scholarly journals Regression of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in a Patient-Derived Xenograft Mouse Model by Monoclonal Antibodies against IL-12 p40 Monomer

Cells ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 259
Author(s):  
Madhuchhanda Kundu ◽  
Sumita Raha ◽  
Avik Roy ◽  
Kalipada Pahan

Although some therapies are available for regular breast cancers, there are very few options for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Here, we demonstrated that serum level of IL-12p40 monomer (p40) was much higher in breast cancer patients than healthy controls. On the other hand, levels of IL-12, IL-23 and p40 homodimer (p402) were lower in serum of breast cancer patients as compared to healthy controls. Similarly, human TNBC cells produced greater level of p40 than p402. The level of p40 was also larger than p402 in serum of a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse model. Accordingly, neutralization of p40 by p40 mAb induced death of human TNBC cells and tumor shrinkage in PDX mice. While investigating the mechanism, we found that neutralization of p40 led to upregulation of human CD4+IFNγ+ and CD8+IFNγ+ T cell populations, thereby increasing the level of human IFNγ and decreasing the level of human IL-10 in PDX mice. Finally, we demonstrated the infiltration of human cytotoxic T cells, switching of tumor-associated macrophage M2 (TAM2) to TAM1 and suppression of transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) in tumor tissues of p40 mAb-treated PDX mice. Our studies identify a possible new immunotherapy for TNBC in which p40 mAb inhibits tumor growth in PDX mice.

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12017-e12017
Author(s):  
D. Sener Dede ◽  
S. Aksoy ◽  
N. Bulut ◽  
O. Dizdar ◽  
Z. Arik ◽  
...  

e12017 Background: Cancer antigen 15–3 (CA 15–3) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), are often used in follow up care of breast cancer and provide important clues to the clinicians for disease progression in metastatic and recurrent breast cancer. Triple-negative breast cancers are frequently defined as a single group identifiable using routine clinical tests. They are negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), the so-called triple-negative breast cancers. In this study we compared the tumor markers of triple negative breast cancer and non-triple negative patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed serum CEA and CA 15–3 levels of both triple negative and non-triple negative breast cancer patients at the time of first diagnosis and when they developed metastatic disease. Results: 544 consecutive nonmetastatic breast cancer patients presenting at Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey, with a median age of 49 were evaluated. 15.1% of the patients were triple negative breast cancer. At the time of diagnosis triple negative group had lower serum CEA (2.5 ± 5.9 vs 4.0 ±16.4 p = 0.35) and CA 15–3 (23.7 ± 14.6 vs 37.1 ± 117; p = 0.021) levels compared to non-triple negative group. In patients who developed metastasis during follow up; the CEA (3.2 ± 3.8 vs 29.6 ± 106.4 p = 0.022) and CA15–3 (46.9 ± 46.3 vs 203.2 ± 534 p = 0.008) levels were also significantly lower in triple negative breast cancer group compared to non-triple negative group.In non-triple negative breast cancer patients who developed metastasis, mean serum levels of CEA and CA15–3 significantly increased compared to baseline, whereas in triple negative group who developed metastasis CEA and CA 15–3 levels did not differ significantly. Conclusions: While being a good laboratory parameter in the follow-up of patients with breast cancer metastases, tumor markers may not show the increased tumor burden in the triple-negative breast cancer patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22127-e22127
Author(s):  
J. Tsang ◽  
T. L. Lai ◽  
D. H. Lau ◽  
G. K. Au ◽  
D. T. Chua

e22127 Background: There is increasing data showing that breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease which should be assessed separately in different populations, as it differs substantially between Chinese and Caucasian women. Triple-negative breast tumours which are negative for ER, PR and HER-2 neu receptors are associated with younger age at presentation, tumour of higher grade with larger size and a poorer prognosis. There is recent suggestion that the prognostic outlook of Chinese triple-negative breast cancers might be somewhat different from those in the Western population, but few studies have attempted to understand the role of ethnic factor in the triple-negative entity. Methods: We conducted a preliminary retrospective comparison of 170 Hong Kong Chinese primary breast cancer patients seen as new cases during January 2004 and December 2004 in a teaching hospital. Clinico-pathological features of triple-negative tumours were compared to their non-triple-negative counterpart. Results: Triple negative breast cancer accounted for 12.4% of all breast cancer patients seen in the year of 2004 (n = 21). It is associated with more cancers with grade 3 tumour (68.4% vs 36.8%; p = 0.02) but there was no statistically difference between the age of presentation, tumour size, extensive intraductal component, lymph node status and rate of local relapse or metastasis after adjuvant therapy. Subset analysis further revealed that when triple negative breast cancer patients (n = 21) were compared to the HER-2 positive patients (n = 40) in the studied population, HER-2 positive patients were still associated with higher proportion of node positive disease (57.5% vs 30.0%; p = 0.04). Disease free survival and overall survival were not studied due to limited follow-up time. Conclusions: Our preliminary findings suggested that Hong Kong Chinese triple-negative breast cancers are associated with a more favourable outlook and might behave differently when compared to their Western counterpart. Further large-scale study of the ethnic factor with long-term follow-up is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Breast Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Rudolf Napieralski ◽  
Gabriele Schricker ◽  
Gert Auer ◽  
Michaela Aubele ◽  
Jonathan Perkins ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> PITX2 DNA methylation has been shown to predict outcomes in high-risk breast cancer patients after anthracycline-based chemotherapy. To determine its prognostic versus predictive value, the impact of PITX2 DNA methylation on outcomes was studied in an untreated cohort vs. an anthracycline-treated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cohort. <b><i>Material and Methods:</i></b> The percent DNA methylation ratio (PMR) of paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) was determined by a validated methylation-specific real-time PCR test. Patient samples of routinely collected archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue and clinical data from 144 TNBC patients of 2 independent cohorts (i.e., 66 untreated patients and 78 patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy) were analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The risk of 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) increased continuously with rising PITX2 DNA methylation in the anthracycline-treated population, but it increased only slightly during 10-year follow-up time in the untreated patient population. PITX2 DNA methylation with a PMR cutoff of 2 did not show significance for poor vs. good outcomes (OS) in the untreated patient cohort (HR = 1.55; <i>p</i> = 0.259). In contrast, the PITX2 PMR cutoff of 2 identified patients with poor (PMR &#x3e;2) vs. good (PMR ≤2) outcomes (OS) with statistical significance in the anthracycline-treated cohort (HR = 3.96; <i>p</i> = 0.011). The results in the subgroup of patients who did receive anthracyclines only (no taxanes) confirmed this finding (HR = 5.71; <i>p</i> = 0.014). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In this hypothesis-generating study PITX2 DNA methylation demonstrated predominantly predictive value in anthracycline treatment in TNBC patients. The risk of poor outcome (OS) correlates with increasing PITX2 DNA methylation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S43-S44
Author(s):  
K.S. Harborg ◽  
R. Zachariae ◽  
J. Olsen ◽  
M. Johannsen ◽  
D. Cronin-Fenton ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document