Classification of potato cultivars by their nitrogen use efficiency

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Dan-Dan HE ◽  
Li-Guo JIA ◽  
Yong-Lin QIN ◽  
Ming-Shou FAN
2004 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 589-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Zebarth ◽  
G. Tai ◽  
R. Tarn ◽  
H. de Jong ◽  
P. H. Milburn

One approach for reducing the contribution of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production to nitrate contamination of groundwater is to develop cultivars which utilize N more efficiently. In this study, variation in N use efficiency (NUE; dry matter production per unit crop N supply) characteristics of 20 commercial potato cultivars of North American and European origin were evaluated in 2 yr. Cultivars were grown with or without application of 100 kg N ha-1 as ammonium nitrate banded at planting. The recommended within-row spacing was used for each cultivar and no irrigation was applied. Plant dry matter and N accumulation were determined prior to significant leaf senescence. Crop N supply was estimated as fertilizer N applied plus soil inorganic N measured at planting plus apparent net soil N mineralization. Nitrogen use efficiency decreased curvilinearly with increasing crop N supply. Nitrogen use efficiency was lower for early-maturing cultivars compared to mid-season and late-maturing cultivars. A curvilinear relationship was obtained between plant dry matter accumulation and plant N accumulation using data for all cultivars. Deviations from this relationship were interpreted as variation in N utilization efficiency (NUtE; dry matter accumulation per unit N accumulation). Significant differences in NUtE were measured among cultivars of similar maturity. Nitrogen uptake efficiency (NUpE; plant N content per unit crop N supply) and soil nitrate concentration measured at plant harvest were uniformly low for all cultivars when crop N supply was limited, but varied among cultivars when N was more abundant. This suggests that potato cultivars vary more in terms of N uptake capacity (plant N accumulation in the presence of an abundant N supply) than in terms of NUpE. Key words: Solanum tuberosum, N mineralization, dry matter accumulation, N accumulation, N utilization efficiency


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baye Berihun Getahun ◽  
Molla Mekonen Kassie ◽  
Richard G. F. Visser ◽  
C. Gerard van der Linden

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (07) ◽  
pp. 933-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Cezar Rezende Fontes ◽  
◽  
Heder Braun ◽  
Marcelo Cleón de Castro Silva ◽  
Fabrício Silva Coelho ◽  
...  

Euphytica ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 199 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 13-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Ospina ◽  
E. T. Lammerts van Bueren ◽  
J. J. H. M. Allefs ◽  
B. Engel ◽  
P. E. L. van der Putten ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1139-1148
Author(s):  
Othman & et al.

The research work was conducted in Izra’a Research station, which affiliated to the General Commission for Scientific Agricultural Research (GCSAR), during the growing seasons (2016 – 2017; 2017 – 2018), in order to evaluate the response of two durum wheat verities (Douma3 and Cham5) and two bread wheat varieties (Douma4 and Cham6) to Conservation Agriculture (CA) as a full package compared with Conventional Tillage system (CT) under rainfed condition using lentils (Variety Edleb3) in the applied crop rotation. The experiment was laid according to split-split RCBD with three replications. The average of biological yield, grain yield,  rainwater use efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency was significantly higher during the first growing season, under conservation agriculture in the presence of crop rotation, in the variety Douma3 (7466 kg. ha-1, and 4162kg. ha-1, 19.006 kg ha-1 mm-1,  39.62 kg N m-2respectively). The two varieties Douma3 and Cham6 are considered more responsive to conservation agriculture system in the southern region of Syria, because they recorded the highest grain yields (2561, 2385 kg ha-1 respectively) compared with the other studied varieties (Cham5 and Douma4) (1951 and 1724 kg ha-1 respectively). They also exhibited the highest values of both rainwater and nitrogen use efficiency.


2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Xin JU ◽  
Jin TAO ◽  
Xi-Yang QIAN ◽  
Jun-Fei GU ◽  
Bu-Hong ZHAO ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document