scholarly journals Androgen Deficiency in Long-Term Intrathecal Opioid Administration

2014 ◽  
Vol 4;17 (4;7) ◽  
pp. E543-E548
Author(s):  
Chong H. Kim

Background: Intrathecal drug delivery of opioids is an efficient and effective treatment option for pain management in the chronic nonmalignant pain population. As with all treatments, in addition to the benefits, risks and side effects exist. One such risk in intrathecal opioids is opioid-induced androgen deficiency. Objective: This study evaluates opioid-induced androgen deficiency in long-term intrathecal opioid administration in chronic nonmalignant pain. Study Design: Case series. Sixteen consecutive patients with intrathecal drug delivery with opioids were screened for androgen deficiency. Setting: Academic university-based pain management center. Method: All the subjects were seen in a 2 month period, during a scheduled maintenance refill visit. Eight consecutive men and eight consecutive women receiving intrathecal drug delivery therapy for non-malignant chronic pain were ordered blood work and asked to complete a questionnaire. Patient and patient-related data were also collected. Results: Ten of the 16 (62.5%) patients were found to have androgen deficiency, 4 of 8 men based on free testosterone levels and 6 of 8 women based on DHEA levels. In men, erectile dysfunction correlated with endocrine dysfunction (P = 0.02) while depressive symptoms correlated in women (P = .03). Overall, 2 of the 16 patients had hydromorphone as the opioid in the intrathecal system. Both patients had normal endocrine functions. Both patients with hydromorphone were men and the use of hydromorphone showed an insignificant trend (P = 0.06). Three of the 4 men with normal endocrine functions had in addition to an opioid, bupivacaine, in the intrathecal system. The presence of bupivicaine in men was significant (P = 0.02). No women had bupivicaine while one of the 8 women had clonidine in addition to the opioid. Presence of another substance in addition to the opioid showed an insignificant trend (P = 0.08). Limitations: Study limitations include the small sample size and case series nature. Additionally the symptoms data was solely based on subjective patient reports. Conclusions: Androgen deficiency is common in patients treated with intrathecal opioids for chronic nonmalignant pain. Patients experience numerous and wide ranging symptoms. Erectile dysfunction may be more suggestive for androgen deficiency in men while complaints of depressed mood may be correlative in women. Additionally, combining bupivicaine with the intrathecal opioid may provide a protective role. Key words: Androgen deficiency, endocrine dysfunction, chronic nonmalignant pain, intrathecal opioid, intrathecal drug delivery, side effects

Author(s):  
Deepti Agarwal ◽  
Ifeyinwa C. Ifeanyi ◽  
Mercy A. Udoji

Intrathecal drug delivery (ITDD), while initially intended for terminal oncology patients suffering from cancer pain, is currently widely used for chronic nonmalignant pain states. Before intrathecal drug delivery device (IDDD) implantation, patients with nonmalignant chronic pain must be screened for psychologic, behavioral, and medical etiologies for their pain, in addition to having a documented failure of maximal medical therapy and a successful intrathecal drug trial. Classes of drugs used for intrathecal therapy include opioids, local anesthetics, adrenergic agonists, and NMDA receptor agonists. Drugs currently approved by the FDA for ITDD are morphine, ziconotide, and baclofen. Complications of IDDD implantation are surgical (bleeding, infection, CSF leak, nerve injury), mechanical (due to catheter kink, shear, or disconnection), pharmacologic (overdose, incorrect pump settings, contaminated drugs), or medical (hypogonadotropic hypogonadism).


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Elliott, MD ◽  
Erica Horton, DO ◽  
Eugene E. Fibuch, MD

The negative effects of long-term opioid administration on the body’s endocrine system have been known for decades.1,2 These effects have been observed and studied with the use of intrathecal opioids and in heroin addicts.3-9 However, they have also been noted to occur with the use of oral opioids, especially in those patients who require chronic opioids for the management of nonmalignant and cancer-associated pain.2,10-13 Epidemiologic data in recent years suggest that up to five million men with chronic nonmalignant pain suffer from opioid-induced androgen deficiency (OPIAD) in the United States.14 Therefore, it is important to understand the physiologic impact of chronic opioid administration in patients. In view of the increasing use of opioids for chronic pain, we must anticipate the potential occurrence of hypogonadism during chronic opioid therapy and monitor patients accordingly. If symptoms of endocrine dysfunction are recognized during chronic opioid therapy, appropriate evaluation, treatment, and follow-up should be instituted. This article describes a case report of a patient who suffered from a clinically significant testosterone deficiency and osteoporosis related to the use of long-term oral opioids for chronic nonmalignant pain. It also includes a review of the existing literature regarding OPIAD and provides recommendations regarding the evaluation and management of OPIAD.


1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 296-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell K. Portenoy

During the past decade, debate has intensified about the role of long-term opioid therapy in the management of chronic nonmalignant pain. Specialists in pain management have discussed the issues extensively and now generally agree that a selected population of patients with chronic pain can attain sustained analgesia without significant adverse consequences. This perspective, however, is not uniformly accepted by pain specialists and has not been widely disseminated to other disciplines or the public. Rather, the more traditional perspective, which ascribes both transitory benefit and substantial cumulative risk to long-term opioid therapy, continues to predominate. According to this perspective, the inevitability of tolerance limits the possibility of sustained efficacy, and other pharmacological properties increase the likelihood of adverse outcomes, including persistent side-effects, impairment in physical and psychosocial functioning, and addiction. If accurate, these outcomes would indeed justify the withholding of opioid therapy for all but the most extreme cases of chronic nonmalignant pain.


Pain Practice ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 379-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amol Soin ◽  
Jianguo Cheng ◽  
Lora Brown ◽  
Sami Moufawad ◽  
Nagy Mekhail

1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Bouckoms ◽  
Prakash Masand ◽  
George Murray ◽  
Edwin Cassem ◽  
Theodore Stern ◽  
...  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 515-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Z Herring ◽  
Leonardo A Frizon ◽  
Olivia Hogue ◽  
Jay U Mejia ◽  
Richard Rosenquist ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Elmar M. Delhaas ◽  
Daniëlle M.E. van Assema ◽  
Alida C. Fröberg ◽  
Ben G.J.C. Zwezerijnen ◽  
Biswadjiet S. Harhangi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document