scholarly journals Results of a 2021 French National Survey on Management of Patients with Advanced Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 4829
Author(s):  
Leonor Drouin ◽  
Benedetta Guani ◽  
Vincent Balaya ◽  
Henri Azaïs ◽  
Sarah Betrian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
French Society ◽  
Electronic Survey ◽  
Primary Debulking Surgery ◽  
Medical Oncologists ◽  
Surgical Data ◽  
Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Background: The aim of this study was to assess current French practices in the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Method: a 58-question electronic survey was distributed anonymously to the members of the SFOG (French Society of Gynaecological Oncology), GINECO-ARCAGY (National Investigators Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer Studies in France) and FRANCOGYN (French research group in oncological and gynaecological surgery). Initial diagnostic workup and staging, pathological data, surgical data, treatments and follow-up strategies were assessed. Results: a total of 107 participants responded to emailed surveys. Most of the respondents were obstetrician-gynaecologists (37.4%), surgical oncologists (34.6%) and medical oncologists (17.8%). According to most (76.8%) participants, less than 50% of patients were eligible for primary debulking surgery (PDS). The LION study criteria were applied in 69.5% of cases during PDS and 39% after chemotherapy. The timing of BRCA testing was very heterogeneous and ranged from 1 to 6 months. The use of bevacizumab as an adjuvant schedule was lower in cases of no residual disease (for 54.5% of respondents) compared to cases of residual disease (for 63.6% of respondents). In cases of BRCA1-2 mutations, olaparib was given by 75.8–84.8% of respondents, whereas niraparib was given in cases of BRCA wild-type diseases. Conclusion: this survey provides an extensive and a unique review of current French practices in the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in 2021.

Primary Surgery or Interval Debulking for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Does It Matter?

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1420-1428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Algirdas Markauskas ◽  
Ole Mogensen ◽  
René dePont Christensen ◽  
Pernille Tine Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Primary Debulking Surgery ◽  
Surgical Complexity ◽  
Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to investigate the surgical complexity, the postoperative morbidity, and the survival of the women after primary debulking surgery (PDS) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.Materials and MethodsWe consecutively included all patients who underwent debulking surgery at our institution between January 2007 and December 2012 for stages IIIc and IV of epithelial ovarian cancer.ResultsOf the 332 patients included, 165 (49.7%) underwent PDS, and 167 (50.3%) had NACT-IDS. Complete intraperitoneal cytoreduction was achieved in 70.9% after PDS and in 59.9 % after NACT-IDS. Residual disease of greater than 1 cm was left in 18.5% and 27.5% after PDS and NACT-IDS, respectively. Compared with NACT-IDS, PDS was associated with higher surgical complexity (P < 0.001), longer operating time (P < 0.001), greater blood loss (P < 0.001), longer hospitalization (P = 0.001), and a higher rate of major postoperative complications (26.7% vs 16.8%). No statistical difference in the median overall survival (OS) was found between the patients having complete cytoreduction and residual disease of 1 cm or less after NACT-IDS. Furthermore, no statistical difference in the median OS was found between the patients with macroscopic residual disease (≤1 vs >1 cm) after NACT-IDS. Patients with residual disease of greater than 1 cm after PDS had a median OS of 15 months.ConclusionsWe suggest that NACT-IDS may be a better treatment alternative for the group of highly selected women not suitable for PDS, where expected suboptimal cytoreduction does not have any appreciable survival benefit and exposes them for unnecessary risks. A substantial number of women who receive either PDS or NACT-IDS have greater than 1 cm of tumor tissue left after the operation. These women probably have no survival benefit from the operation, and future studies should focus on how to select these women preoperatively.

Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC): Is there a place for maintenance therapy in patients with sub-optimal debulking?

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14580-e14580
Author(s):  
R. Hariprasad ◽  
L. Kumar ◽  
S. Kumar ◽  
N. Bhatla ◽  
S. Thulkar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Skin Rash ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Group I ◽  
Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Group Ii

e14580 Background: Survival of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with initial suboptimal debulking surgery (residual disease (>1 cm) and those with recurrent EOC is poor. We used EGFR inhibitor gefitinib for maintenance and analyzed data on safety and toxicity. Methods: Between Nov. 2004 and Dec. 2008, Patients who achieved complete response (CR) following six cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin received gefitinib as (Group I). Similarly, patients with recurrent EOC who achieved CR following six cycles of salvage CT received gefitinib (Group II). Both groups received gefitinib 250 mg once daily till evidence of relapse. Patients were examined every month and toxicity (CTC version II) was recorded. Serum CA-125 was done once in 2 months and CAT scan of abdomen & pelvis every 6 month. The study was approved by Institute Ethics Committee and informed written consent was obtained from each patient. Results: A total of 48 patients (median age 47 years, range 23 to 63) have been recruited. Group I: 17 subjects and Group II 31 patients (1st relapse- 13, 2nd- 9, 3rd -6 & 4th relapse in 3 patients). The mean duration of gefitinib treatment is 8.77 months (Gp-I: 14.4 months, Gp-II: 5.68 months). Toxicity was mainly in the form of skin rash & diarrhea. Skin rash: 16 patients (33.3%); Group I - 8 (grade I-2, II-4, III-3,) & Group II - 8 patients (grade I-3,II-4,III-1). Diarrhea: 12 patients (25%); Group I-3, group II- 9) all grade I. Two patients had both skin rashes and diarrhea. No pulmonary or hematological toxicity was observed. Currently, 13 patients are on gefitinib (mean duration of treatment 12.6 months); in 34 patients gefitinib has been discontinued due to relapse and in 1 patient due to grade III skin rashes over face. Among 18 patients with skin toxicity, 8 continue to be disease-free compared to 6 of 30 without skin toxicity (p=0.07). Conclusions: Gefitinib was tolerated well with mild toxicities limited to skin and GIT. Correlations between EGFR expressions vs. response may help to identify patients likely to benefit from gefitinib therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals The Value of CA 125 and CA72-4 in Management of Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salah T. Fayed ◽  
Samira M. Ahmad ◽  
Samar K. Kassim ◽  
Ali Khalifa
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Pelvic Masses ◽  
Radiometric Assay ◽  
Normal Women

The role of the tumor markers CA125 and CA72-4 has been evaluated in the diagnosis and management of ovarian cancer. Both markers were measured in 30 patients with proven epithelial ovarian cancer, 30 patients with benign pelvic masses and 30 normal women. CA125 and CA72-4 were measured using the luminometric immunoassay and immuno-radiometric assay respectively. All patients with ovarian cancer were submitted to surgical staging and cytoreduction followed by adjuvant platinum based chemotherapy for 3–6 courses. Fixing the specificity at 95%, CA125 had a sensitivity of 76.7% at a cut-off 85u/ml while CA72-4 had a sensitivity of 70% at a cut-off 8.5 u/ml. The combination of CA72-4 with CA125 increased the sensitivity to 95% while fixing the specificity at 95%. Among seven cases with stage I and II ovarian cancer five cases had CA125 level below 85 U/ml, three patients out of them had CA72-4 above 8.5 U/ml. CA 72-4 could reflect the residual disease following cytoreduction and could improve the detection of relapse by CA125.Conclusion: CA72-4 could complement the standard tumor marker CA125 both in diagnosis and follow up of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document