scholarly journals Evaluation of the Correlation Between Thoracic Ultrasound and Thoracic Computed Tomography Scores of Patients with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia Receiving Intensive Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Ayşe Vahapoğlu ◽  
Döndü Genç Moralar ◽  
Ferhat Çengel ◽  
Zuhal Çavuş ◽  
Ülkü Aygen Türkmen
CHEST Journal ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (4) ◽  
pp. 596A
Author(s):  
Vinoo Ramsaran ◽  
Abubakr Bajwa ◽  
Vandana Seeram ◽  
James Cury ◽  
Faisal Usman ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Kuetting ◽  
Andreas Müller ◽  
Andreas Feisst ◽  
Julian Luetkens ◽  
Darius Dabir ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 208S
Author(s):  
Pervaiz Iqbal ◽  
Arshad Ali ◽  
Francis M. Schmidt ◽  
J. Quist ◽  
Gerald Posner ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry H. Gross ◽  
David L. Spizarny

Author(s):  
Akın Çinkooğlu ◽  
Selen Bayraktaroğlu ◽  
Naim Ceylan ◽  
Recep Savaş

Abstract Background There is no consensus on the imaging modality to be used in the diagnosis and management of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. The purpose of this study was to make a comparison between computed tomography (CT) and chest X-ray (CXR) through a scoring system that can be beneficial to the clinicians in making the triage of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia at their initial presentation to the hospital. Results Patients with a negative CXR (30.1%) had significantly lower computed tomography score (CTS) (p < 0.001). Among the lung zones where the only infiltration pattern was ground glass opacity (GGO) on CT images, the ratio of abnormality seen on CXRs was 21.6%. The cut-off value of X-ray score (XRS) to distinguish the patients who needed intensive care at follow-up (n = 12) was 6 (AUC = 0.933, 95% CI = 0.886–0.979, 100% sensitivity, 81% specificity). Conclusions Computed tomography is more effective in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia at the initial presentation due to the ease detection of GGOs. However, a baseline CXR taken after admission to the hospital can be valuable in predicting patients to be monitored in the intensive care units.


2007 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. e32 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Morrison ◽  
G. Markose ◽  
A.T. Carton ◽  
W.S. Hislop

2020 ◽  
pp. 102490792091339
Author(s):  
Seda Dağar ◽  
Emine Emektar ◽  
Hüseyin Uzunosmanoğlu ◽  
Şeref Kerem Çorbacıoğlu ◽  
Özge Öztekin ◽  
...  

Background: Despite its risks associated with renal injury, intravenous contrast media increases diagnostic efficacy and hence the chance of early diagnosis and treatment, which leaves clinicians in a dilemma regarding its use in emergency settings. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the risk and predictors of contrast-induced acute kidney injury following intravenous contrast media administration for computed tomography in the emergency department. Methods: All patients aged 18 years and older who had a basal creatinine measurement within the last 8 h before contrast-enhanced computed tomography and a second creatinine measurement within 48–72 h after computed tomography scan between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017 were included in the study. Characteristics of patients with and without contrast-induced acute kidney injury development were compared. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the predictors for contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Results: A total of 631 patients were included in the final statistical analysis. After contrast media administration, contrast-induced acute kidney injury developed in 4.9% ( n = 31) of the patients. When the characteristics of patients are compared according to the development of contrast-induced acute kidney injury, significant differences were detected for age, initial creatinine, initial estimated glomerular filtration rate, and all acute illness severity indicators (hypotension, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and need for intensive care unit admission). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. The need for intensive care unit admission (odds ratio: 6.413 (95% confidence interval: 1.709–24.074)) and hypotension (odds ratio: 5.575 (95% confidence interval: 1.624–19.133)) were the main factors for contrast-induced acute kidney injury development. Conclusion: Our study results revealed that hypotension, need for intensive care, and advanced age were associated with acute kidney injury in patients receiving contrast media. Therefore, we believe that to perform contrast-enhanced computed tomography in emergency department should not be decided only by checking for renal function tests and that these predictors should be taken into consideration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document