scholarly journals Growth and Allocation of Woody Biomass in Forest Trees Based on Environmental Conditions

Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 154
Author(s):  
Alessio Collalti ◽  
Luigi Todaro ◽  
Angelo Rita

Terrestrial ecosystems, and forests in particular, are important components of land processes because of their key role in reducing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations by storing a large amount of carbon in tree biomass and soils [...]

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stella White ◽  
Ribka Sionita Tarigan ◽  
Anak Agung Ketut Aryawan ◽  
Edgar Turner ◽  
Sarah Luke ◽  
...  

<p>Oil palm (OP) growers are under pressure to reduce their environmental impact. Ecosystem function and biodiversity are at the forefront of the issue, but what effect do changes in management practices have on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes from plantations? </p><p>The Riparian Ecosystem Restoration in Tropical Agriculture (RERTA) Project is a collaboration between the University of Cambridge and the SMART Research Institute in Riau, Indonesia. This project explores the ecological changes resulting from the restoration of riparian margins between plantations and watercourses. Four management strategies were applied on both sides of a river to create 50m riparian buffers, 400m in length: (1) A control treatment of no restoration, the removal of mature OP and replanting of young OP to the river margin; (2) Little to no agricultural management of mature OP; (3) Clearance of mature OP and enrichment planting with native forest trees; (4) Little or no agricultural management of mature OP and enrichment planting with native forest trees. Here we present a specific objective to investigate the effect of riparian restoration – and related changes in soil characteristics, structure and vegetation cover – on fluxes of N<sub>2</sub>O, CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> from mineral soils.</p><p>The experimental site began as a mature OP plantation, with monthly background measurements taken between January and April 2019. Palms were felled in April 2019 and monthly sampling was resumed when replanting and restoration began, in October 2019. We measured GHGs using static chambers; 6 in each riparian treatment and 16 in the actual OP plantation, 40 chambers in total. Samples were analysed using GC-FID/µECD.</p><p>Background measurements before felling showed high variability, but indicated no difference between the four experimental plots and the rest of the plantation. Fluxes measured following replanting were also highly variable, with no significant differences observed between treatments. N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes were relatively low before felling as the mature palms were no longer fertilised. Higher emissions were seen in the disturbed immature OP and forest tree treatments following replanting. Though the sites appeared to recover quickly and emission fluxes decreased after a few months, presumably as the soil settled and new vegetation began to grow. CH<sub>4</sub> uptake was seen in the immature OP treatment immediately after replanting. In subsequent months no clear trends of CH<sub>4</sub> uptake or emission were observed, with the greatest variability generally seen in the forest tree treatment. CH<sub>4</sub> emissions increased in October 2020 with the beginning of the rainy season, most notably in mature OP and mature OP with forest tree treatments. Following restoration CO<sub>2</sub> emissions were higher in treatments with established plant communities – mature OP and mature OP with forest trees.</p><p>These results suggest that riparian restoration had no significant effect on GHG fluxes from mineral soils, and would not alter the overall GHG budget of a plantation. If there is no additional GHG burden and riparian restoration results in enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem services as well as improving water quality, it will be a viable management option to improve the environmental impact of an OP plantation.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Maggioli ◽  
Aitor Alameda ◽  
Jose Raúl Román ◽  
Sonia Chamizo ◽  
Carlotta Pagli ◽  
...  

<p>Nowadays, land use change and the impacts of climate change are accelerating land degradation processes in drylands. These regions occupy around 40% of the Earth land’s surface and their extension is likely to represent around 45% by 2050. Biocrusts (complex communities formed by bacteria, cyanobacteria, microalgae, fungi, lichens and mosses which live in the uppermost layer of soil and can cover up to 70% of the interplant areas) play a decisive role in soil stabilization and fertility in these regions, so that they have been proposed as restoration agents in degraded dryland sites, where water scarcity and the harsh environmental conditions can hinder traditional restoration based on the use of vegetation establishment. Within the different biocrust-forming organisms, the use of cyanobacteria as a biotechnological tool to combat soil degradation, is gaining increasing importance. Cyanobacteria are the pioneer colonizers of terrestrial ecosystems, they are able to resist extreme environmental conditions, i.e. high temperatures, prolonged UV radiation and nutrients scarcity. At the same time, they improve physical-chemical properties of the soil by fixing carbon and many species also the atmospheric nitrogen and by producing exopolysaccharides that strongly increase soil stability and eventually creating a more favorable environment for colonization by other organisms. Despite several laboratory studies demonstrate the effectiveness of inoculating soil with cyanobacteria and their effect in increasing soil carbon and nutrient content, few field studies are available and many of them show a limited success probably because of the harsh environmental conditions that hamper an optimal growth. In the present work, soils collected from different ecosystems  in SE Spain were inoculated with a consortium of four native cyanobacteria species: Nostoc comune, Trichocoleus desertorum, Tolypothrix distorta and Leptolyngbia sp., and  different techniques to reduce abiotic stresses were tested in outdoors conditions: 1) cyanobacteria + soil covered with a mesh made of Stipa tenacissima, 2) cyanobacteria+ Plantago-based stabilizer amendment, and 3) cyanobacteria + sewage sludge (incorporated as an organic amendment) . The application of plant-based ameliorating strategies resulted in a higher chlorophyll a content, which reflects an improvement of cyanobacterial growth compared to the inoculation lacking the application of ameliorating techniques. The soil albedo also decreased due to surface darkening, thus also indicating a higher cyanobacterial growth in these treatments. Wind tunnel experiments also demonstrated a lower susceptibility to wind erosion in the cyanobacteria-inoculated soils combined with application of the plant mesh or the Plantago amendment. These results highlight the importance of using plant-based amelioration techniques to reduce abiotic stresses, especially in the early stages of soil colonization after cyanobacteria inoculation. Regarding the use of sewage sludge, it was demonstrated that their application at low doses improved cyanobacteria growth, which was reflected in an increase in chlorophyll a content as well as in a significant increase of aggregate stability and reduced soil susceptibility to wind erosion. This study shows promising results to enhance cyanobacterial growth and prevent cyanobacteria inoculum loss under natural conditions. Ongoing experiments will evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies under field conditions.</p>


2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 3357-3380 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Luyssaert ◽  
G. Abril ◽  
R. Andres ◽  
D. Bastviken ◽  
V. Bellassen ◽  
...  

Abstract. Globally, terrestrial ecosystems have absorbed about 30% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions over the period 2000–2007 and inter-hemispheric gradients indicate that a significant fraction of terrestrial carbon sequestration must be north of the Equator. We present a compilation of the CO2, CO, CH4 and N2O balances of Europe following a dual constraint approach in which (1) a land-based balance derived mainly from ecosystem carbon inventories and (2) a land-based balance derived from flux measurements are compared to (3) the atmospheric data-based balance derived from inversions constrained by measurements of atmospheric GHG (greenhouse gas) concentrations. Good agreement between the GHG balances based on fluxes (1294 ± 545 Tg C in CO2-eq yr−1), inventories (1299 ± 200 Tg C in CO2-eq yr−1) and inversions (1210 ± 405 Tg C in CO2-eq yr−1) increases our confidence that the processes underlying the European GHG budget are well understood and reasonably sampled. However, the uncertainty remains large and largely lacks formal estimates. Given that European net land to atmosphere exchanges are determined by a few dominant fluxes, the uncertainty of these key components needs to be formally estimated before efforts could be made to reduce the overall uncertainty. The net land-to-atmosphere flux is a net source for CO2, CO, CH4 and N2O, because the anthropogenic emissions by far exceed the biogenic sink strength. The dual-constraint approach confirmed that the European biogenic sink removes as much as 205 ± 72 Tg C yr−1 from fossil fuel burning from the atmosphere. However, This C is being sequestered in both terrestrial and inland aquatic ecosystems. If the C-cost for ecosystem management is taken into account, the net uptake of ecosystems is estimated to decrease by 45% but still indicates substantial C-sequestration. However, when the balance is extended from CO2 towards the main GHGs, C-uptake by terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems is offset by emissions of non-CO2 GHGs. As such, the European ecosystems are unlikely to contribute to mitigating the effects of climate change.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander A. Myburg ◽  
Steven G. Hussey ◽  
Jack P. Wang ◽  
Nathaniel R. Street ◽  
Eshchar Mizrachi

2013 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 547-549
Author(s):  
Jens-Arne Subke ◽  
Marc Lamers ◽  
Michael Herbst ◽  
Alan Franzluebbers

2011 ◽  
Vol 343 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Ambus ◽  
Ute Skiba ◽  
Klaus Butterbach-Bahl ◽  
Mark A. Sutton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document