Glass-ionomer Cements in Restorative Dentistry: A Critical Appraisal

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Almuhaiza

ABSTRACT Glass-ionomer cements (GICs) are mainstream restorative materials that are bioactive and have a wide range of uses, such as lining, bonding, sealing, luting or restoring a tooth. Although the major characteristics of GICs for the wider applications in dentistry are adhesion to tooth structure, fluoride releasing capacity and tooth-colored restorations, the sensitivity to moisture, inherent opacity, long-term wear and strength are not as adequate as desired. They have undergone remarkable changes in their composition, such as the addition of metallic ions or resin components to their composition, which contributed to improve their physical properties and diversified their use as a restorative material of great clinical applicability. The lightcured polymer reinforced materials appear to have substantial benefits, while retaining the advantages of fluoride release and adhesion. Further research should be directed towards improving the properties, such as strength and esthetics without altering its inherent qualities, such as adhesion and fluoride releasing capabilities. How to cite this article Almuhaiza M. Glass-ionomer Cements in Restorative Dentistry: A Critical Appraisal. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(4):331-336.

2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (spe) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carel Leon Davidson

This article describes the properties, advances and shortcomings of glass-ionomer cement as a restorative material. The adhesion of glass-ionomer to tooth structure is less technique sensitive than composite resins and its quality increases with time. Therefore glass-ionomer might turn out to the more reliable restorative material in minimal invasive dentistry based on adhesive techniques.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-204
Author(s):  
Dongyun Lee ◽  
Jongsoo Kim ◽  
Miran Han ◽  
Jisun Shin

The aim of the study is to compare the fluoride release and recharge properties of glass ionomer cements and ‘alkasite’.<br/>Specimens of two glass ionomer cements (Fuji Ⅸ GP and Riva Self Cure), ‘alkasite’ restorative material (Cention N) and composite resin (Filtek<sup>TM</sup> Z350XT) were prepared. The fluoride release of each specimen was measured for 28 days. Thereafter, 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel was applied to experimental groups. No treatment was performed on control groups. The fluoride release was measured for additional 7 days to evaluate the fluoride recharge properties of each materials.<br/>The fluoride release was highest in Riva Self Cure, followed by Fuji Ⅸ GP, Cention N (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Fluoride release of Cention N was measured to be approximately 49% of Fuji Ⅸ GP’s. After the application of 1.23% APF gel, increases in fluoride release were observed in Riva Self Cure, Fuji Ⅸ GP and Cention N (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Fluoride recharge was observed in Cention N as well as in glass ionomer cements. Further studies are required to evaluate the anti-cariogenic properties of Cention N at clinical conditions.


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rogério Lacerda dos Santos ◽  
Matheus Melo Pithon ◽  
Delmo Santiago Vaitsman ◽  
Mônica Tirre de Souza Araújo ◽  
Margareth Maria Gomes de Souza ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the fluoride release behavior of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements before or after fluoride recharge. The materials were divided into 5 groups: 2 resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements used for attaching orthodontic bands, that is, group FOB (Fuji Ortho Band) and group MCB (Multi-Cure Glass Ionomer Orthodontic Band Cement); 2 resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements and a composite used for bonding orthodontic brackets, that is, group OGLC (Ortho Glass LC), group FOLC (Fuji Ortho LC), and group TXT (Transbond XT), respectively. Fluoride release was measured during a 60-day period by using selective ion electrodes connected to an ionic analyser. After 4 weeks, the samples were exposed to 0.221% sodium fluoride solution. The results showed that cements achieved a maximum fluoride release 24 h after initial setting. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups FOB and OGLC regarding the amount of released fluoride following fluoride recharge from day 31 to day 36 (p>0.05). In conclusion, FOB and OGLC cements showed a higher capacity of capturing and releasing fluoride compared to the other cements studied.


2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Neelakantan ◽  
S. John ◽  
S. Anand ◽  
N. Sureshbabu ◽  
C. Subbarao

Clinical Relevance The antibacterial and cariostatic properties of glass-ionomer cements are associated with the amount of fluoride released. Therefore, fluoride release from a restorative material for extended periods of time is considered favorable.


Author(s):  
Imran Farooq ◽  
Umair Hassan ◽  
Sarosh Mahdi ◽  
Rizwan Ullah ◽  
Hajra Rana

ABSTRACT Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are mostly used in restorative dentistry. Their efficacy is enhanced as compared to other direct restorative materials because they release various ions like fluoride (F–), strontium (Sr+2) and calcium (Ca+2) when they are exposed to an acidic environment. Newer GICs often have Sr+2 in place of Ca+2 ions as part of their powder component. Both ions (F– and Sr+2) have a synergistic effect on the remineralization process. These elements are not dependent on each other. Either one has an effect on remineralization. A combination of Sr+2 and F– might provide more benefits than either of these elements individually. An attempt has been made in this article to discuss the composition, setting reaction and bonding mechanism of GIC with the tooth surface and to cover the effects of release of Sr+2 and F– ions from GIC on the tooth structure. How to cite this article Hassan U, Farooq I, Mahdi S, Ullah R, Rana H. Newer Glass Ionomer Cements having Strontium Ions and the Effect of their Release on Acidic Medium. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2012;2(2):57-60.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lígia S. Bueno ◽  
Rafael M. Silva ◽  
Ana Paula R. Magalhães ◽  
Maria Fidela L. Navarro ◽  
Renata C. Pascotto ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-207
Author(s):  
Luiz Antonio SALATA ◽  
Cássio Edvard SVERZUT ◽  
Samuel Porfírio XAVIER

The purpose of this study is to update the reader upon the latest scientific trends concerning the use of glass ionomer cements (GICs). These materials which have been found of large clinical application in dentistry worldwide, have recently been successfully tested as bone substitutes in minor surgical procedures. The new perspectives of the use of glass ionomer as an osteoconductive material is analysed in the light of its biological properties as a restorative material.


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. e197-e203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Dionysopoulos ◽  
Kosmas Tolidis ◽  
Paris Gerasimou ◽  
Thrasyvoulos Sfeikos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document