scholarly journals SCORE2 Assessment in the Calculation of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2363
Author(s):  
Iván Ferraz-Amaro ◽  
Alfonso Corrales ◽  
Belén Atienza-Mateo ◽  
Nuria Vegas-Revenga ◽  
Diana Prieto-Peña ◽  
...  

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Risk chart algorithms, such as the Systematic Coronary Risk Assessment (SCORE), often underestimate the risk of CVD in patients with RA. In this sense, the use of noninvasive tools, such as the carotid ultrasound, has made it possible to identify RA patients at high risk of CVD who had subclinical atherosclerosis disease and who had been included in the low or moderate CVD risk categories when the SCORE risk tables were applied. The 2003 SCORE calculator was recently updated to a new prediction model: SCORE2. This new algorithm improves the identification of individuals from the general population at high risk of developing CVD in Europe. Our objective was to compare the predictive capacity between the original SCORE and the new SCORE2 to identify RA patients with subclinical atherosclerosis and, consequently, high risk of CVD. 1168 non-diabetic patients with RA and age > 40 years were recruited. Subclinical atherosclerosis was searched for by carotid ultrasound. The presence of carotid plaque and the carotid intima media wall thickness (cIMT) were evaluated. SCORE and SCORE2 were also calculated. The relationships of SCORE and SCORE2 to each other and to the presence of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis were studied. The correlation between SCORE and SCORE2 was found to be high in patients with RA (Spearman’s Rho = 0.961, p < 0.001). Both SCORE (Spearman’s Rho = 0.524) and SCORE2 (Spearman’s Rho = 0.521) were similarly correlated with cIMT (p = 0.92). Likewise, both calculators showed significant and comparable discriminations for the presence of carotid plaque: SCORE AUC 0.781 (95%CI 0.755–0.807) and SCORE2 AUC 0.774 (95%CI 0.748–0.801). Using SCORE, 80% and 20% of the patients were in the low or moderate and high or very high CVD risk categories, respectively. However, when the same categories were evaluated using SCORE2, the percentages were different (58% and 42%, respectively). Consequently, the number of RA patients included in the high or very high CVD risk categories was significantly higher with SCORE2 compared to the original SCORE. (p < 0.001). In conclusion, although predictive capacity for the presence of carotid plaque is equivalent between SCORE and SCORE2, SCORE2 identifies a significantly higher proportion of patients with RA who are at high or very high risk of CVD.

Author(s):  
K. Premanandh ◽  
R. Shankar

Background: Coronary vascular disease (CVD) risk estimation tools are a simple means of identifying those at high risk in a community and hence a potentially cost-effective strategy for CVD prevention in resource-poor countries. The WHO /ISH risk prediction charts provide approximate estimates of cardiovascular disease risk in people who do not have established coronary heart disease, stroke or other atherosclerotic disease.Methods: A total of 280 subjects between 40 to 70 years of age were included in this cross sectional study. Eligible households was selected randomly (every 5th household) for the interview using systematic random sampling. Age, gender, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, presence or absence of diabetes and total serum cholesterol were used to compute the total CVD risk using WHO/ISH CVD risk prediction chart. The chart stratify an individual into low (<10%), moderate (10% to <20%), high (20% to <30%), and very high (>30%) risk groups.Results: Moderate and high CVD risk were 12.14% and 7.5% respectively. Of total study participants, 2.5% had very high risk (>40%). High risk (binge drinking) alcohol drinkers (p=0.04) and abdominal obesity (p=0.0001) were significantly associated with higher CVD risk. Higher prevalence of behavioral risk factors was also reported in our study population.Conclusions: A large proportion of the population is at moderate and high cardiovascular risk. Risk stratification and identification of individuals with a high risk for CHD who could potentially benefit from intensive primary prevention efforts are critically important in reducing the burden of CVD in India.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
İbrahim Topuz ◽  
Sebahat Gozum

Abstract Background Turkey is among the top countries in Europe in coronary mortality in the 45-74 age range. The highest death due to disorders of the circulatory system (50.8%) that is Amasya province. Objective Determine related factors and to compare with actual and perceived cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks of men aged 40-65 living in Amasya. Methods The sample size of cross-sectional and analytical study consisted of 400 people who met the inclusion criteria. Actual CVD risks of men were calculated using HeartScore. Age, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol measured by blood taken from the capillary and smoking status were used to calculate CVD risk. Actual CVD risk in next decade has been calculated as low, medium, high or very high. Perceived CVD risk in next decade were identified by participants as low, medium, high and very high responses. They also questioned why evaluation of perceived risk. Results It was determined whereas 8.3% of the males had high, 52.5% had a very high level of CVD risk. The main variables affecting actual CVD risk; diastolic blood pressure, BMI and physical activity. 13.3% of males perceived CVD risks at high and 8% at very high. The main variables affecting perceived CVD risk; age and DM. It was found that 48% and 23.8% of males perceived CVD risks lower and higher than actual CVD risk while 28.2% were accurate. Those who perceived CVD risk at a moderate, high and very high think that this is caused by diseases that increase the risk of CVD and smoking. Conclusions Approximately 1/2 men has very high risk of CVD. It was determined that 1/2 men perceived risks are lower with false optimism and couldn’t accurately identify risks of people older and with diabetes. Key messages It can be ensured that develop risk reducing behaviors and individuals with high risk of CVD can raise their awareness. The risk perceptions of males in the very high-risk group from the past to the present are important because they affect their actual risks and risk-reducing behaviors.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2726-2726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delphine Rea ◽  
Tristan Mirault ◽  
Emmanuel Raffoux ◽  
Jean-Michel Miclea ◽  
Philippe Rousselot ◽  
...  

Background Nilotinib is approved for use in pts with CML after failure of imatinib and in newly diagnosed CP-CML. However, several studies report a nilotinib-associated risk of AOE, especially in pts with preexisting risk factors for CVD. Since CVD are a major cause of disability and death worldwide and result from complex interactions between multiple risk factors, we aimed at determining whether CVD risk estimation using the 2012 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) classification could be useful to identify patients at high risk of AOE during nilotinib therapy. Methods Pts (n=75) treated with nilotinib upfront or after failure of prior TKI at our institution were included provided that baseline risk factors for CVD and prior history of established CVD could be retrospectively collected. Risk factors included age, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus (DM), arterial hypertension (AH), dyslipidemia and increased body mass index (BMI). Patients were categorized into 2 groups according to ESC 2012 classification: low/moderate (L/M) and high/very high (H/VH) CVD risk. H/VH included pts with any of the following: established CVD, DM, severe AH, familial dysplipidemia or a SCORE (systematic coronary risk evaluation project) ≥5%. Results At nilotinib initiation, median age was 51 years (19-76), 41 pts (54.7%) were males. Nilotinib was given upfront in 28 pts (37%) and after failure of imatinib or dasatinib following imatinib in 47 pts (63%). Median time from diagnosis was 1 month (0.3-4) in the former group and 25 months (2-130) in the latter. Median duration of TKI exposure prior to nilotinib in the latter group was 22 months (0.4-91). Initial nilotinib dosing regimen was 400mg BID in 42 pts (56%) and 300mg BID in 33 pts (44%). Median duration of nilotinib treatment of 28 months (3-76) and median follow-up was 30 months (3-77). At baseline, medical history revealed H/VH risk category in 15 pts (20%) including established CVD in 6 pts (8%) (all diagnosed before CML), DM in 10 pts (13.3%), severe AH in 1 pt (1.3%), familial dyslipidemia in 1 pt (1.3%) and a SCORE ≥5% in 2 pts (2.6%). Median number of CVD risk factors was 1 (0-6) including age ≥ 45 years in men and ≥ 55 years in women in 37 pts (49.3%), active smoking or ceased during the previous year in 12 pts (16.7%), DM in 10 pts (13.3%), AH in 14 pts (18.7%), dyslipidemia in 10 pts (13.3%) and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2in 20 pts (38.6). Nilotinib was discontinued in 23 pts (30.7%) due to adverse events (10 pts), resistance (7 pts), TKI discontinuation study (4 pts) or death (2 pts). AOE occurred in 12 pts after a median duration of nilotinib treatment of 24 months (9-47). AOE included myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary heart disease (CHD) (n=3), cerebrovascular events (CeVD) (n=3) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) (n=6). Overall, the cumulative incidence of AOE was 2.91% (95% CI: 0.74-11.42) by 12 months, 9.81% (95% CI: 4.57-21.08) by 24 months, 19.29 (95% CI: 10.77-34.56) by 36 months and 27.7% (95% CI: 16.2-47.35) by 48 months (discontinuation of nilotinib and death as competing risks). Cumulative incidence of AOE by 48 months was 72.22% (95% CI: 47.46-100) in the H/VH group and only 12.13% (95% CI: 4.32-34.08) in the L/M group. Log Rank comparison of Kaplan Meier analysis of 48-month survival without AOE showed a significant difference between the 2 groups (27.78% (95% CI: 0-58.9) versus 84.38% (95% CI: 67.04-100) p=0.0001). Sensitivity of the ESC classification in nilotinib-treated patients was 67% and specificity 89%. It is important to note that all pts with a history of AOE had recurrent AOE on nilotinib. Nilotinib was discontinued in 11 pts with AOE after a median time of 288 days (1-688), 7 pts had recurrent or worsening AOE before nilotinib discontinuation and 2 pts died from AOE. Conclusions In our retrospective study, CVD risk estimation according to the 2012 ESC classification reveals that pts who belong to the H/VH risk group at baseline are at very high risk of AOE during nilotinib therapy. These findings now need to be validated in a prospective fashion. Nevertheless, we readily recommend that assessment of CVD risk should be performed in all pts considered for nilotinib therapy. Alternative TKI may be chosen whenever possible in pts at H/VH risk of CVD. In those treated with nilotinib, CVD risk should be reassessed throughout therapy and risk factors should be tightly controlled according to current guidelines. Disclosures: Rea: BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; ARIAD: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria. Messas:Novartis: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1672-1672
Author(s):  
Meritxell Nomdedeu ◽  
Xavier Calvo ◽  
Dolors Costa ◽  
Montserrat Arnan ◽  
Helena Pomares ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: The MDS are a group of clonal hematopoietic disorders characterized by blood cytopenias and increased risk of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The MDS predominate in old people (median age at diagnosis > 70 years) so that a fraction of the observed mortality would be driven by age-related factors shared with the general population rather than the MDS. Distinguishing between the MDS-related and unrelated mortality rates will help better assessment of the population health impact of the MDS and more accurate prognostication. This study was aimed at quantifying the MDS-attributable mortality and its relationship with the IPSSR risk categories. Methods: The database of the GESMD was queried for patients diagnosed with primary MDS after 1980 according to the WHO 2001 classification. Patients with CMML, younger than 16 years or who lacked the basic demographic or follow-up data were excluded. Relative survival and MDS-attributable mortality were calculated by the cohort method and statistically compared by Poisson multivariate regression as described by Dickman (Stat Med 2004; 23: 51). Three main parameters were calculated: the observed (all-cause) mortality, the MDS-attributable mortality (both as percentage of the initial cohort), and the fraction of the observed mortality attributed to the MDS. Results: In total, 7408 patients met the inclusion criteria and constitute the basis for this study. Among these patients, 5307 had enough data to be classified according to the IPSSR. Median age was 74 (IQR: 16-99) years and 58 % were males. The most frequent WHO categories were RAEB, type I or II (29% of cases), RCMD (28%), and RA with ring sideroblasts (16%). Most patients (72%) were classified within the very low and low risk categories of the IPSSR. At the study closing date (December 2014), 1022 patients had progressed to AML, 3198 had died (974 after AML) and 3210 were censored alive. The median actuarial survival for the whole series was 4.8 (95% CI: 4.6-5.1) years and 30% of patients are projected to survive longer than 10 years. The overall MDS-attributable mortality at 5 years from diagnosis was 39%, which accounted for three-quarters of the observed mortality (51%, figure). The corresponding figures at 10 years for the MDS-attributable and observed mortality were 55% and 71%, respectively. According to the IPSSR, the 5-year MDS-attributable mortality rates was 19% for the very low risk category, 39% (low risk), 70% (intermediate risk), 78% (high risk), and 92% (very high risk). On average, the incidence rate ratio for the MDS-attributable mortality increased 1.9 times (95% CI: 1.7-2.3, p<0.001) as the IPSSR worsened from one to the next risk category. The fraction of the observed mortality attributed to the MDS was 0.55 for the very low risk category, 0.79 (low risk), 0.93 (intermediate risk), 0.96 (high risk), and 0.99 (very high risk). After distinguishing between AML-related and unrelated mortality, the 5-year MDS-attributable mortality not related to AML was 10% for the very low risk category, 20% (low risk), 33% (intermediate risk), 42% (high risk), and 44% (very high risk). By comparing these figures with the above ones, we could estimate that about 50% of the MDS-attributable mortality was AML-unrelated and that such fraction kept nearly constant across the five IPSSR categories. Conclusions: About three-quarters of the mortality observed in patients with MDS is caused by the disease, the remaining one-quarter being due to MDS-independent factors shared with the general population. The MDS-attributable mortality increases with the IPSSR risk category, from half the observed mortality in the very low risk to nearly all the mortality observed in the high and very high risk groups. Half the MDS-attributable mortality is driven by factors unrelated to leukemic transformation, a proportion that keeps constant across the five IPSSR risk categories. Disclosures Valcarcel: AMGEN: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Ramos:AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria; JANSSEN: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Esteve:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria.


2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. A94.E892
Author(s):  
Mackram Eleid ◽  
Steven Lester ◽  
Troy Wiedenbeck ◽  
Sharad Patel ◽  
Christopher Appleton ◽  
...  

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
Gediminas Urbonas ◽  
Lina Vencevičienė ◽  
Leonas Valius ◽  
Ieva Krivickienė ◽  
Linas Petrauskas ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention guidelines define targets for lifestyle and risk factors for patients at high risk of developing CVD. We assessed the control of these factors, as well as CVD risk perception in patients enrolled into the primary care arm of the European Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events (EUROASPIRE V) survey in Lithuania. Materials and Methods: Data were collected as the part of the EUROASPIRE V survey, a multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional observational study. Adults without a documented CVD who had been prescribed antihypertensive medicines and/or lipid-lowering medicines and/or treatment for diabetes (diet and/oral antidiabetic medicines and/or insulin) were eligible for the survey. Data were collected through the review of medical records, patients’ interview, physical examination and laboratory tests. Results: A total of 201 patients were enrolled. Very few patients reached targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (4.5%), waist circumference (17.4%) and body mass index (15.4%). Only 31% of very high CVD risk patients and 52% of high-risk patients used statins. Blood pressure target was achieved by 115 (57.2%) patients. Only 21.7% of patients at very high actual CVD risk and 27% patients at high risk correctly estimated their risk. Of patients at moderate actual CVD risk, 37.5% patients accurately self-assessed the risk. About 60%–80% of patients reported efforts to reduce the intake of sugar, salt or alcohol; more than 70% of patients were current nonsmokers. Only a third of patients reported weight reduction efforts (33.3%) or regular physical activity (27.4%). Conclusions: The control of cardiovascular risk factors in a selected group of primary prevention patients was unsatisfactory, especially in terms of LDL-C level and body weight parameters. Many patients did not accurately perceive their own risk of developing CVD.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Genkel ◽  
A Salashenko ◽  
I Shaposhnik

Abstract Introduction According to the current guidelines the visualization of atherosclerotic plaques in the carotid arteries is the only option that carotid ultrasound provides for the assessment of cardiovascular risk (CVR). The direction devoted to the development and implementation of markers based on the quantification of atheroma, is promising. Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic value of various markers of carotid atherosclerosis (plaque, carotid total plaque area (cTPA) and carotid stenosis) in patients at high and very high CVR. Methods The study included patients aged 40–75 years at high and very high CVR. All patients underwent carotid duplex ultrasound. The presence of carotid plaque was assessed according to Mannheim consensus. The percentage of stenosis was measured planimetrically in the B-mode by the diameter in the cross section of the vessel. cTPA was estimated in the longitudinal position, which allows to achieve the best visualization of plaque, the area of plaque was measured in the manual trace mode. These measurements were performed for each rendered plaque, followed by the calculation of the total value. The combined endpoint was cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or unstable angina (which required hospitalization), non-fatal stroke, and coronary revascularization. Results The study included 100 patients at high and very high risk. The duration of the follow-up period was 24.4 (14.1–34.3) months. The events constituting the combined endpoint occurred in 34 (34%) patients: cardiovascular death was recorded in 7 (7%) patients; non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke in 3 (3%) patients; unstable angina, which required hospitalization in 24 (24%) patients, while emergency coronary angiography was performed in 8 (8%) patients, coronary artery stenting was performed in 3 (3%) cases. The presence of carotid plaque in accordance with Cox regression after adjusting for factors such as sex, age, smoking, hypertension, BMI, eGFR, LDL-c and HbA1c, RR of adverse cardiovascular events was 10.5 (95% CI 1.27–86.5; p=0.008; see Figure 1). The optimal cut-off values of cTPA and carotid stenosis were determined by ROC-analysis. An increase in cTPA ≥69 mm2 corrected for sex, age, smoking, hypertension, BMI, eGFR, LDL-c, HbA1c, and the presence of carotid plaque was associated with an increase in the RR of adverse cardiovascular events by 5.86 times (95% CI 2.09–16.4; p=0.001; see Figure 1). Also, there were no statistically significant associations between carotid arteries stenosis and adverse cardiovascular events (RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.61–2.76; p=0.504). Kaplan–Meier curves for cTPA, stenosis Conclusion In patients at high and very high cardiovascular risk among carotid ultrasound parameters the presence of carotid plaque and cTPA, but not the degree of stenosis, had an independent predictive value regarding the development of adverse cardiovascular events.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olamide O. Todowede ◽  
Benn Sartorius ◽  
Nombulelo Magula ◽  
Aletta E. Schutte

Abstract Background South Africa has the largest population of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) realising the benefits of increased life expectancy. However, this population may be susceptible to cardiovascular disease (CVD) development, due to the chronic consequences of a lifestyle-related combination of risk factors, HIV infection and ART. We predicted a 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk in an HIV-infected population on long-term ART, based on their observed metabolic risk factor profile. Methods We extracted data from hospital medical charts for 384 randomly selected HIV-infected patients aged ≥ 30 years. We defined metabolic syndrome (MetS) subcomponents using the International Diabetes Federation definition. A validated non-laboratory-based model for predicting a 10-year CVD mortality risk was applied and categorised into five levels, with the thresholds ranging from very low-risk (< 5%) to very high-risk scores (> 30%). Results Among the 384 patients, with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 42.90 ± 8.20 years, the proportion of patients that were overweight/obese was 53.3%, where 50.9% had low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and 21 (17.5%) had metabolic syndrome. A total of 144 patients with complete data allowed a definitive prediction of a 10-year CVD mortality risk. 52% (95% CI 44–60) of the patients were stratified to very low risk (< 5%) compared to 8% (95% CI 4–13) that were at a very high risk (> 30%) of 10-year CVD mortality. The CVD risk grows with increasing age (years), 57.82 ± 6.27 among very high risk and 37.52 ± 4.50; p < 0.001 in very low risk patients. Adjusting for age and analysing CVD risk mortality as a continuous risk score, increasing duration of HIV infection (p = 0.002) and ART (p = 0.007) were significantly associated with increased predicted 10 year CVD mortality risk. However, there was no association between these factors and categorised CVD mortality risk as per recommended scoring thresholds. Conclusions Approximately 1 in 10 HIV-infected patients is at very high risk of predicted 10-year CVD mortality in our study population. Like uninfected individuals, our study found increased age as a major predictor of 10-year mortality risk and high prevalence of metabolic syndrome. Additional CVD mortality risk due to the duration of HIV infection and ART was seen in our population, further studies in larger and more representative study samples are encouraged. It recommends an urgent need for early planning, prevention and management of metabolic risk factors in HIV populations, at the point of ART initiation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Gurunathan ◽  
M Shanmuganathan ◽  
R Hampson ◽  
R Khattar ◽  
R Senior

Abstract Introduction Traditional risk assessment tools classify the majority of women at low risk despite cardiovascular disease remaining the leading cause of death in women. Additionally conventional stress testing techniques have poor predictive value in women, due to unique pathophysiological mechanisms causing ischaemia in women, and the lower prevalence of obstructive CAD. The study sought to evaluate the role of adjuvant carotid ultrasound (CU) in women attending for stress echocardiography (SE). Methods and results 415 women (Mean age 62±10 years, 28% Diabetes Mellitus, Mean BMI 28) attending for SE prospectively underwent CU, to assess Carotid Intima-media thickness (CIMT) and the presence of plaque. 47 women (11%) had inducible wall motion abnormalities, and carotid disease (CD) was present in 46% (Carotid plaque in 41%, 15% CIMT >75th percentile). Women with CD were older (65 vs 58 years, p<0.0001), more likely to have Diabetes (41% vs 21%, p=0.0001) and hypertension (67% vs 36%, p<0.01), and had higher pretest probability of CAD (59% vs 41%, p<0.0001). 40% of women classified as low Framingham, were found to have evidence of CD. Conversely, only 40% of women classified as high Framingham risk, had CD. The positive predictive value of SE for flow-limiting CAD was 51%, but the presence of carotid plaque improved this to 71% (p<0.01). Of all clinical and test parameters, carotid plaque (p=0.001) and SE result (p=0.01) were the only independent predictors of >70% angiographic. Conclusion CU significantly improves the accuracy of SE alone for identifying flow-limiting disease on coronary angiography. Non-invasive assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis using CU offers an individualized disease-guided approach in women, where conventional scoring systems offer modest risk stratification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document