scholarly journals Request (4) and Proposal (28): to conserve the name Molinio arundinaceae-Quercetum roboris Neuhäusl et Neuhäuslová-Novotná 1967

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 237-239
Author(s):  
Michal Slezák ◽  
Ján Kliment ◽  
Milan Valachovič

We propose (i) to select Quercus robur as the name-giving taxon of the associations Molinio arundinaceae-QuercetumSamek 1962 and Molinio arundinaceae-QuercetumNeuhäusl et Neuhäuslová-Novotná 1967 and (ii) to conserve the younger name Molinio arundinaceae-Quercetum roborisNeuhäusl et Neuhäuslová-Novotná 1967, representing hygrophytic Central European acidophilous oak forests (Quercion roboris alliance). (28) Molinio arundinaceae-QuercetumNeuhäusl et Neuhäuslová-Novotná 1967: 17–23, table 2. Typus: Neuhäusl and Neuhäuslová-Novotná (1967), table 2, rel. 11 (lectotypus; Pallas 1996: 51). (H) Molinio arundinaceae-QuercetumSamek 1962: 134–135, table V on p. 156–160. Typus: Samek (1962), Table V, rel. 28 (lectotypus; Moravec 1998: 33). Taxonomic reference: Marhold et al. (1998). Abbreviations: ICPN = International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature.

Hacquetia ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-140
Author(s):  
Peter Kučera

Abstract This paper comments on nomenclature of the name Piceion excelsae of Pawłowski et al. (1928), which should be preferably referred using the form “Piceion excelsae Pawłowski ex Pawłowski et al. 1928”. In the author’s opinion, the definition of Recommendation 46D in the current International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature (author citations with “ex”) needs to be revised to define alternatively the difference in contrast to Recommendation 46C (author citations with “in”): to highlight the difference at the place and time of the valid publication of the name handled. The equally aged name “Fagetalia sylvaticae Pawłowski ex Pawłowski et al. 1928” is invalidly published. The oldest validly published homonym found should be ascribed to Walas (1933).


2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Willner ◽  
Jean-Paul Theurillat ◽  
Andraž Čarni ◽  
Jens Pallas ◽  
Heinrich E. Weber

This paper explains how to apply for conservation or rejection of names of syntaxa according to the International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. First, authors have to submit a written proposal with all relevant details to be published in the Section “Phytosociological Nomenclature” of Phytocoenologia after formal editing. Then, from time to time, the Committee for Changes and Conservation of Names (CCCN) of the Working Group for Phytosociological Nomenclature (GPN) will evaluate the published proposals and make recommendations to accept or reject them. Finally, the GPN Assembly will vote on these recommendations and publish the decision.


2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Willner ◽  
Jean-Paul Theurillat ◽  
Jens Pallas ◽  
Ladislav Mucina

We present a detailed nomenclatural analysis of the class names Carpino-Fagetea, Querco-Fagetea, Quercetea robori-sessiliflorae, Quercetea ilicis and Vaccinio-Piceetea. The current literature presents contradictory opinions about the legitimacy and correct author citation of these names, often motivated by deviating interpretations of the International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. This primarily concerns the provisions of Articles 2b, 3j, 3m and 35 which can be interpreted in quite different ways, leading to divergent conclusions on the validity and legitimacy of a name. Thus, the problems discussed in this paper are of general relevance for phytosociological nomenclature, highlighting the need for amendments and clarifications to be implemented in the next edition of the Code. Moreover, we suggest establishing a formal procedure to request a binding decision on specific cases to stabilise the interpretation of the Code.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 74-80
Author(s):  
Tatyana Mikhaylovna Lysenko

The paper describes the study of steppe vegetation in the Samara Region. It contains results of the steppe communities field study conducted in 2014-2015 in the vicinity of Togliatti (Samara Region). Geobotanical relevs were made on standard sites for steppe vegetation. Projective covering of plant species in field conditions was estimated as a percentage and then converted to scores using B.M. Mirkins scale. The relevs are placed in the geobotanical database Vegetation of the Volga and Ural Basins and processed using the computer program JUICE. Bioindication studies were conducted using the IBIS program. As a result of the syntaxonomic analysis carried out using the floral approach to the classification of vegetation by J. Braun-Blanquet, 2 new associations and 6 new subassociations were identified. Their names are given in accordance with the International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. Their position in the system of higher syntaxons of Europe is established, nomenclature types, diagnostic types are given, composition and structure, ecology and distribution of communities are characterized as well as the results of processing according to the scales by L.G. Ramensky. The communities of all established syntaxons are recommended for inclusion in the 2nd edition of the Green Book of the Samara Region.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 37-39
Author(s):  
Erwin Bergmeier ◽  
Jean-Paul Theurillat

To comply with the International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature (ICPN), we validate the names Saturejo spinosae-Scutellarietalia hirtae, Arenarion creticae, Verbascion spinosi and Lomelosio sphacioticae-Centranthetum sieberi. Two divergent interpretations of Article 3i about the point at issue in the validation of the first three names are discussed. Syntaxonomic reference: Bergmeier (2002), unless indicated otherwise in the text.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (9) ◽  
pp. 76-83
Author(s):  
Yury Semenishchenkov ◽  

The article presents the typification and correction of the syntaxa of grass vegetation, established at different times for the Southern Nechernozemye of Russia. 3 associations and 5 subassociations are validated according to the requirements of the International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature (Theurillat et al., 2021). The description of syntaxa is given according to the plan: name, synonyms, nomenclature type (holotype or lectotype), diagnostic species (their single blocks were used without dividing into characteristic, differential and constant), definition (verbal diagnosis). The belonging of associations and subassociations to the highest classification units is indicated in accordance with the modern hierarchical system of floristic classification of vegetation in Europe (Mucina et al., 2016). All of these units belong to the group of Intrazonal boreo-temperate grasslands and heath.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 305-309
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Willner ◽  
Andraž Čarni ◽  
Federico Fernández-González ◽  
Jens Pallas ◽  
Jean Paul Theurillat

In this Report, three previously published nomenclatural proposals are discussed, and recommendations on acceptance or rejection of these proposals are provided. The proposals concern the following syntaxa: Berberidion Braun-Blanquet 1950, Aceretalia pseudoplataniMoor 1976 and Festucetalia valesiacae Braun-Blanquet et Tüxen ex Braun-Blanquet 1950. Abbreviations: CCCN = Committee for the Change and Conservation of Names; GPN = Working Group for Phytosociological Nomenclature; ICPN = International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature.


Author(s):  
Jean‐Paul Theurillat ◽  
Wolfgang Willner ◽  
Federico Fernández‐González ◽  
Helga Bültmann ◽  
Andraž Čarni ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 65-69
Author(s):  
Federico Fernández-González ◽  
Vasco Silva ◽  
Jean-Paul Theurillat

After a nomenclatural revision of the higher rank syntaxa of the class Isoeto-Nanojuncetea, the conservation of the order name Nanocyperetalia against Nanocypero-Polygonetalia and a conserved type for the order Isoetetalia are proposed. (26) NanocyperetaliaKlika 1935: 292, nom. cons. propos. Typus: Nanocyperion flavescentisKoch 1926: 20–28 (holotypus) (≡) Nanocypero-PolygonetaliaKoch 1926: 20, nom. rejic. propos. (27) IsoetetaliaBraun-Blanquet 1936a: 142, typus cons. propos. Typus: IsoetionBraun-Blanquet 1936a: 141 (typus cons. propos.) Taxonomic reference: Euro+Med (2020). Syntaxonomic reference: Mucina et al. (2016). Abbreviations: ICPN = International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document