scholarly journals El régimen jurídico de los montes públicos y su inscripción en el Registro de la Propiedad: debate doctrinal e instrumentos jurídicos de protección.

2021 ◽  
pp. 347-376
Author(s):  
Carlos FERNÁNDEZ-ESPINAR MUÑOZ
Keyword(s):  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Domain ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Texts ◽  
Public Forests ◽  
Background Considerations

LABURPENA: Lan honek xedetzat du Jabetza Erregistroaren babesa aztertzea mendi publikoei eta, bereziki, jabari publikoko mendiei dagokienez. Lehenik, azterketa historiko zehatza egin dugu, eta ondoren, 1925ean sortutako doktrina-eztabaidaren garapena aztertu dugu; hau da, ea jabari publikoko mendiak inskribatu behar diren edo ez partikularren usurpazioetatik babesteko. Jarraian, funtsezko gogoeta batzuk egin ditugu administrazio-zuzenbidearen printzipio eta kontzeptuen aldetik administrazio-jakintzako doktrina akademikoa aztertuta. Lanaren bigarren zatian, batetik, hartutako irtenbidea azaldu dugu, eta bestetik, partikularren eta administrazioaren artean, mendiei dagokienez, gaur egun dauden gatazken azterketa jaso dugu, bai eta mendien eta erregistroaren arteko harremanen legezko testuen arauketarena ere. ABSTRACT: The object of this work is to study the protection of the Property Registry in relation to public forests and especially those considered of public domain. In the first place, a detailed historical analysis is carried out, to later analyze the development of the doctrinal debate that arose in 1925 on the need or not to inscribe the public domain forests in order to protect them from landgrabbings by individuals.Then, some background considerations are carried out from the principles and concepts of administrative law with an analysis of the administrative academic doctrine. The second part of the work presents the solution adopted and analyzes the current conflicts between individuals and the Administration in relation to the forests, as well as the regulation of the different legal texts of the relationships between the public forests and the Registry. RESUMEN: El presente trabajo tiene como objeto de estudio la protección del Registro de la Propiedad en relación con los montes públicos y en especial los montes de dominio público. En primer lugar, se realiza un detallado análisis histórico, para más tarde analizar el desarrollo del debate doctrinal surgido en 1925 sobre la necesidad o no de inscripción de los montes de dominio público con el fin de protegerlos de las usurpaciones de los particulares. A continuación, se llevan a cabo unas consideraciones de fondo desde los principios y conceptos del Derecho administrativo con un análisis de la doctrina académica administrativista. La segunda parte del trabajo expone la solución adoptada y analiza los conflictos actuales entre particulares y Administración en relación a los montes, así como la regulación de los distintos textos legales de las relaciones entre los montes y el Registro.

Rewritten or Reused? Originality, Intertextuality, and Reuse in the Writings of a Buddhist Visionary in Contemporary Tibet

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 203-231
Author(s):  
Antonio Terrone
Keyword(s):  
Public Domain ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Way

The study of Buddhist texts can inform us of the way scriptures were composed, as well as illuminate the reasons behind their production. This study examines the phenomenon of borrowing and reusing portions of texts without attributing them to their ‘legitimate authors’ within the Buddhist world of contemporary Tibet. It shows that not only is such a practice not at all infrequent and is often socially accepted, but that it is used in this case as a platform to advance specific claims and promote an explicit agenda. Therefore, rather than considering these as instances of plagiarism, this essay looks at the practice of copying and borrowing as an exercise in intertextuality, intended as the faithful retransmission of ancient truths, and as an indication of the public domain of texts in Tibet.

Fiduciary Principles and Public Offices

2019 ◽  
pp. 302-322
Author(s):  
Ethan J. Leib ◽  
Stephen R. Galoob
Keyword(s):  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Public Institutions ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Public Office ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Normative Structure ◽  
The Public ◽  
Positive Law

This chapter examines how fiduciary principles apply to public offices, focusing on what it means for officeholders to comport themselves to their respective public roles appropriately. Public law institutions can operate in accordance with fiduciary norms even when they are enforced differently from the remedial mechanisms available in private fiduciary law. In the public sector, fiduciary norms are difficult to enforce directly and the fiduciary norms of public office do not overlap completely with the positive law governing public officials. Nevertheless, core fiduciary principles are at the heart of public officeholding, and public officers need to fulfill their fiduciary role obligations. This chapter first considers three areas of U.S. public law whose fiduciary character reinforces the tenet that public office is a public trust: the U.S. Constitution’s “Emoluments Clauses,” administrative law, and the law of judging. It then explores the fiduciary character of public law by looking at the deeper normative structure of public officeholding, placing emphasis on how public officeholders are constrained by the principles of loyalty, care, deliberation, conscientiousness, and robustness. It also compares the policy implications of the fiduciary view of officeholding with those of Dennis Thompson’s view before concluding with an explanation of how the application of fiduciary principles might differ between public and private law settings and how public institutions might be designed or reformed in light of fiduciary norms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document