scholarly journals Outcome of Elderly Patients with Venous Thromboembolism Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants—A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (23) ◽  
pp. 5673
Author(s):  
Irit Ayalon-Dangur ◽  
Yakov Vega ◽  
Miriam Rozi Israel ◽  
Alon Grossman ◽  
Galia Spectre ◽  
...  

Introduction: Randomized controlled trials that compared direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), demonstrated both efficacy and safety of DOACs. The aim of the current study was to compare DOACs to VKA for the treatment of VTE in the elderly, in a real-life setting. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in Rabin Medical Center encompassing a 7-year period. Hospitalized patients >65 years, with a diagnosis of VTE discharged with DOACs or VKA were included. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, major bleeding, recurrent VTEs and hospitalizations throughout the follow-up period of one year. Results: A total of 603 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 79.6 ± 8.5 years. The primary composite outcome occurred in 74.6% and 56.7% of the patients in the VKA group and DOACs group, respectively, hazard ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 0.76, in favor of the DOACs group. In a matched cohort analysis, the results were the same as the original analysis. Conclusion: In the elderly population, treatment of VTE with DOACs was associated with a lower rate of the composite outcome. DOACs are safe and effective for elderly patients with VTE.

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (S1) ◽  
pp. 29-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Panarese ◽  
Vito D’Andrea ◽  
Stefano Pontone ◽  
Pasqualino Favoriti ◽  
Daniele Pironi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110250
Author(s):  
Eric M. Coons ◽  
Britta A. Staubes ◽  
Ashley L. Casey ◽  
Stephanie A. Elagizi-Youssef ◽  
Alaa E. Mohammed ◽  
...  

Background Evidence for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cirrhosis is limited. Few patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class B and C cirrhosis have been studied. Objective To compare major bleeding rates in patients with cirrhosis receiving a DOAC versus warfarin. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in adults with cirrhosis receiving a DOAC versus warfarin for venous thromboembolism, portal-vein thrombosis, or atrial fibrillation. The primary outcome was the rate of major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included time to major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, all bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and new thromboembolic events. The study was approved by the Ochsner Health System Institutional Review Board. Results A total of 44 patients receiving a DOAC and 41 patients receiving warfarin were included. Major bleeding occurred in 4 patients receiving a DOAC and 6 patients receiving warfarin (9.1% vs 14.6%; P = 0.881). Rates of major bleeding were similar in 24 DOAC and 17 warfarin patients with CTP Class B (4.2% vs 17.6%; P = 0.37) and 8 DOAC and 9 warfarin patients with CTP Class C (37.5% vs 11.1%; P = 0.41) cirrhosis. Secondary bleeding and efficacy outcomes were similar between cohorts. The study was limited by a small sample size. Conclusion and Relevance Treatment with DOACs in patients with cirrhosis was associated with a similar rate of major bleeding compared with warfarin. Inclusion of CTP class C patients in future studies remains valuable to evaluate safety and efficacy of DOACs in this population.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vorawee Varavithya ◽  
Chayanee Tirapat ◽  
Penpitcha Rojpibulstit ◽  
Panadda Poovichayasumlit ◽  
Vanida Prasert ◽  
...  

AbstractPurposeTo examine the association between potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) use and the hospitalization rate in elderly Thai patients.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we collected the electronic medical data of elderly patients aged 60 years and older who visited the outpatient department (OPD) at Thammasat University Hospital in Thailand in 2015. The patients were categorized into PIM and non-PIM users according to the Beers 2019 criteria. We calculated descriptive statistics for demographic variables. We also examined the association between PIM use and various different factors with hospitalization rate during follow-up using log-binomial regression. We calculated the relative risk for association between PIM use and other factors with the hospitalization rate.ResultsWe collected data for a total of 32,261 patients. The majority of participants were female (59.65%) and had a mean age of 70.21 years (SD=7.88). Overall, 63.98% of the patients (n=20,641) were PIM users and 49.45% (n=15,952) received polypharmacy (≥5 medications). The most common PIM prescription was proton-pump inhibitors, which were 27.51% of all medications prescribed. We found that PIM use increased the risk of hospitalization by 1.31 times (adjusted RR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.21 – 1.41, p-value < 0.001). Other factors associated with a higher rate of hospitalizations included older age, male gender, polypharmacy, and a higher number of OPD visits.ConclusionPIMs were commonly prescribed to the elderly in the OPD, and were significantly associated with subsequent hospitalization. The provision of an alternative drug list can help physicians avoid prescribing PIMs to the elderly. If PIMs prescription is unavoidable, physicians should closely monitor patients for drug-related problems and deprescribe PIMs when they are no longer indicated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document