scholarly journals Reminiscence: Evidence for reorganization in final free recall

1976 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-339
Author(s):  
Ovid J. L. Tzeng ◽  
Barbara A. Hergatt
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nichole Bouffard ◽  
Jared Stokes ◽  
Hannah J. Kramer ◽  
Arne D. Ekstrom

1974 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 812-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory F. Mazuryk

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 1180-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel R. Kuhn ◽  
Lynn J. Lohnas ◽  
Michael J. Kahana

1989 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine G. Penney

During presentation of auditory and visual lists of words, different groups of subjects generated words that either rhymed with the presented words or that were associates. Immediately after list presentation, subjects recalled either the presented or the generated words. After presentation and test of all lists, a final free recall test and a recognition test were given. Visual presentation generally produced higher recall and recognition than did auditory presentation for both encoding conditions. The results are not consistent with explanations of modality effects in terms of echoic memory or greater temporal distinctiveness of auditory items. The results are more in line with the separate-streams hypothesis, which argues for different kinds of input processing for auditory and visual items.


1983 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank N. Dempster ◽  
William D. Rohwer

1979 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin E. Keller ◽  
Stephen M. Whitney ◽  
John H. Mueller

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document