Kojève, Alexandre (1902–68)

Author(s):  
Michael S. Roth

Alexandre Kojève developed an idiosyncratic and widely influential reading of G.W.F. Hegel in a seminar in Paris from 1933 to 1939. Kojève read Hegel as having discovered that truth was the product of history, and that history was the product of the human desire and struggle for recognition. Kojève emphasized that once this desire was satisfied, history, properly so-called, was over. He claimed that for all essential purposes this human desire had been satisfied in the modern period, and thus that we had experienced (and Hegel had come to know) the end of history. The notes from this seminar were published in 1947 and continued to have an important impact on French philosophy throughout the post-war period.


Tekstualia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (41) ◽  
pp. 91-102
Author(s):  
Marcin Czardybon

The article concentrates on the signs of authorial presence in Michel Houellebecq’s novel The Map and the Territory, including the author’s name, achievements and emploi. A seemingly trivial procedure, so frequent in postmodern prose, in Houellebecq’s work, it becomes an important element of a complex structure, which engages in a polemic with the regime of postmodernity. The article also traces Houellebecq’s debt to major trends in European philosophy. The Map and the Territory problematizes the relationship between the original and the copy as well as the notion of the end of history. The article references, among others, Alexandre Kojève, Martin Heidegger, Plato and Jean Baudrillard.



Society ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-194
Author(s):  
Bryan-Paul Frost




Politics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
John O'Neill

Fukuyama's influential book The End of History and the Last Man presents an Hegelian picture of history as the story of the struggle for recognition. Modern liberal society is the end of history since it resolves that struggle. However, unlike Hegel, Fukuyama assumes recognition is pursued for its own sake. The assumption lends plausibility to a market model of recognition which sits uneasily with his own defence of associational spheres of existence. Hegel, in contrast, inherits an Aristotelian position according to which recognition is parasitic on other goods. This account of recognition informs Hegel's defence of an associational account of civil society and his rejection of market exchange as satisfactory site for recognition. Hegel's response to market modes of recognition is contrasted with that of Adam Smith.



1985 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Roth


Derrida Today ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-47
Author(s):  
Anne Alombert

The aim of this paper is to question the significance of Derrida's deconstruction of the concepts of subject and history. While ‘postmodernity’ tends to be characterized by philosophical critique as the ‘liquidation of the subject’ or the ‘end of history’, I attempt to show that Derrida's deconstruction of ‘subjectivity’ and ‘historicity’ is not an elimination or destruction of these concepts, but an attempt to transform them in order to free them from their metaphysical-teleological presuppositions. This paper argues that this transformation, which begins in Derrida's and continues in Stiegler's texts, leads to the notions of ‘psycho-social individuation’ and ‘doubly epokhal redoubling’. I maintain that such notions ‘supplement’ the metaphysical concepts of subject and history by forcing a reconsideration of the technical conditions of psychic individuation and the technological conditions of ‘epochality’.



2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 9-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cary Carson

Abstract Are historic sites and house museums destined to go the way of Oldsmobiles and floppy disks?? Visitation has trended downwards for thirty years. Theories abound, but no one really knows why. To launch a discussion of the problem in the pages of The Public Historian, Cary Carson cautions against the pessimistic view that the past is simply passéé. Instead he offers a ““Plan B”” that takes account of the new way that learners today organize information to make history meaningful.



2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (003) ◽  
pp. 51-65
Author(s):  
A. Kramarenko


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document