scholarly journals Short-course lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma— a single-centre pragmatic study

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 361 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.M. Jose ◽  
K. Pavithran ◽  
T.S. Ganesan
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Purpose We assessed response to treatment, toxicity, time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma who were ineligible for or unwilling to undergo transplantation and who were treated with a combination of lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone for a fixed 6 cycles in a resource-constrained environment.Methods This pragmatic study, conducted in a single tertiary cancer centre in South India, enrolled patients from May 2009 till April 2011. Treatment included lenalidomide 25 mg daily for 21 days, with dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle, for 6 cycles. Response was evaluated after the 3rd and 6th cycles of treatment. All patients were followed for 5 years.Results The study enrolled 51 patients. Median age in the group was 61 years (range: 38–76 years). Immunoglobulin G or A myeloma constituted 70.6% of the diagnoses, and light-chain myeloma constituted 29.4%. Stages i, ii, and iii (International Staging System) disease constituted 21.4%, 28.6%, and 50% of the diagnoses respectively. All patients were transplantation-eligible, but 34 (66.7%) refused for economic reasons. After treatment, 19.6% of the patients achieved a stringent complete response; 35.3%, a complete response; 5.9%, a very good partial response; and 29.4%, a partial response, for an overall response rate of 90.2%. Stable disease was seen in 3.9% of patients, and progressive disease, in 5.9%. Grade 3 or greater nonhematologic and hematologic toxicity occurred in 35.2% and 11.7% of patients respectively. Pulmonary embolism occurred in 1 patient. No patient experienced deep-vein thrombosis or peripheral neuropathy. The median follow-up duration was 66 months. All patients experienced disease progression. Median progression-free survival was 16 months. In 10 patients, re-challenge with lenalidomide and dexamethasone achieved a second complete response. At the time of writing, 19 patients had died. The overall survival rate at 5 years was 62.74%. Median overall survival is not yet reached.Conclusions In a resource-constrained setting, lenalidomide with low-dose dexamethasone is an effective treatment with acceptable toxicity in patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma and not planned for transplantation. Complete responses were significantly more frequent than reported in the Western literature. Occurrence of clinical deep-vein thrombosis was rare, but hyperglycemia was common. An abbreviated course of treatment is suboptimal in multiple myeloma. Maintenance regimens should be advocated.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone with and without Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Interim Study Results,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4142-4142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijun Dai ◽  
Amy O'Sullivan ◽  
Ryan Kennedy ◽  
Mohammad Abbas ◽  
Yongli Shuai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 4142 Introduction: High dose chemotherapy combined with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as opposed to conventional chemotherapy improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM) and is currently the standard of care for newly diagnosed MM patients less than 65 years old. Over the last decade, novel agents such as lenalidomide or bortezomib have dramatically improved MM outcomes with similar response rates as ASCT and the role of upfront ASCT has become more controversial. Therefore the goal of this randomized clinical trial is to determine the role of upfront ASCT in newly diagnosed myeloma patients receiving novel agent lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone induction. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with newly confirmed, measurable MM in stage 2 and 3 (Salmon Durie) and meeting CRAB criteria were enrolled. Patients were randomized to transplant (Arm A) or to non-transplant (Arm B). Patients in Arm A received 4 cycles of lenalidomide (25mg days 1 – 21) plus low-dose dexamethasone (40mg days 1,8,15,22) followed by ASCT conditioned with 200 mg/m2 melphalan (LD+ASCT); Arm B patients received 8 cycles of lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (LD alone). Both arms received stem cell collection after 4 cycles of therapy if patients achieved at least a partial remission (PR). Patients with stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) went off study. The primary objective was to compare best response. The secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and evaluation of secondary malignancies in both arms. Results: From February 2008 to May 2011, 44 patients with newly diagnosed MM were randomized. The patient characteristics were as follow: median age of the patients was 61.7 years (range 48∼75), 45.5% female and 55.5% male patients, ISS stage I 31%, II 51% and III 18%. 40 patients were eligible for evaluation and 20 patients were randomized to Arm A or Arm B, respectively. The data were analyzed according to latest IMWG response criteria (Blood. 2011 May 5;117(18):4691–5). In an intention to treat analysis, patients in Arm A (LD + ASCT), achieved a 100% Overall Response Rate (ORR) with 40% PR (n=8) and 60% Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) (n=12). In Arm B (LD only) the ORR was 75% (n=15), including 15% CR (n=3), 35% VGPR (n=7), 25% PR (n=5), 20% SD (n=4) and 5% PD (n=1). The ORR was significantly superior in the LD+ASCT group compared to LD alone (p=0.047). After a median follow-up of 25.3 months, 17 patients have PD (8 in LD+ASCT and 9 in LD alone), 6 have died (1 in LD+ASCT and 5 in LD alone). DOR, PFS and OS were not significantly different in both groups. OS showed a trend to be superior in patients treated with LD+ASCT (p=0.08). (Table 1). One patient in the LD+ASCT arm developed MDS 13 months after start of therapy. Conclusion: Our interim analysis of an ongoing clinical study suggests that treatment of newly diagnosed MM patients with lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone induction followed by upfront ASCT resulted in significantly improved ORR. There was no difference in terms of DOR or PFS with a trend of superior OS in the LD+ASCT group. The study requires careful interpretation based on the low patient number and relatively short follow up, but supports the continued role of upfront consolidative ASCT in newly diagnosed MM patients. The incidence of secondary malignancy was low with the development of 1 MDS. Updated data on response and overall survival will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures: Roodman: Amgen: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Raptis:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Speakers Bureau. Lentzsch:Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; prIME Oncology: Honoraria; Imedex: Honoraria; Clinical Care Options: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Subcutaneous Administration of Bortezomib in Combination with Thalidomide and Dexamethasone for Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shenghao Wu ◽  
Cuiping Zheng ◽  
Songyan Chen ◽  
Xiaoping Cai ◽  
Yuejian Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Subcutaneous Administration ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The Other ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Objective. To investigate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of the newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients with the therapy of subcutaneous (subQ) administration of bortezomib and dexamethasone plus thalidomide (VTD) regimen.Methods. A total of 60 newly diagnosed MM patients were analyzed. 30 patients received improved VTD regimen (improved VTD group) with the subQ injection of bortezomib and the other 30 patients received conventional VTD regimen (VTD group).The efficacy and safety of two groups were analyzed retrospectively.Results. The overall remission (OR) after eight cycles of treatment was 73.3% in the VTD group and 76.7% in the improved VTD group (P>0.05). No significant differences in time to 1-year estimate of overall survival (72% versus 75%,P=0.848) and progression-free survival (median 22 months versus 25 months;P=0.725) between two groups. The main toxicities related to therapy were leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, asthenia, fatigue, and renal and urinary disorders. Grade 3 and higher adverse events were significantly less common in the improved VTD group (50%) than VTD group (80%,P=0.015).Conclusions. The improved VTD regimen by changing bortezomib from intravenous administration to subcutaneous injection has noninferior efficacy to standard VTD regimen, with an improved safety profile and reduced adverse events.

Prognostic Value of Syndecan-1 in Multiple Myeloma and its Relationship with Other Prognostic Factors.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2402-2402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Emily Blood ◽  
Martin M. Oken ◽  
Philip R. Greipp
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Bone Disease ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Type I ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Clinical Markers ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: Syndecan-1 (CD138) is a heparan sulfate bearing proteoglycan found on various epithelial cells as well as on B lineage cells depending on its stage of development. Syndecan-1 (CD138) is abundantly expressed by plasma cells, especially myeloma cells. The extra cellular domain along with the heparan sulfate side chains can be cleaved off the cell surface and can be detected in the serum as soluble syndecan. Syndecan possibly plays a multifunctional role in the biology of myeloma. It has been shown to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with multiple myeloma. It has also been shown to promote myeloma cell growth through different mechanisms. Its expression has also been suggested to correlate with bone disease in MM. Methods: In this study we studied serum levels of soluble syndecan in newly diagnosed MM patients enrolled in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) E9486 and its associated correlative laboratory clinical trial E9487. We evaluated the prognostic value of syndecan in MM and its relationship to other known prognostic factors for this disease. In addition, syndecan levels were correlated with clinical and laboratory markers of bone disease. Results: A total of 501 patients were studied and the median serum syndecan-1 was 158 ng/mL. Syndecan levels correlated positively with other prognostic factors and markers of tumor burden such as β2-microglobulin (correlation coefficient 0.3; P <0.00001), labeling index (0.25; <0.0001), creatinine (0.23; <0.0001), soluble IL6 receptor (0.3; <0.0001), BM plasma cell percentage (0.16; <0.0006), and disease stage (P=0.0007). Significant differences in the overall and progression free survival was found between two groups of patient separated using the median value as cut-off. The High syndecan group had a median overall survival of 36.3 months compared to 49.3 months for the low syndecan group (P < 0.0001). Similarly, the high syndecan group had progression free survival of 25.4 months compared to 33.5 months for the low syndecan group (P < 0.0001). In a proportional hazards model including syndecan-1 as well as labeling index, β2M, Platelet count, IL-6R, syndecan-1 retained its prognostic value for overall survival (HR 1.3, P = 0.021). Syndecan levels were correlated with various bone markers including C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), osteocalcin (OC), C-terminal type I procollagen (PICP), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), and tartrate resistant alkaline phosphatase (TRAP) and were found to correlate only with ICTP (0.25, P < 0.0001). No correlation was found between clinical markers of bone disease including presence of lytic lesions, osteoporosis and pathologic fractures on X-rays or bone pain. Conclusion: In this large study, we once again confirm the prognostic value of serum syndecan-1 levels in large group of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Syndecan-1 level correlates with other disease markers. Syndecan levels also correlated with ICTP, a marker of bone turnover, though no strong correlation was found between syndecan levels and clinical markers of myeloma bone disease. The biological basis of these finding needs further evaluation.

Thalidomide Plus Dexamethasone for Untreated Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients and Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5093-5093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor H. Jiménez ◽  
Virginia J. Domínguez ◽  
Eduardo E. Reynoso
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Oral Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background The combination of thalidomide/dexamethasone (TD) induces remission in approximately 70% of previously untreated patients with low or intermediate tumor mass. TD appeared superior to previous programs because of the high response rate and reasonable survival and its low frequency of serious complications. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of thalidomide plus dexamethasone as first line therapy and the incidence of deep vein thrombosis. Material and methods Patients with newly diagnosed and symptomatic MM (untreated patients) were evaluated. We enrolled all patients who fulfilled entire criteria for multiple myeloma between January 1998 and December 2005. Patients were divided into 2 groups: thalidomide plus dexamethasone (TD) and VAD group. The present study is a prospective, descriptive, longitudinal and observational one. Thalidomide was prescribed in an oral dose of 100 mg qhs and increased by 50 mg every 7 days to a maximum dose of 300 mg, depending on side effects. Dexamethasone was given in an oral dose of 20 mg/m2 each morning after breakfast on days 1–4, 9–12 and 17–20, followed by 10 days without therapy prior to the next cycle. Treatment with the combination was continued for at least 6 months or until the earliest occurance of maximum plateau of myeloma protein reduction, autologous transplant-supported intensification or other treatments. VAD was given as an Out-patient regimen including: vincristine (0.4mg/day, continuous IV), doxorubicin (9mg/m2/day, continuous IV) and dexamethasone (40 mg/day PO) with a median of 6 courses. Citrate plasma was used to investigate coagulation and anticoagulation parameters. Results Sixty newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients were included in the study, 35 (58%) male and 25 (42%) female, aged 45–85 (mean 63). Underlying diagnosis was IgG MM in 44 (73.3%), IgA in 12 (20%) and light chain disease in 4 (6.7%). Clinical characteristics were similar for both groups. According to Durie Salmon criteria patients were grouped into: IA (n6, 10%), IB (n3, 5%), IIA (n12, 20%), IIB (n6, 10%), IIIA (n19, 31.6%) and IIIB (n14, 23.4%). The frequency of response (CR, NCR/VGPR and PR) in the group of thalidomide and dexamethasone was 73% being higher than VAD (53%)p0.005. CR was observed in 5 patients treated with thalidomide/dexamethasone (16%). Thrombosis complications DVT was observed in 7 patients. DVT occurred in 4 patients treated with TD and 3 with VAD. From the last 40 patients, 5 presented APC-R and 3 of them developed DVT. A significant shorter time to DVT was observed in patients exposed to VAD chemotherapy (first 2 cycles p 0.007). Patients developing APC-R were tested for Factor V Leiden mutation resulting negative. After patients developed any response criteria were retested for acquired activated protein C resistance, all of them went back to normal. Finally we conclude TD is an effective, less toxic therapy in comparison with VAD as first line therapy and in order to reduce incidence of DVT effective prophylactic anticoagulation should be implemented in all controlled trials, at least during the first few cycles of treatment.

Rapid Control of Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma with Bortezomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (BLD).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3611-3611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Wang ◽  
Kay Delasalle ◽  
Sergio Giralt ◽  
Raymond Alexanian
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Intensive Therapy ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Short Exposure ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Introduction: Both bortezomib (B) and lenalidomide (L) are effective against relapsed/refractory and newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). The 3-drug combination of bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone had induced remission in 87% of patients with untreated myeloma, significantly higher than the frequency of 66% observed with thalidomide dexamethasone. Patients and Method: We conducted a retrospective review of a pilot study in 17 previously-untreated patients with MM who were treated with bortezomib-lenalidomide dexamethasone between 4/06–4/07. Median age was 60 (35–71), median B2M was 3.7 mg/L (1.8–11.7) and median Hgb was 11 g/dl (6–14.7). Serum creatinine was greater than 2 mg/dl in one patient (6%). Bortezomib was given at 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1,4, 8 and 11; lenalidomide was at 25 mg orally daily for 21 days; and dexamethasone was at 20 mg/m2 daily orally for 4 days beginning on days 1, 9 and 17. Each cycle was 28 days. After the first cycle, a second cycle was given to 10 patients so that the median cycles of therapy was 2. As prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis, all patients received warfarin with a targeted INR range between 2–3. All patients received daily orally vancyclovir to prevent herpes zoster. Results: Applying the Blade criteria of response (PR: greater than 50% reduction of serum myeloma protein and/or greater than 90% reduction of Bence Jones protein), remission of disease was observed in 14/17 patients (82%), including 2 patients (12%) with CR based on negative immunofixations and 12 patients (70%) with PR. All but one patient achieved remission after 1 cycle of treatment. Three patients were resistant to bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone after 2 cycles. One patient had deep vein thrombosis with pulmonary emboli. One patient had short-term grade 3 neuropathy. One patient had grade 3 thrombocytopenia and one patient had nonneutropenic pneumonia. Median nadir neutrophil count was 3000/ul (range 1400–5400/ul), and median nadir platelet count was 174 k/ul (range 38–270 k/ul). After a median 3.6 months (range 3.3–5.5), intensive therapy supported by autologous blood stem cells was given to 11 patients. Three of the 11 patients in PR after induction with bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone were converted to CR with intensification. Consequently, the CR rate after intensification 29%. Intensification is planned for the 3 patients with primary resistant MM. Discussion: Overall response and CR rates were similar to those observed previously among similar patients treated with bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone. All reported primary treatment programs based on bortezomib-dexamethasone have induced high response rates of 82–92%, regardless of whether melphalan, lenalidomide, or thalidomide were included. Conclusions: One or two cycles of bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone were associated with rapid onset of response in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma. Toxicity was infrequent due to short exposure to bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone. There was early access to intensive therapy supported by autologous stem cells. Reduced exposure to drugs given as primary treatment should help preserve disease sensitivity to later treatment upon relapse.

Elevated Levels of Circulating Nucleosomes Are Not Associated with Venous Thrombosis or Neutrophil Activation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 274-274
Author(s):  
Mandy N. Lauw ◽  
Frank W.G. Leebeek ◽  
Moniek P.M. de Maat ◽  
Gerard J. van Mierlo ◽  
Saskia Middeldorp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Human Neutrophil ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Neutrophil Activation ◽  
Extracellular Dna ◽  
Human Neutrophil Elastase ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are at a 9-fold increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Mechanisms underlying the increased VTE risk in MM have not yet been clarified. Recently, extracellular DNA, e.g. nucleosomes, has been shown to play a central role in coagulation activation and propagation in vivo and in animal models. Increased nucleosome levels were demonstrated in patients with VTE, supporting their role in VTE development. The prothrombotic activity of nucleosomes may be of importance in systemic inflammatory states, in which activated immune cells can release nucleosomes, such as neutrophils by forming neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). However, during inflammation and upon chemotherapy, parenchymal cells and tumor cells, respectively, can also release extracellular DNA in the form of nucleosomes, which could promote coagulation. As MM is regarded as a systemic inflammatory disease, we hypothesized to find elevated levels of nucleosomes in MM patients, with an association between the highest levels of nucleosomes and development of VTE. Therefore, we assessed levels of nucleosomes and neutrophil activation, and their association with VTE, in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed MM. Methods: We assessed levels of circulating nucleosomes and systemic neutrophil activation, by presence of elastase-α1-antitrypsin (EA) complexes, in 131 patients with newly diagnosed MM using plasma samples. Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 levels were also assessed to estimate the inflammatory state. We used a case-cohort design to investigate the association between nucleosomes, neutrophil activation and VTE, by calculating odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using nucleosomes and EA complexes as categorical variables, based on the 80th percentile for MM patients without VTE, with ≤80th percentile being the reference category. To compare levels of nucleosomes and neutrophil activation complexes in MM patients with patients with other malignancies, a comparison was made with a cohort of cases with objectified deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) of the leg and screened controls without DVT, stratified by malignancy status. Results: 19 of 131 MM patients (14.5%) developed VTE during MM treatment. Levels of nucleosomes (median 39.5 U/mL; interquartile range [IQR] 7.9-156.8, vs. median 25.6 U/mL; IQR 10.9-76.4; p=0.61) and neutrophil activation, as evidenced by presence of EA complexes (median 30.1 U/mL; IQR 22.6-39.3, vs. median 31.6 U/mL; IQR 24.3-46.0; p=0.45), did not differ between MM patients with and without VTE. No association was found between high levels (>80th percentile of non-VTE MM patients) of nucleosomes or neutrophil activation, and VTE (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.2-1.6, and OR 2.1; 95% CI 0.5-9.7, respectively) in MM patients. IL-6 and IL-8 levels were low in all MM patients, irrespective of VTE. Nucleosome levels were similarly high in MM patients compared with DVT patients with other malignancies, and significantly higher compared with DVT patient without malignancies, and with DVT controls, irrespective of malignancy status (Fig. 1A). In contrast, levels of neutrophil activation were significantly lower in MM patients in all comparisons (Fig. 1B). Conclusions: Elevated levels of nucleosomes were found in MM patients, but without correlating high levels of neutrophil activation. Nucleosome levels in MM patients with and without VTE were similar, and there was no association between high levels of circulating nucleosomes or neutrophil activation, and VTE in MM patients. Our results suggest that elevated levels of nucleosomes in MM patients are independent of neutrophil activation or inflammatory status, but rather a marker of plasma cell injury or death. This could also explain absence of a clear association with VTE. Future studies are necessary to confirm the source and the clinical relevance of high levels of nucleosomes in MM patients. Figure 1 Levels of nucleosomes and neutrophil activation (by presence of human neutrophil elastase-α1-antitrypsin (EA) complexes) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), compared with cases with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the leg with other malignancies or without malignancies, and DVT controls with other malignancies or without malignancies Median levels of circulating nucleosomes (1A), and median levels of EA complexes (1B). Bars represent median with interquartile ranges (IQR). Figure 1. Levels of nucleosomes and neutrophil activation (by presence of human neutrophil elastase-α1-antitrypsin (EA) complexes) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), compared with cases with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the leg with other malignancies or without malignancies, and DVT controls with other malignancies or without malignancies. / Median levels of circulating nucleosomes (1A), and median levels of EA complexes (1B). Bars represent median with interquartile ranges (IQR). Disclosures Leebeek: Baxter: Research Funding; UniQure: Consultancy; Netherlands Hemophilia Foundation: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding.

Targeting Complete Response with Upfront Bortezomib Followed By Autologous Transplantation and Consolidation Therapy for Untreated Multiple Myeloma (TUBA study)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3463-3463
Author(s):  
Hideki Nakasone ◽  
Kiriko Terasako-Saito ◽  
Teiichi Hirano ◽  
Atsushi Wake ◽  
Seiichi Shimizu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Induction Phase ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract [Background] Multiple myeloma (MM) is generally considered incurable. Recently, novel drugs, including bortezomib, have demonstrated a survival benefit for newly diagnosed MM patients compared with classical treatments. Complete response (CR) after treatment is known to be associated with superior progression-free survival. Thus, we prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of boretezomib + dexamethasone (BD) for patients with newly diagnosed MM, followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We added BD consolidation therapy to aim CR if CR was not achieved after ASCT. [Patients and methods] This clinical study prospectively recruited newly diagnosed MM patients eligible for ASCT between 2010 and 2012. Due to health insurance issues in Japan, two courses of high-dose dexamethasone (HD-DX) had been administrated prior to BD induction treatment until Nov. 2011, while BD was administrated as an initial induction treatment since Dec. 2011. BD induction treatment included 1.3 mg/m2 of bortezomib on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 with 20mg of dexamethasone on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12. This BD induction cycle was repeated every 3 weeks for 4 courses. Thereafter, filgrastim-based mobilization and ASCT following high-dose melphalan administration was performed. If patients did not achieve CR after ASCT, BD consolidation therapy (bortezomib: 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15; dexamethasone 20 mg/day on days 1-2, 8-9, and 15-16) every 4 weeks was added to target CR (Figure 1) (UMIN-CTR: UMIN000002442). [Results] The median observational duration among survivors was 1536 days (range: 464-2023) at this analysis. Of the 47 enrolled MM patients, 46 (male 27; female 19) were eligible for BD induction treatment, while the remaining one achieved CR before BD induction. The median age of the patients was 59 (range: 35-67) years. Of the 44 patients whose karyotype analyses were available, normal karyotype was observed in 35. Abnormal karyotype included complex type in 4, diploid in 1, and other abnormalities in 4. FISH revealed deletion of p53 in 5 of 39 patients whose information was available; deletion of 13-chromosome in 16 of 42, IgH-MAF fusion in 1 of 40; IgH-FGFR3 fusion in 5 of 41; IgH-BCL1 fusion in 9 of 39. Of the 46 MM patients, 19 received HD-DX prior to BD induction, and 34 received ASCT after BD induction treatment (Figure 1). During the BD induction phase, 3 patients experienced disease progression, and BD treatment was discontinued in 9 patients because of their consent withdrawal (n=2) and adverse events (n=7) including interstitial pneumonia in 2, persistent neuropathy in 1, CMV enterocolitis in 1, heart failure in 1, diabetes mellitus in 1, and liver dysfunction in 1. After BD induction phase (n=46), their response was >= CR in 4 (8%), very good partial response (VGPR) in 10 (22%), partial response (PR) in 18 (39%), stable disease (SD) in 2 (4%), and progression or withdrawal in 12 (26%). After ASCT, their response was >=CR in 9 (20%), VGPR in 11 (24%), PR in 12 (26%), SD in 1 (2%), and additional progression or withdrawal in 1 (2%). Of the 24 patients who received ASCT and whose response was less than CR, 21 received BD consolidation therapy for a median of 4 courses (range: 1- 8). BD consolidation was discontinued in 4 patients due to persistent neuropathy or cytopenia. Finally, maximum response after ASCT with or without BD consolidation was >= CR in 19 (41%), VGPR in 7 (15%), PR in 6 (13%), < SD in 2 (2%, Figure 2). Through BD consolidation, CR was achieved in 8 of 11 patients with post-ASCT VGPR and 2 of 12 patients with post-ASCT PR. In total, 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 43% (95%CI: 28-57%) and 80 % (95%CI: 64-90%), respectively. Focusing on CR patients after ASCT and those who actually received BD consolidation, PFS adjusted for karyotype and age were not different between CR patients after ASCT and after BD consolidation, while patients with VGPR or less after consolidation had significantly lower PFS (Figure 3). [Conclusion] BD induction and ASCT provided CR rate of 27% among ASCT patients, although BD induction may expectedly cause adverse events including persistent neuropathy and viral infections. Patients who achieved CR after ASCT showed good PFS, and targeting CR through BD consolidation might improve CR rate. It is worthwhile to prospectively compare the efficacy of BD consolidation only for patients who failed to achieve CR or universal consolidation strategy. Disclosures Kanda: Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone-Thalidomide Followed by Maintenance With Bortezomib-Thalidomide Compared With Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Updated Follow-Up and Improved Survival

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 634-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) has improved overall survival in multiple myeloma. This randomized trial compared VMP plus thalidomide (VMPT) induction followed by bortezomib-thalidomide maintenance (VMPT-VT) with VMP in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 511 patients who were not eligible for transplantation to receive VMPT-VT (nine 5-week cycles of VMPT followed by 2 years of VT maintenance) or VMP (nine 5-week cycles without maintenance). Results In the initial analysis with a median follow-up of 23 months, VMPT-VT improved complete response rate from 24% to 38% and 3-year progression-free-survival (PFS) from 41% to 56% compared with VMP. In this analysis, median follow-up was 54 months. The median PFS was significantly longer with VMPT-VT (35.3 months) than with VMP (24.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; P < .001). The time to next therapy was 46.6 months in the VMPT-VT group and 27.8 months in the VMP group (HR, 0.52; P < .001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was greater with VMPT-VT (61%) than with VMP (51%; HR, 0.70; P = .01). Survival from relapse was identical in both groups (HR, 0.92; P = .63). In the VMPT-VT group, the most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse events included neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (22%), peripheral neuropathy (11%), and cardiologic events (11%). All of these, except for thrombocytopenia, were significantly more frequent in the VMPT-VT patients. Conclusion Bortezomib and thalidomide significantly improved OS in multiple myeloma patients not eligible for transplantation.

scholarly journals Case series: MRD negativity assessment using 11C-Acetate PET with 3-weekly daratumumab-based quadruplet induction in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204062072110303
Author(s):  
Cheong Ngai ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Garrett Chi-lai Ho ◽  
Sirong Chen ◽  
Chor-sang Chim
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Subsequent Relapse

Complete response (CR) is an important favorable factor for survival in multiple myeloma (MM). However, CR patients continue to relapse, especially in the presence of minimal residual disease (MRD). Bone marrow (BM) MRD is predictive of progression-free survival (PFS) in MM. However, myeloma outside the BM aspiration site may result in subsequent relapse despite MRD-negativity. Therefore, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) based on F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is a complementary tool to monitor residual disease in MM. However, FDG may miss myeloma lesions that are not FDG-avid. On the other hand, 11C-Acetate (ACT) has been found to be a more sensitive and specific tracer than FDG in MM. Recently, the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone (VTd) or bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (VRd) backbone has been proven to improve outcomes. Herein, we report three newly-diagnosed MM patients achieving deep responses with imaging CR using ACT PET in addition to conventional immunofixation CR and MRD-negative CR after a 3-weekly daratumumab-based quadruplet induction regimen.

Updated Outcomes and Impact of Age With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone or Melphalan, Prednisone, and Thalidomide in the Randomized, Phase III FIRST Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (30) ◽  
pp. 3609-3617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyrille Hulin ◽  
Andrew Belch ◽  
Chaim Shustik ◽  
Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽  
Ulrich Dührsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
One To One

Purpose This analysis of the FIRST trial in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) ineligible for stem-cell transplantation examined updated outcomes and impact of patient age. Patients and Methods Patients with untreated symptomatic MM were randomly assigned at a one-to-one-to-one ratio to lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone until disease progression (Rd continuous), Rd for 72 weeks (18 cycles; Rd18), or melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT; 72 weeks), stratified by age (≤ 75 v > 75 years), disease stage (International Staging System stage I/II v III), and country. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Rd continuous and MPT were primary comparators. Results Between August 21, 2008, and March 7, 2011, 1,623 patients were enrolled (Rd continuous, n = 535; Rd18, n = 541; MPT, n = 547), including 567 (35%) age older than 75 years. Higher rates of advanced-stage disease and renal impairment were observed in patients older than 75 versus 75 years of age or younger. Rd continuous reduced the risk of progression or death compared with MPT by 31% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.80; P < .001) overall, 36% (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.77; P < .001) in patients age 75 years or younger, and 20% (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.03; P = .084) in those age older than 75 years. Median overall survival was longer with Rd continuous than with MPT, including a 14-month difference in patients age older than 75 years. Progression-free survival with Rd18 was similar to that with MPT, and overall survival with Rd18 was marginally inferior to that with Rd continuous. Rates of grade 3 to 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were similar for Rd continuous–treated patients age 75 years or older and those age older than 75 years; however, older patients had more frequent lenalidomide dose reductions. Conclusion Results support Rd continuous treatment as a new standard of care for stem-cell transplantation–ineligible patients with newly diagnosed MM of all ages.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document