scholarly journals Early Spinal Injury Stabilization in Multiple-Injured Patients: Do All Patients Benefit?

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Kobbe ◽  
Patrick Krug ◽  
Hagen Andruszkow ◽  
Miguel Pishnamaz ◽  
Martijn Hofman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Spinal Surgery ◽  
Independent Risk Factor ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Spinal Injury ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Spinal Stabilization ◽  
Multiple Injured ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
Multiple Injured Patients

Background: Thoracolumbar spine fractures in multiple-injured patients are a common injury pattern. The appropriate timing for the surgical stabilization of vertebral fractures is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyse the impact of the timing of spinal surgery in multiple-injured patients both in general and in respect to spinal injury severity. Methods: A retrospective analysis of multiple-injured patients with an associated spinal trauma within the thoracic or lumbar spine (injury severity score (ISS) >16, age >16 years) was performed from January 2012 to December 2016 in two Level I trauma centres. Demographic data, circumstances of the accident, and ISS, as well as time to spinal surgery were documented. The evaluated outcome parameters were length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) (iLOS) and length of stay (LOS) in the hospital, duration of mechanical ventilation, onset of sepsis, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), as well as mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Results: A total of 113 multiple-injured patients with spinal stabilization and a complete dataset were included in the study. Of these, 71 multiple-injured patients (63%) presented with an AOSpine A-type spinal injury, whereas 42 (37%) had an AOSpine B-/C-type spinal injury. Forty-nine multiple-injured patients (43.4%) were surgically treated for their spinal injury within 24 h after trauma, and showed a significantly reduced length of stay in the ICU (7.31 vs. 14.56 days; p < 0.001) and hospital stay (23.85 vs. 33.95 days; p = 0.048), as well as a significantly reduced prevalence of sepsis compared to those surgically treated later than 24 h (3 vs. 7; p = 0.023). These adverse effects were even more pronounced in the case where cutoffs were increased to either 72 h or 96 h. Independent risk factors for a delay in spinal surgery were a higher ISS (p = 0.036), a thoracic spine injury (p = 0.001), an AOSpine A-type spinal injury (p = 0.048), and an intact neurological status (p < 0.001). In multiple-injured patients with AOSpine A-type spinal injuries, an increased time to spinal surgery was only an independent risk factor for an increased LOS; however, in multiple-injured patients with B-/C-type spinal injuries, an increased time to spinal surgery was an independent risk factor for increased iLOS, LOS, and the development of sepsis. Conclusion: Our data support the concept of early spinal stabilization in multiple-injured patients with AOSpine B-/C-type injuries, especially of the thoracic spine. However, in multiple-injured patients with AOSpine A-type injuries, the beneficial impact of early spinal stabilization has been overemphasized in former studies, and the benefit should be weighed out against the risk of patients’ deterioration during early spinal stabilization.

Spinal Injury Without Neurological Symptoms in Severely Injured Patients: Impact on the Length of Stay?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Fochtmann ◽  
Pascal Jungbluth ◽  
Werner Zimmermann ◽  
Rolf Lefering ◽  
Sven Lendemans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Independent Risk Factor ◽  
Spinal Injury ◽  
Neurological Symptoms ◽  
Severely Injured ◽  
Severely Injured Patients ◽  
Injured Patients

Abstract Background The impact of spinal injuries on clinical outcome in most severely injured patients is currently being controversially discussed. At the same time, most of the studies examine patients with post-traumatic neurological disorders. The aim of this study was therefore to analyse severely injured patients with spinal injuries but without neurological symptoms with regard to their clinical outcome. Here the focus was then on the question, whether spinal injury is an independent risk factor increasing length of stay in the intensive care unit and in the hospital in total. Material and Methods Data of the TraumaRegister DGU® were retrospectively analysed. Inclusion criteria were: Injury Severity Score ≥ 16, primary admission, age ≥ 16 years, time interval 2009 – 2016, and a full data set on length of stay in the hospital and the intensive care unit, respectively. Following a univariate analysis in the first step, independent risk factors for the length of stay in the intensive care unit and in the hospital in total were investigated using a multivariate regression analysis. Results 98,240 patients met the inclusion criteria. In this population, patients with Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2 and 3 spinal injuries were significantly younger (up to 60 years), and injuries were significantly more commonly caused by falls from a great height and traffic accidents (age ≤ 60 years: AISSpine 0: 58.4%, AISSpine 3: 65%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that spinal injury without neurological symptoms is an independent risk factor for increased length of stay in the intensive care unit (odds ratio: + 1.1 d) and in the hospital in total (AIS 3 odds ratio: + 3.4 d). Conclusion It has been shown for the first time that spinal injury without initial neurological symptoms has a negative impact on the length of stay of most severely injured patients in the intensive care unit and in the hospital in total and thus represents an independent risk factor in this group of patients.

scholarly journals Epidemiology and predictors of traumatic spine injury in severely injured patients: implications for emergency procedures

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Häske ◽  
◽  
Rolf Lefering ◽  
Jan-Philipp Stock ◽  
Michael Kreinest
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Spinal Injury ◽  
Spinal Injuries ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Emergency Procedures ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Injured Patients

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to identify the prevalence and predictors of spinal injuries that are suitable for immobilization. Methods Retrospective cohort study drawing from the multi-center database of the TraumaRegister DGU®, spinal injury patients ≥ 16 years of age who scored ≥ 3 on the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) between 2009 and 2016 were enrolled. Results The mean age of the 145,833 patients enrolled was 52.7 ± 21.1 years. The hospital mortality rate was 13.9%, and the mean injury severity score (ISS) was 21.8 ± 11.8. Seventy percent of patients had no spine injury, 25.9% scored 2–3 on the AIS, and 4.1% scored 4–6 on the AIS. Among patients with isolated traumatic brain injury (TBI), 26.8% had spinal injuries with an AIS score of 4–6. Among patients with multi-system trauma and TBI, 44.7% had spinal injuries that scored 4–6 on the AIS. Regression analysis predicted a serious spine injury (SI; AIS 3–6) with a prevalence of 10.6% and cervical spine injury (CSI; AIS 3–6) with a prevalence of 5.1%. Blunt trauma was a predictor for SI and CSI (OR 4.066 and OR 3.640, respectively; both p < 0.001) and fall > 3 m for SI (OR 2.243; p < 0.001) but not CSI (OR 0.636; p < 0.001). Pre-hospital shock was predictive for SI and CSI (OR 1.87 and OR 2.342, respectively; both p < 0.001), and diminished or absent motor response was also predictive for SI (OR 3.171) and CSI (OR 7.462; both p < 0.001). Patients over 65 years of age were more frequently affected by CSI. Conclusions In addition to the clinical symptoms of pain, we identify ‘4S’ [spill (fall) > 3 m, seniority (age > 65 years), seriously injured, skull/traumatic brain injury] as an indication for increased attention for CSIs or indication for spinal motion restriction.

scholarly journals Thromboembolic complications among multiple injured patients with pelvic injuries: identifying risk factors for possible patient-tailored prophylaxis

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Kirchner ◽  
Rolf Lefering ◽  
Richard Sandkamp ◽  
Helge Eberbach ◽  
Klaus Schumm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Acetabular Fractures ◽  
Thromboembolic Risk ◽  
Pelvic Injuries ◽  
Multiple Injured ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
Multiple Injured Patients

Abstract Background Patients with pelvic and/or acetabular fractures are at high risk of developing thromboembolic (TE) complications. In our study we investigate TE complications and the potential negative effects of concomitant pelvic or acetabular injuries in multiple injured patients according to pelvic/acetabular injury severity and fracture classification. Methods The TraumaRegister DGU® was analyzed between 2010 and 2019. Multiple injured patients with pelvic and/or acetabular fractures with ISS ≥ 16 suffering from TE complications were identified. We conducted a univariate and multivariate analysis with TE events as independent variable to examine potential risk factors and contributing factors. Results 10.634 patients met our inclusion criteria. The overall TE incidence was 4.9%. Independent risk factors for the development of TE complications were sepsis, ≥ 10 operative interventions, mass transfusion (≥ 10 PRBCs), age ≥ 65 years and AISAbdomen ≥ 3 (all p < 0.001). No correlation was found for overall injury severity (ISS), moderate traumatic brain injury, additional injury to lower extremities, type B and C pelvic fracture according to Tile/AO/OTA and closed or open acetabular fracture. Conclusions Multiple injured patients suffering from pelvic and/or acetabular fractures are at high risk of developing thromboembolic complications. Independent risk factors for the development of thromboembolic events in our study cohort were age ≥ 65 years, mass transfusion, AISAbdomen ≥ 3, sepsis and ≥ 10 surgery procedures. Among multiple injured patients with acetabular or pelvic injuries the severity of these injuries seems to have no further impact on thromboembolic risk. Our study, however, highlights the major impact of early hemorrhage and septic complications on thromboembolic risk in severely injured trauma patients. This may lead to individualized screening examinations and a patient-tailored thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients for TE. Furthermore, the number of surgical interventions should be minimized in these patients to reduce thromboembolic risk.

scholarly journals A retrospective cohort study of 27,049 polytraumatized patients age 60 and above: identifying changes over 16 years

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Kalbas ◽  
M. Lempert ◽  
F. Ziegenhain ◽  
J. Scherer ◽  
V. Neuhaus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Severe Trauma ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Treatment Algorithms ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Purpose The number of severely injured patients exceeding the age of 60 has shown a steep increase within the last decades. These patients present with numerous co-morbidities, polypharmacy, and increased frailty requiring an adjusted treatment approach. In this study, we establish an overview of changes we observed in demographics of older severe trauma patients from 2002 to 2017. Methods A descriptive analysis of the data from the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) was performed. Patients admitted to a level one trauma center in Germany, Austria and Switzerland between 2002 and 2017, aged 60 years or older and with an injury severity score (ISS) over 15 were included. Patients were stratified into subgroups based on the admission: 2002–2005 (1), 2006–2009 (2), 2010–2013 (3) and 2014–2017 (4). Trauma and patient characteristics, diagnostics, treatment and outcome were compared. Results In total 27,049 patients with an average age of 73.9 years met the inclusion criteria. The majority were males (64%), and the mean ISS was 27.4. The proportion of patients 60 years or older [(23% (1) to 40% (4)] rose considerably over time. Trauma mechanisms changed over time and more specifically low falls (< 3 m) rose from 17.6% (1) to 40.1% (4). Altered injury patterns were also identified. Length-of-stay decreased from 28.9 (1) to 19.5 days (4) and the length-of-stay on ICU decreased from 17.1 (1) to 12.7 days (4). Mortality decreased from 40.5% (1) to 31.8% (4). Conclusion Length of stay and mortality decreased despite an increase in patient age. We ascribe this observation mainly to increased use of diagnostic tools, improved treatment algorithms, and the implementation of specialized trauma centers for older patients allowing interdisciplinary care.

scholarly journals Treatment biases in traumatic neurosurgical care: a retrospective study of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2009

2015 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 406-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon A. McCutcheon ◽  
David C. Chang ◽  
Logan Marcus ◽  
David D. Gonda ◽  
Abraham Noorbakhsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vertebral Fracture ◽  
Spinal Fusion ◽  
Nationwide Inpatient Sample ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Spinal Injury ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Intracranial Hematoma ◽  
Uninsured Patients ◽  
Insured Patients

OBJECT This study was designed to assess the relationship between insurance status and likelihood of receiving a neurosurgical procedure following admission for either extraaxial intracranial hemorrhage or spinal vertebral fracture. METHODS A retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS; 1998–2009) was performed. Cases of traumatic extraaxial intracranial hematoma and spinal vertebral fracture were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes. Within this cohort, those patients receiving a craniotomy or spinal fusion and/or decompression in the context of an admission for traumatic brain or spine injury, respectively, were identified using the appropriate ICD-9 procedure codes. RESULTS A total of 190,412 patients with extraaxial intracranial hematoma were identified between 1998 and 2009. Within this cohort, 37,434 patients (19.7%) received a craniotomy. A total of 477,110 patients with spinal vertebral fracture were identified. Of these, 37,302 (7.8%) received a spinal decompression and/or fusion. On multivariate analysis controlling for patient demographics, severity of injuries, comorbidities, hospital volume, and hospital characteristics, uninsured patients had a reduced likelihood of receiving a craniotomy (odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–0.82) and spinal fusion (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.64–0.71) relative to insured patients. This statistically significant trend persisted when uninsured and insured patients were matched on the basis of mortality propensity score. Uninsured patients demonstrated an elevated risk-adjusted mortality rate relative to insured patients in cases of extraaxial intracranial hematoma. Among patients with spinal injury, mortality rates were similar between patients with and without insurance. CONCLUSIONS In this study, uninsured patients were consistently less likely to receive a craniotomy or spinal fusion for traumatic intracranial extraaxial hemorrhage and spinal vertebral fracture, respectively. This difference persisted after accounting for overall injury severity and patient access to high- or low-volume treatment centers, and potentially reflects a resource allocation bias against uninsured patients within the hospital setting. This information adds to the growing literature detailing the benefits of health reform initiatives seeking to expand access for the uninsured.

Elevated Systemic Interleukin-18 in Multiple Injured Patients Is Not Related to Clinical Outcome

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 741-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Roetman ◽  
Christian Schinkel ◽  
Mark Wick ◽  
Thomas Frangen ◽  
Gert Muhr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Interleukin 18 ◽  
Multiple Injured ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
Multiple Injured Patients

scholarly journals Surgery Delay Increases Length of Stay in Thoracolumbar Trauma

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Zeldin ◽  
Sean N Neifert ◽  
Robert J Rothrock ◽  
Ian T McNeill ◽  
Jonathan S Gal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Spinal Injury ◽  
Specific Effect ◽  
Spinal Trauma ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Delayed Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Surgery Timing

Abstract INTRODUCTION The ideal timing from admission of a thoracolumbar spinal trauma patient to the start of surgery at US trauma centers remains a hotly contested area of debate. The effect of surgical latency on patient outcomes in thoracolumbar trauma remains unclear. METHODS All 2013 to 2015 thoracolumbar spinal trauma cases from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) were analyzed. Patients with unsurvivable spine injury, polytraumas (serious injuries in more than one bodily region), and those discharged within 24 h were excluded. Patients were classified into 3 groups by surgery timing: less than 8 h (early, N = 1699), between 8 and 24 h (normal, N = 946), and over 24 h (delayed, N = 1601). Mortality, length of stay (LOS), and complication rates were compared between groups. Demographic variables and complication rates were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to determine the specific effect of surgery timing on outcomes. RESULTS Patients with earlier surgery presented with more severe spinal trauma (P < .0001). Patients in the normal surgical timing cohort were most likely to have altered mental status (4.97% vs 3.24%, P = .05), and less likely to suffer from UTI (4.97% vs 3.24%, P = .03). Patients in the delayed cohort were older (46.2 vs 43.7 yr, P = .0003), more likely to have a longer LOS (11.3 vs 10.6 d, P = .02), return to the ICU (2.94% vs 1.29%, P = .001), experience unplanned intubation (2.06% vs 1%, P = .01) and suffer from cardiac arrest (0.53% vs 1.19%, P = .04). Upon multivariate analysis, delayed surgery was an independent risk factor for prolonged LOS (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.56-1.87, P = .0003). CONCLUSION Patients with earlier surgery possessed more severe spinal injury. When adjusting for demographics and severity, no significant difference is seen in mortality between the different surgery times; however, LOS is prolonged in patients with delayed surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document