target conformity and healthy tissue sparing through field-specific or energy-layer–specific collimation. Given the growing popularity of collimators for low-energy treatments, the purpose of this work was to summarize the recent literature that has focused on the efficacy of collimators for PBS and highlight the development of clinical and preclinical collimators. Materials and Methods The collimators presented in this work were organized into 3 categories: per-field apertures, multileaf collimators (MLCs), and sliding-bar collimators. For each case, the system design and planning methodologies are summarized and intercompared from their existing literature. Energy-specific collimation is still a new paradigm in PBS and the 2 specific collimators tailored toward PBS are presented including the dynamic collimation system (DCS) and the Mevion Adaptive Aperture. Results Collimation during PBS can improve the target conformity and associated healthy tissue and critical structure avoidance. Between energy-specific collimators and static apertures, static apertures have the poorest dose conformity owing to collimating only the largest projection of a target in the beam's eye view but still provide an improvement over uncollimated treatments. While an external collimator increases secondary neutron production, the benefit of collimating the primary beam appears to outweigh the risk. The greatest benefit has been observed for low- energy treatment sites. Conclusion The consensus from current literature supports the use of external collimators in PBS under certain conditions, namely low-energy treatments or where the nominal spot size is large. While many recent studies paint a supportive picture, it is also important to understand the limitations of collimation in PBS that are specific to each collimator type. The emergence and paradigm of energy-specific collimation holds many promises for PBS proton therapy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic Leiser ◽  
Gabriele Calaminus ◽  
Robert Malyapa ◽  
Beat Bojaxhiu ◽  
Francesca Albertini ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Brita Singers Sørensen ◽  
Mateusz Krzysztof Sitarz ◽  
Christina Ankjærgaard ◽  
Jacob Johansen ◽  
Claus E Andersen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S447-S448
Author(s):  
B.S. Sørensen ◽  
M.K. Sitarz ◽  
C. Ankjærgaard ◽  
J. Johansen ◽  
C.E. Andersen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng-Ya Guo ◽  
Xiu-Fang Li ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Qi Liu ◽  
Xiu-Zhen Deng ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konrad P. Nesteruk ◽  
Michele Togno ◽  
Martin Grossmann ◽  
Anthony J. Lomax ◽  
Damien C. Weber ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 82 ◽  
pp. 134-143
Author(s):  
M. De Saint-Hubert ◽  
C. De Angelis ◽  
Ž. Knežević ◽  
B. Michalec ◽  
B. Reniers ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document