scholarly journals Analisis Buy Back Saham Tanpa Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham pada PT Bank Mandiri, Tbk.

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-82
Author(s):  
Choirun Nisful Laili

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh pengumuman buyback terhadap respon pasar pada PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk berdasarkan Surat Edaran OJK Nomor 3/SEOJK.04/2020 tanggal 9 Maret 2020 tentang Kondisi Lain Sebagai Kondisi Pasar yang Berfluktuasi secara Signifikan dalam Pelaksanaan Pembelian Kembali Saham yang Dikeluarkan oleh Emiten atau Perusahaan Publik. Penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan yang signifikan Return, Abnormal Return, dan Trading Volume Activity saham sebelum dan sesudah pengumuman buyback saham tahun 2020. Objek penelitian adalah PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. Hasil penelitian ini adalah tidak terdapat perbedaan antara Return sebelum dan sesudah pengumuman buyback saham di PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. Untuk Abnormal Return sebelum dan sesudah pengumuman buyback tidak menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan. Untuk trading volume activity juga tidak ditemukan perbedaan yang signifikan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa pengumuman buyback saham tahun 2020 tidak memberikan keuntungan bagi para investor.

2021 ◽  
pp. 42-48
Author(s):  
Evelin R.R Silalahi ◽  
Robasa Inriani Sianturi

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh pengumuman dividen tunai terhadap abnormal return saham dan trading volume activity sebelum dan sesudah pengumuman dividen. Populasi penelitian ini adalah semua perusahaan keuangan yang terdaftar di BEI di tahun 2016-2019. Sampel pada penelitian ini didapatkan dengan cara purposive sampling, dengan jumlah sampel 20 perusahaan. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik dokumentasi. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah uji paired sample t-test dengan menggunakan program SPSS 24. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Pengumuman dividen tunai tidak berpengaruh terhadap abnormal return, hal ini dibuktikan dengan hasil uji paired sample t-test dengan tingkat signifikansi 0,948 (0,948>0,05) yang berarti tidak terdapat perbedaan rata-rata abnormal return yang signifikan antara sebelum dan sesudah pengumuman dividen tunai. (2) Pengumuman dividen tunai tidak berpengaruh terhadap trading volume activity, hal ini dibuktikan dengan hasil uji paired sample t- test dengan tingkat signifikasi 0,607 (0,607>0,05) yang berarti tidak terdapat perbedaan rata-rata trading volume activity yang signifikan antara sebelum dan sesudah pengumuman dividen saham. Kata kunci: Dividen tunai, Abnormal Return, dan Trading Volume Activity.


2018 ◽  
pp. 1870
Author(s):  
Ika Putri Adnyani ◽  
Gayatri Gayatri

This research is conducted on all acquisition companies that conduct acquisitions listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange 2011-2016 period. Sampling method using purposive sampling. The number of samples of this research is 50 companies. The market reaction in this study used abnormal return and trading volume activity. The testing of information content will be done by looking at differences in cumulative abnormal return and the average trading volume of shares five days before and five days after the announcement of the acquisition. Data analysis technique used is paired sample t-test. Based on the test results, found there are significant differences in the abnormal return of the acquirer company before and after the announcement of the acquisition. However, there is no difference in trading volume activity of the acquirer's stock before and after the acquisition announcement   Keywords: acquisitions, stock market, abnormal return, trading volume activity


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suharyati Suharyati ◽  
Sri Hermuningsih

The purpose of this study to analyze the differences abnormal return and trading volume activity before and after pilpres 9 July 2014, at the company Bakrie Group and MNC Group. The results show: (1) There are no differences in average abnormal return before and after pilpres 9 Juli 2014 on the company Bakrie Group and MNC Group.The absence of a difference is becausereaction IDX to the pilpres 9 July 2014 is instantaneous and not prolonged. (2) There are no differences inaveragetrading volume activitybefore and after pilpres 9 Juli 2014 on the company Bakrie Group, but there are differences in average trading volume activitybefore and after pilpres 9 July 2014 on the companyMNC Group. The discrepancies in the company MNC Group is because investors MNC Group took profit rollicking tacking. While no differences in the company Bakrie Group is because investors Bakrie Group are not bothered by pilpres 9 July 2014. (3) The Company is more affected by pilpres 9 July 2014 is a company owned by MNC Group. Keywords: Abnormal Return,TradingVolumeActivity, Pilpres 9 July 2014.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1093-1102
Author(s):  
Endang Tri Widyarti ◽  
Sugeng Wahyudi ◽  
Hersugondo Hersugondo

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-198
Author(s):  
I Komang Wisnu Wardhana ◽  
Hermanto Hermanto ◽  
I Nyoman Nugraha AP

The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in the average abnormal return and trading volume activity before and after the enactment of the tax amnesty law on the LQ-45 index. The type of data used in this study is secondary data with data collection techniques using the documentation method. Determination of the sample in this study using purposive sampling method with certain criteria so as to obtain 45 samples. The analytical technique used in this research is paired sample t-test with an observation period of 10 days. The results of this study indicate that: (1) There is no difference in the average abnormal return before and after the enactment of the tax amnesty law. (2) There is no difference in the average trading volume activity before and after the enactment of the tax amnesty law. 


Author(s):  
Muhammad Falih Ariyanto

This research is an empirical study to analyze international event and its impacts on Indonesian capital market. The international event in this study is expansionary monetary policy issued by the Federal Reserve in the form of quantitative easing policies that were announced in three stages, on 26 November 2008, 4 November 2010, and 14 September 2012 (Indonesia Stock Exchange trading day). The study analyzed the abnormal return and trading volume activity occured at each event period. Observation period in this study used 120-day estimation period and 11-day event period at each stage of the quatitative easing announcement. The event study was done in Indonesian capital market represented by 127 shares that are catagorized as LQ45 index and actively traded in each event period. The assumption that Indonesian capital market is co-integrated with international capital market can make the announcement of quantitative easing policy as positive information for investors in Indonesia. The analysis results show that a significant positive abnormal return around the event date and a significant increase in the intensity trading activities after the quantitative easing announcement, occured. The market test results show that Indonesian capital market has efficient information in a semi-strong form, so that the investors cannot use the published information to get profits (positive abnormal return) in a long run (around the date of the event only).   Abstrak Penelitian ini merupakan studi empiris untuk menganalisis peristiwa internasional dan dampaknya terhadap pasar modal Indonesia. Peristiwa internasional yang diteliti adalah pengumuman kebijakan moneter ekspansif yang dikeluarkan oleh Bank Sentral Amerika Serikat, yaitu quantitative easing yang dilakukan dalam tiga tahapan pengumuman pada tanggal 26 November 2008, 4 November 2010 dan 14 September 2012 (hari perdagangan bursa di Indonesia). Penelitian dilakukan dengan menganalisis abnormal return dan trading volume activity yang terjadi disetiap periode peristiwa. Penelitian ini menggunakan periode pengamatan yang terdiri dari 120 hari periode estimasi dan 11 hari periode peristiwa disetiap tahapan pengumuman quantitative easing. Analisis studi peristiwa dilakukan pada pasar modal Indonesia yang diwakili oleh 127 saham yang pernah masuk dalam kategori indeks LQ45 dan secara aktif diperdagangkan disetiap periode peristiwa. Asumsi bahwa pasar modal Indonesia terkointegrasi dengan pasar modal internasional menyebabkan pengumuman kebijakan quantitative easing dapat menjadi informasi yang positif bagi pemodal di Indonesia. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa terjadi abnormal return positif yang signifikan di sekitar tanggal peristiwa dan peningkatan intensitas perdagangan yang signifikan setelah peristiwa pengumuman kebijakan quantitative easing. Hasil pengujian efisiensi pasar menunjukkan bahwa pasar modal Indonesia efisien secara informasi dalam bentuk setengah kuat sehingga pemodal tidak dapat menggunakan informasi yang dipublikasikan untuk mendapatkan keuntungan (abnormal return positif) dalam jangka waktu yang lama (hanya di sekitar tanggal peristiwa).


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 988
Author(s):  
I Putu Agus Ary Raditya Juliana ◽  
Ica Rika Candraningrat

The purpose of this study is to determine the market reaction to the announcement of cash dividends, by looking at differences in abnormal return and trading volume activity before and after the cash dividend announcement. Dividend announcement is an event that affects the market, because the company provides information to the public. Information provided by the company will influence investors' decision making and will act on that information. The sample of this study amounted to 33 of the 100 companies incorporated in the Kompas 100 index on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The data collection method uses non-participant observation, which is document observation. The analysis technique used is Paired-Sample T Test and Wilcoxon-Signed Rank Test. The results showed that there were no differences in abnormal returns and trading volume activity before and after the distribution of cash dividends. Keywords: cash dividend, abnormal return, trading volume activity


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 340
Author(s):  
Fitri Astuti ◽  
Anggi Setya Prayoga

This study intends to examine the differences in market reaction around the announcement of the Annual Report Award which is not only measured by abnormal return but is also measured using trading volume activity and stock prices. The data used are quantitative data in the form of a list of companies that received the Annual Report Award for the 2015-2018 period, the daily closing price of the ARA-winning company in the event window, the composite stock price index, the number of shares traded, and the number of shares outstanding. The event window is selected for 11 days because the long window period will blend with the effects of other events or confounding effects. The results of the study concluded that the market reacted around the announcement of the Annual Report Award for the 2015-2018 period measured using abnormal returns, trading volume activity, and stock prices. There is no difference in abnormal returns before and after the announcement of the 2013-2016 Annual Report Award period. Instead there are differences in trading volume activity and stock prices before and after the announcement of the Annual Report Award for the 2015-2018 period.


IQTISHODUNA ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lulu Nurul Istanti, SE., MM.,

This research presents an empirical analysis of difference between abnormal return and trading volume activity before and after earths-quake, in Yogyakarta at May 27, 2006. And examine its statistical properties. This research argues that there was difference between abnormal return and trading volume activity before and after quake. For this purpose, the mean difference test, using t-test, was applied to compare the mean value of abnormal return and trading volume activity before and after quake. The sample of this research consists of the insurance firms listed at the Jakarta Stock Exchange. Investigation on the sample firms involved periods of ten days before quake and ten days after quake. The results of this research indicate that there was no significant difference between the abnormal return and trading volume activity before and after quake. This evidence confirms that even did not positively influence abnormal return and trading volume activity as suggested theoretically.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document