scholarly journals Women Entrepreneurship – Apposite Response to Gender Prejudice

sjesr ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-99
Author(s):  
Najia Shaikh ◽  
Mehtab Begum Siddiqui ◽  
Zareen Qadeer

This assessment hopes to examine perhaps the guideline monetary and parties on the planet: the ascending of the miracle of female endeavor. Ladies' initiating soul ought to be viewed as discrete for two standard reasons: a. Ladies' business is a basic wellspring of cash related headway in work creation and natural unanticipated turn of events: ladies offer various reactions for the board and business issues; (b) low (b). Ladies' endeavor is dismissed, particularly in business research. While there were no fluttering chances for people in the economy, progress towards this objective can be enabled through an unmatched enthusiasm for the effect of ladies' endeavor on society and their commitment to money-related new development. The appraisal analyzed the improvement of female endeavor is made and non-current nations, inspected the rule persuasive and different parts influencing ladies' business, penniless down the vital knot for ladies monetary trained professionals, lastly gained thoughts to policymakers to headway and backing these exercises.

2020 ◽  

India happens to be the third largest startup ecosystem in the world, in spite of this only 9% of startup founders are women (Source: Forbes article). The statement is enough to stir thoughts regarding the state of women owned business in the country. Considering the gender prejudice prevalent in our society it is important that the challenges and problems of women owned business are paid its due attention. This descriptive study highlights the work contributing to the various aspects of state of women entrepreneurship and lists the various challenges faced by a women entrepreneur at various levels. Further the study suggests constructive suggestion to deal with the stated problems and challenges and promote women participation in Indian entrepreneurial system


Author(s):  
Virginia TASSINARI ◽  
Ezio MANZINI ◽  
Maurizio TELI ◽  
Liesbeth HUYBRECHTS

The issue of design and democracy is an urgent and rather controversial one. Democracy has always been a core theme in design research, but in the past years it has shifted in meaning. The current discourse in design research that has been working in a participatory way on common issues in given local contexts, has developed an enhanced focus on rethinking democracy. This is the topic of some recent design conferences, such PDC2018, Nordes2017 and DRS2018, and of the DESIS Philosophy Talk #6 “Regenerating Democracy?” (www.desis-philosophytalks.org), from which this track originates. To reflect on the role and responsibility of designers in a time where democracy in its various forms is often put at risk seems an urgent matter to us. The concern for the ways in which the democratic discourse is put at risk in many different parts of the word is registered outside the design community (for instance by philosophers such as Noam Chomsky), as well as within (see for instance Manzini’s and Margolin’s call Design Stand Up (http://www.democracy-design.org). Therefore, the need to articulate a discussion on this difficult matter, and to find a common vocabulary we can share to talk about it. One of the difficulties encountered for instance when discussing this issue, is that the word “democracy” is understood in different ways, in relation to the traditions and contexts in which it is framed. Philosophically speaking, there are diverse discourses on democracy that currently inspire design researchers and theorists, such as Arendt, Dewey, Negri and Hardt, Schmitt, Mouffe, Rancière, Agamben, Rawls, Habermas, Latour, Gramsci, whose positions on this topic are very diverse. How can these authors guide us to further articulate this discussion? In which ways can these philosophers support and enrich design’s innovation discourses on design and democracy, and guide our thinking in addressing sensitive and yet timely questions, such as what design can do in what seems to be dark times for democracy, and whether design can possibly contribute to enrich the current democratic ecosystems, making them more strong and resilient?


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 257-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirzad Azad

In spite of her troubled presidency at home and premature, ignominious exit from power, Park Geun-hye made serious attempts to bolster the main direction of the Republic of Korea’s (ROK) foreign policy toward the Middle East. A collaborative drive for accomplishing a new momentous boom was by and large a dominant and recurring theme in the Park government’s overall approach to the region. Park enjoyed both personal motivation as well as politico-economic justifications to push for such arduous yet potentially viable objective. Although the ROK’s yearning for a second boom in the Middle East was not ultimately accomplished under the Park presidency, nonetheless, the very aspiration played a crucial role in either rekindling or initiating policy measures in South Korea’s orientation toward different parts of a greater Middle East region, extending from the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) to Morocco.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document