scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Milk Feeding and Short-Term Growth in Preterm and Very Low Birth Weight Infants

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 2089
Author(s):  
Machiko Suganuma ◽  
Alice R. Rumbold ◽  
Jacqueline Miller ◽  
Yan Fong Chong ◽  
Carmel T. Collins
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Human Milk ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Low Birth Weight Infants ◽  
Preterm Formula ◽  
Meta Analyses

Human milk (HM) is the gold standard for feeding infants but has been associated with slower growth in preterm infants compared with preterm formula. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarises the post-1990 literature to examine the effect of HM feeding on growth during the neonatal admission of preterm infants with birth weight ≤1500 g and/or born ≤28 weeks’ gestation. Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched, and comparisons were grouped as exclusive human milk (EHM) vs. exclusive preterm formula (EPTF), any HM vs. EPTF, and higher vs. lower doses of HM. We selected studies that used fortified HM and compared that with a PTF; studies comparing unfortified HM and term formula were excluded. Experimental and observational studies were pooled separately. The GRADE system was used to evaluate risk of bias and certainty of evidence. Forty-four studies were included with 37 (n = 9963 infants) included in the meta-analyses. In general, due to poor quality studies, evidence of the effect of any HM feeds or higher versus lower doses of HM was inconclusive. There was a possible effect that lower doses of HM compared with higher doses of HM improved weight gain during the hospital admission, and separately, a possible effect of increased head circumference growth in infants fed EPTF vs. any HM. The clinical significance of this is unclear. There was insufficient evidence to determine the effects of an exclusive HM diet on any outcomes.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Milk Feeding and Short-Term Growth in Preterm and Very Low Birth Weight Infants

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Machiko Suganuma ◽  
Alice R Rumbold ◽  
Jacqueline Miller ◽  
Yan Fong Chong ◽  
Carmel T Collins
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Human Milk ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Low Birth Weight Infants ◽  
Preterm Formula ◽  
Meta Analyses

Human milk (HM) is the gold standard for feeding infants but has been associated with slower growth in preterm infants compared with preterm formula. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarises the post-1990 literature to examine the effect of HM feeding on growth during the neonatal admission of preterm infants with birth weight ≤1500g and/or born ≤28 weeks’ gestation. Medline, PubMed, CINAHL and Scopus were searched, and comparisons grouped as: exclusive human milk (EHM) vs exclusive preterm formula (EPTF), any HM vs EPTF and higher vs lower doses of HM. We selected studies that used fortified HM and compared that with a PTF; studies comparing unfortified HM and term formula were excluded. Experimental and observational studies were pooled separately. The GRADE system was used to evaluate risk of bias and certainty of evidence. Forty-four studies were included with 37 (n =9,963 infants) included in the meta-analyses. In general, due to poor quality studies, evidence of the effect of any HM feeds or higher versus lower doses of HM was inconclusive. There was a possible effect that lower doses of HM compared with higher doses of HM improved weight gain during the hospital admission, and separately, a possible effect of increased head circumference growth in infants fed EPTF vs any HM. The clinical significance of this is unclear. There was insufficient evidence to determine the effects of an exclusive HM diet on any outcomes.

scholarly journals Probiotics Prevent Late-Onset Sepsis in Human Milk-Fed, Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nutrients ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arianna Aceti ◽  
Luca Maggio ◽  
Isadora Beghetti ◽  
Davide Gori ◽  
Giovanni Barone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Human Milk ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Late Onset Sepsis

scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Milk Feeding and Morbidity in Very Low Birth Weight Infants

Nutrients ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Miller ◽  
Emma Tonkin ◽  
Raechel Damarell ◽  
Andrew McPhee ◽  
Machiko Suganuma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Human Milk ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Low Birth Weight Infants ◽  
Milk Feeding

scholarly journals Growth Rates in Very Low Birth Weight Infants Fed Preterm Formula or Fortified Human Milk 1501

1998 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 256-256
Author(s):  
Carol Bullough ◽  
Marilyn M Chan ◽  
Carolyn Graves ◽  
Gary M Chan ◽  
Sharon Bator
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Human Milk ◽  
Growth Rates ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight Infants ◽  
Preterm Formula

scholarly journals Donor Human Milk Protects against Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Villamor-Martínez ◽  
Maria Pierro ◽  
Giacomo Cavallaro ◽  
Fabio Mosca ◽  
Boris W. Kramer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Human Milk ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Very Preterm Infants ◽  
Very Preterm ◽  
Donor Human Milk ◽  
Preterm Formula

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is the most common complication after preterm birth. Pasteurized donor human milk (DHM) has increasingly become the standard of care for very preterm infants over the use of preterm formula (PF) if mother’s own milk (MOM) is unavailable. Studies have reported beneficial effects of DHM on BPD. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on the effects of DHM on BPD and other respiratory outcomes. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of RCT’s could not demonstrate that supplementation of MOM with DHM reduced BPD when compared to PF (3 studies, risk ratio [RR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60–1.32). However, meta-analysis of observational studies showed that DHM supplementation reduced BPD (8 studies, RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67–0.90). An exclusive human milk diet reduced the risk of BPD, compared to a diet with PF and/or bovine milk-based fortifier (3 studies, RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68–0.95). Feeding raw MOM, compared to feeding pasteurized MOM, protected against BPD (2 studies, RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62–0.96). In conclusion, our data suggest that DHM protects against BPD in very preterm infants, but pasteurization of human milk reduces the benefit.

scholarly journals Effect of targeted vs standard fortification of breast milk on growth and development of preterm infants (≤ 32 weeks): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Seliga-Siwecka ◽  
Anna Chmielewska ◽  
Katarzyna Jasińska
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Human Milk ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Low Birth Weight Infants ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Link Type

Abstract Background Human milk is recommended for all very low birth weight infants. Breastmilk is highly variable in nutrient content, failing to meet the nutritional demands of this group. Fortification of human milk is recommended to prevent extrauterine growth retardation and associated poor neurodevelopmental outcome. However, standard fortification with fixed dose multicomponent fortifier does not account for the variability in milk composition. Targeted fortification is a promising alternative and needs further investigation. Methods This randomized controlled trial will recruit preterm infants (≤ 32 weeks of gestation) within the first 7 days of life. After reaching 80 ml/kg/day of enteral feeding, patients will be randomized to receive standard fortification (HMF, Nutricia) or targeted fortification (modular components: Bebilon Bialka, Nutricia—protein; Polycal, Nutricia—carbohydrates; Calogen, Nutricia—lipids). The intervention will continue until 37 weeks of post-conception age or hospital discharge. Parents and outcome assessors will be blinded to the intervention. The primary outcome measure is velocity of weight, length, and head growth until 36 weeks post-conceptional age or discharge. Secondary outcomes include neurodevelopment at 12 months assessed with Bayley Scale of Development III, repeated at 36 months; body composition at discharge and at 4 months; and incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, retinopathy of prematurity, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Discussion Targeted fortification has previously been shown as doable in the neonatal intensive care unit context. If it shows to improve growth and neonatal outcome, choosing the targeted fortification as a first line nutritional approach in very low birth weight infants may become a recommendation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT03775785, Registered on July 2019.

scholarly journals Is preterm donor milk better than preterm formula for very-low-birth-weight infants?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingyu Fang ◽  
Meili Zhang ◽  
Lianqiang Wu ◽  
Ruiquan Wang ◽  
Bangbang Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Necrotizing Enterocolitis ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Feeding Intolerance ◽  
Low Birth Weight Infants ◽  
Severe Morbidity ◽  
Preterm Formula ◽  
Feeding Tolerance

Background: Preterm human milk has advantages over preterm formula (PF), but it may compromise some functions after pasteurization. Objective: To explore the effects of preterm donor milk (DM) on growth, feeding tolerance, and severe morbidity in very-low-birth-weight infants. Method: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study that included 304 preterm infants weighing <1,500 g or of gestational age <32 weeks. If the mother’s own milk was insufficient, the parents decided to use PF (n = 155) or DM (n = 149). The two groups were uniformly managed according to the standard NICU protocol. Growth parameters, feeding tolerance, and severe morbidity such as necrotizing enterocolitis, were compared between the two groups. Results: The daily weight gain and weekly head growth in the DM group were not different from those in the PF group (P > 0.05). Feeding intolerance in the DM group was significantly lower than that in PF group (P < 0.05), and parenteral nutrition time and hospitalization time were also shorter than that in the PF group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis and sepsis was also significantly lower in the DM group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The study indicated that preterm DM does not affect the growth of very-low-birth-weight infants. Further, it significantly reduces feeding intolerance, helps achieve full enteral feeding early, and has protective effects against necrotizing enterocolitis and sepsis. Thus, compared with formula, preterm DM can lower the rate of infection in preterm infants and is worthy of promotion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document