scholarly journals Male Breast Cancer Review. A Rare Case of Pure DCIS: Imaging Protocol, Radiomics and Management

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2199
Author(s):  
Daniele Ugo Tari ◽  
Luigi Morelli ◽  
Antonella Guida ◽  
Fabio Pinto
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Rare Case ◽  
Male Breast ◽  
Diagnostic Model ◽  
Architectural Distortion ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Imaging Protocol ◽  
Triple Assessment ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of male breast is a rare lesion, often associated with invasive carcinoma. When the in situ component is present in pure form, histological grade is usually low or intermediate. Imaging is difficult as gynaecomastia is often present and can mask underlying findings. We report a rare case of pure high-grade DCIS in a young male patient, with associated intraductal papilloma and atypical ductal hyperplasia. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) showed an area of architectural distortion at the union of outer quadrants of the left breast without gynaecomastia. Triple assessment suggested performing a nipple-sparing mastectomy, which revealed the presence of a focal area of high-grade DCIS of 2 mm. DCIS, even of high grade, is difficult to detect with mammography and even more rare, especially when associated with other proliferative lesions. DBT with 2D synthetic reconstruction is useful as the imaging step of a triple assessment and it should be performed in both symptomatic and asymptomatic high-risk men to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions. We propose a diagnostic model to early detect breast cancer in men, optimizing resources according to efficiency, effectiveness and economy, and look forward to radiomics as a powerful tool to help radiologists.

scholarly journals Ductal Carcinoma In situ of the Male Breast

Breast Care ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 288-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Brents ◽  
John Hancock
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Nipple Discharge ◽  
Left Breast ◽  
Male Breast ◽  
High Grade

Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast is an unusual lesion and most often associated with invasive carcinoma. On rare occasions when the in situ component is present in pure form, histological grade is almost always low to intermediate. Imaging for these patients is difficult as gynecomastia is often present and can mask underlying calcifications or carcinoma. Case Report: We report a case of pure high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast in a patient with clear nipple discharge. Breast mammography showed bilateral gynecomastia and benign calcifications. Subsequent breast ultrasound showed dilated ducts of the left breast, and a left breast ductogram showed filling defects suggestive of a papilloma. Excisional biopsy and subsequent mastectomy were consistent with high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. Conclusion: Male breast cancer is uncommon and, although there is increasing awareness, it is less studied compared to female breast cancer. With a clinical history of nipple discharge of any kind, further evaluation with imaging should be considered. In males with gynecomastia, it is important to remember that ductal carcinoma in situ, even of high grade, is difficult to detect on mammography and may not be associated with suspicious calcifications.

Male Versus Female Breast Cancers

2003 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Muir ◽  
R. Kanthan ◽  
S. C. Kanthan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Progesterone Receptor ◽  
Male Breast Cancer ◽  
Male Breast ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Receptor Status ◽  
Female Breast ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Context.—The rate of male breast cancer is a small fraction of that observed in females, thus severely limiting our understanding of the pathogenesis of this condition. It remains unclear whether the biological behavior and tumor progression associated with male breast cancer parallel that of the female form. Objectives.—To evaluate the immunohistochemical profile of male breast carcinomas and to compare this profile with that of stage-matched female breast cancers. Design.—Seventy-five cases of primary male breast cancer were identified using the records of the Saskatchewan Cancer Foundation over a period of 26 years (1970–1996). Fifty-nine of these cases had formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks available for the purposes of this study. All cases were reviewed and a standardized modified Bloom-Richardson grading criterion was applied. Estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, c-Erb-B2 expression, p53 expression, and Bcl-2 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Results from 240 consecutive cases of stage-matched female breast cancers analyzed in the same laboratory were used as a standard set for comparison. Results.—Male breast cancers tended to be high grade (85% grade 3) in comparison with the female breast cancers (50% grade 3). In descriptive analysis across all stages of disease, male carcinomas were more frequently estrogen receptor positive (81% vs 69%) than their female counterparts. Despite their high grade, they were less likely to overexpress p53 (9% vs 28%) and Erb-B2 (5% vs 17%) than the female counterparts. There was no significant difference in either progesterone receptor (63% vs 56%) or Bcl-2 (79% vs 76%) overexpression. Stratified analysis by stage-matched controls showed no statistically significant differences among the men and women with stage I disease. However, in stage II–matched samples, statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups. The male cancers were more likely to overexpress estrogen receptor (81.6% vs 64.4%, P = .04), progesterone receptor (71.1% vs 47.5%, P = .01), and Bcl-2 (78.9% vs 69.4%, P = .20). They also showed statistically significant lower expression of p53 (7.9% vs 36.3%, P = .001) and Erb-B2 (5.3% vs 23.8% P = .01). Conclusion.—Male breast cancers display distinct immunophenotypic differences from those occurring in women, implying a different pathogenesis in the evolution and progression of this disease. Such differences may play key roles in therapeutic management, warranting different treatment strategies in comparison to female breast cancers.

Oral and maxillofacial metastasis of male breast cancer: Report of a rare case and literature review

2019 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. e18-e22
Author(s):  
Nathalia de Almeida Freire ◽  
Bruno Augusto Benevenuto de Andrade ◽  
Nathalie Henriques Silva Canedo ◽  
Michelle Agostini ◽  
Mário José Romañach
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Male Breast Cancer ◽  
Rare Case ◽  
Male Breast

A rare case of long term survival in male breast cancer patient

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 140
Author(s):  
AyorindeMobolanle Folasire ◽  
MuhammadInuwa Mustapha ◽  
BabatundeOladapo Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patient ◽  
Breast Cancer Patient ◽  
Male Breast Cancer ◽  
Rare Case ◽  
Male Breast ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Histological Assessment of Breast Lesions Identified Exclusively by Magnetic Resonance

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (10) ◽  
pp. 944-947
Author(s):  
Victoria O'connor ◽  
Elizabeth Arena ◽  
Joslyn Albright ◽  
Nefertiti Brown ◽  
Ryan O'connor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Breast Biopsy ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Significant Family History ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Significant Pathology

Radiologic–pathologic correlation of lesions diagnosed by magnetic resonance (MR) is precluded by insufficient data on histological characteristics of lesions suspicious on MR but not visible on concurrent mammogram or ultrasound. The objective of this study was to describe histological features of breast lesions diagnosed exclusively by MR. The participants underwent MR-guided breast biopsy between 2007 and 2012 for a suspicious lesion not identified by mammography or ultrasound. Histology slides were interpreted retrospectively by a breast pathologist. Of 126 patients (126 lesions), 34 (27%) had new breast cancer, 51 (40.5%) previous breast cancer, and 41 (32.5%) dense breasts or a significant family history of breast cancer. MR identified 23 (18.3%) invasive cancers: 20 were Grade 1 and 17 were ductal. Of the 126 lesions, 16 (13%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), four were atypical ductal hyperplasia and atypical lobular hyperplasia (3%), and 68 (54%) were benign. Fifteen biopsies (12%) had no significant pathology. Five DCIS lesions were upgraded to T1 invasive cancers. Approximately 30 per cent of suspicious lesions detected exclusively by MR are invasive or in situ cancers that are predominantly low grade. Further studies are needed to determine if malignant lesions can be prospectively distinguished by MR characteristics.

scholarly journals Male breast cancer: a rare case of neoplasia in elderly; our experience and review of the literature

BMC Surgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A39
Author(s):  
Stefano Reggio ◽  
Luciano Grimaldi ◽  
Mario Pannullo ◽  
Marco Ferretti ◽  
Rita Compagna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Male Breast Cancer ◽  
Rare Case ◽  
Male Breast ◽  
Review Of The Literature

scholarly journals Sharp Downregulation of Hub Genes Associated With the Pathogenesis of Breast Cancer From Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Wang ◽  
Faqing Liang ◽  
Yuting Zhou ◽  
Juanjuan Qiu ◽  
Qing Lv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Protein Expression ◽  
Invasive Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Cancer Tissue ◽  
Hub Genes ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Cancer Pathogenesis ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia

IntroductionBreast atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are precursor stages of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). This study aimed to investigate the pathogenesis of breast cancer by dynamically analyzing expression changes of hub genes from normal mammary epithelium (NME) to simple ductal hyperplasia (SH), ADH, DCIS, and finally to IDC.MethodsLaser-capture microdissection (LCM) data for NME, SH, ADH, DCIS, and IDC cells were obtained. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to dynamically analyze the gene modules and hub genes associated with the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Tissue microarray, immunohistochemical, and western blot analyses were performed to determine the protein expression trends of hub genes.ResultsTwo modules showed a trend of increasing expression during the development of breast disease from NME to DCIS, whereas a third module displayed a completely different trend. Interestingly, the three modules displayed inverse trends from DCIS to IDC compared with from NME to DCIS; that is, previously upregulated modules were subsequently downregulated and vice versa. We further analyzed the module that was most closely associated with DCIS (p=7e−07). Kyoto Gene and Genomic Gene Encyclopedia enrichment analysis revealed that the genes in this module were closely related to the cell cycle (p= 4.3e–12). WGCNA revealed eight hub genes in the module, namely, CDK1, NUSAP1, CEP55, TOP2A, MELK, PBK, RRM2, and MAD2L1. Subsequent analysis of these hub genes revealed that their expression levels were lower in IDC tissues than in DCIS tissues, consistent with the expression trend of the module. The protein expression levels of five of the hub genes gradually increased from NME to DCIS and then decreased in IDC. Survival analysis predicted poor survival among breast cancer patients if these hub genes were not downregulated from DCIS to IDC.ConclusionsFive hub genes, RRM2, TOP2A, PBK, MELK, and NUSAP1, which are associated with breast cancer pathogenesis, are gradually upregulated from NME to DCIS and then downregulated in IDC. If these hub genes are not downregulated from DCIS to IDC, patient survival is compromised. However, the underlying mechanisms warrant further elucidation in future studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document