scholarly journals Distinct surface response to black carbon aerosols

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (18) ◽  
pp. 13797-13809
Author(s):  
Tao Tang ◽  
Drew Shindell ◽  
Yuqiang Zhang ◽  
Apostolos Voulgarakis ◽  
Jean-Francois Lamarque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wind Speed ◽  
Surface Energy ◽  
Greenhouse Gases ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Black Carbon ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
Radiative Heating ◽  
Energy Redistribution ◽  
Enhanced Stability ◽  
Reduced Surface

Abstract. For the radiative impact of individual climate forcings, most previous studies focused on the global mean values at the top of the atmosphere (TOA), and less attention has been paid to surface processes, especially for black carbon (BC) aerosols. In this study, the surface radiative responses to five different forcing agents were analyzed by using idealized model simulations. Our analyses reveal that for greenhouse gases, solar irradiance, and scattering aerosols, the surface temperature changes are mainly dictated by the changes of surface radiative heating, but for BC, surface energy redistribution between different components plays a more crucial role. Globally, when a unit BC forcing is imposed at TOA, the net shortwave radiation at the surface decreases by -5.87±0.67 W m−2 (W m−2)−1 (averaged over global land without Antarctica), which is partially offset by increased downward longwave radiation (2.32±0.38 W m−2 (W m−2)−1 from the warmer atmosphere, causing a net decrease in the incoming downward surface radiation of -3.56±0.60 W m−2 (W m−2)−1. Despite a reduction in the downward radiation energy, the surface air temperature still increases by 0.25±0.08 K because of less efficient energy dissipation, manifested by reduced surface sensible (-2.88±0.43 W m−2 (W m−2)−1) and latent heat flux (-1.54±0.27 W m−2 (W m−2)−1), as well as a decrease in Bowen ratio (-0.20±0.07 (W m−2)−1). Such reductions of turbulent fluxes can be largely explained by enhanced air stability (0.07±0.02 K (W m−2)−1), measured as the difference of the potential temperature between 925 hPa and surface, and reduced surface wind speed (-0.05±0.01 m s−1 (W m−2)−1). The enhanced stability is due to the faster atmospheric warming relative to the surface, whereas the reduced wind speed can be partially explained by enhanced stability and reduced Equator-to-pole atmospheric temperature gradient. These rapid adjustments under BC forcing occur in the lower atmosphere and propagate downward to influence the surface energy redistribution and thus surface temperature response, which is not observed under greenhouse gases or scattering aerosols. Our study provides new insights into the impact of absorbing aerosols on surface energy balance and surface temperature response.

scholarly journals Distinct surface response to black carbon aerosols

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Tang ◽  
Drew Shindell ◽  
Yuqiang Zhang ◽  
Apostolos Voulgarakis ◽  
Jean-Francois Lamarque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wind Speed ◽  
Surface Energy ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Black Carbon ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
Energy Redistribution ◽  
Carbon Aerosols ◽  
Enhanced Stability ◽  
Reduced Surface ◽  
Black Carbon Aerosols

Abstract. For the radiative impact of individual climate forcings, most previous studies focused on the global mean values at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) and less attention has been paid to surface processes, especially for black carbon aerosols. In this study, the surface radiative responses to five different forcing agents were analyzed by using idealized model simulations. Our analyses reveal that for greenhouse gases, solar irradiance and scattering aerosols, the surface temperature changes are mainly dictated by the changes of surface radiative heating, but for BC, surface energy redistribution between different components plays a more crucial role. Globally, when a unit BC forcing was imposed at TOA, the net shortwave radiation at the surface decreased by 5.09 ± 1.80 W m−2 (averaged over global land), which is partially offset by increased downward longwave radiation (1.67 ± 0.24 W m−2) from the warmer atmosphere, causing a net decrease in the incoming downward surface radiation of 3.42 ± 0.51 W m−2. Despite a reduction in the downward radiation energy, the surface air temperature still increased by 0.14 ± 0.05 K because of less efficient energy dissipation, manifested by reduced surface sensible (2.53 ± 0.37 W m−2) and latent heat flux (1.30 ± 0.27 W m−2), as well as a decrease of Bowen ratio (0.18 ± 0.05). Such reductions of turbulent fluxes can be largely explained by enhanced air stability (0.06 ± 0.01 K), measured as the difference of the potential temperature between 925 hPa and surface, and reduced surface wind speed (0.05 ± 0.01 m s−1). The enhanced stability is due to the faster atmospheric warming relative to the surface whereas the reduced wind speed can be partially explained by enhanced stability and reduced equator-to-pole atmospheric temperature gradient. These rapid adjustments under BC forcing exerted a “top-down” impact on the surface energy redistribution and thus, surface temperature response, which is not observed under greenhouse gas or scattering aerosols. Our study provides new insights into the impact of absorbing aerosols on surface energy balance and surface temperature response.

scholarly journals Rapid Adjustments Cause Weak Surface Temperature Response to Increased Black Carbon Concentrations

2017 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 11,462-11,481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Weum Stjern ◽  
Bjørn Hallvard Samset ◽  
Gunnar Myhre ◽  
Piers M. Forster ◽  
Øivind Hodnebrog ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Black Carbon ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
Weak Surface ◽  
Carbon Concentrations

scholarly journals Comment on "Tropospheric temperature response to stratospheric ozone recovery in the 21st century" by Hu et al. (2011)

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 2853-2861 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Previdi ◽  
L. M. Polvani
Keyword(s):  
Greenhouse Gases ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
First Century ◽  
Tropospheric Temperature ◽  
Surface Temperature Change ◽  
Twenty First Century

Abstract. Stratospheric ozone recovery is expected to figure prominently in twenty-first century climate change. In a recent paper, Hu et al. (2011) argue that one impact of ozone recovery will be to enhance the warming of the surface-troposphere system produced by increases in well-mixed greenhouse gases; furthermore, this enhanced warming would be strongest in the Northern Hemisphere, which is surprising since previous studies have consistently shown the effects of stratospheric ozone changes to be most pronounced in the Southern Hemisphere. Hu et al. (2011) base their claims largely on differences in the simulated temperature change between two groups of IPCC climate models, one group which included stratospheric ozone recovery in its twenty-first century simulations and a second group which did not. Both groups of models were forced with the same increases in well-mixed greenhouse gases according to the A1B emissions scenario. In the current work, we compare the surface temperature responses of the same two groups of models in a different experiment in which atmospheric CO2 was increased by 1% per year until doubling. We find remarkably similar differences in the simulated surface temperature change between the two sets of models as Hu et al. (2011) found for the A1B experiment, suggesting that the enhanced warming which they attribute to stratospheric ozone recovery is actually a reflection of different responses of the two model groups to greenhouse gas forcing.

scholarly journals Understanding the surface temperature response and its uncertainty to CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, black carbon, and sulfate

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (19) ◽  
pp. 14941-14958
Author(s):  
Kalle Nordling ◽  
Hannele Korhonen ◽  
Jouni Räisänen ◽  
Antti-Ilari Partanen ◽  
Bjørn H. Samset ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Black Carbon ◽  
Surface Albedo ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
Regional Model ◽  
Climate Forcing ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
Temperature Responses ◽  
Global Surface

Abstract. Understanding the regional surface temperature responses to different anthropogenic climate forcing agents, such as greenhouse gases and aerosols, is crucial for understanding past and future regional climate changes. In modern climate models, the regional temperature responses vary greatly for all major forcing agents, but the causes of this variability are poorly understood. Here, we analyze how changes in atmospheric and oceanic energy fluxes due to perturbations in different anthropogenic climate forcing agents lead to changes in global and regional surface temperatures. We use climate model data on idealized perturbations in four major anthropogenic climate forcing agents (CO2, CH4, sulfate, and black carbon aerosols) from Precipitation Driver Response Model Intercomparison Project (PDRMIP) climate experiments for six climate models (CanESM2, HadGEM2-ES, NCAR-CESM1-CAM4, NorESM1, MIROC-SPRINTARS, GISS-E2). Particularly, we decompose the regional energy budget contributions to the surface temperature responses due to changes in longwave and shortwave fluxes under clear-sky and cloudy conditions, surface albedo changes, and oceanic and atmospheric energy transport. We also analyze the regional model-to-model temperature response spread due to each of these components. The global surface temperature response stems from changes in longwave emissivity for greenhouse gases (CO2 and CH4) and mainly from changes in shortwave clear-sky fluxes for aerosols (sulfate and black carbon). The global surface temperature response normalized by effective radiative forcing is nearly the same for all forcing agents (0.63, 0.54, 0.57, 0.61 K W−1 m2). While the main physical processes driving global temperature responses vary between forcing agents, for all forcing agents the model-to-model spread in temperature responses is dominated by differences in modeled changes in longwave clear-sky emissivity. Furthermore, in polar regions for all forcing agents the differences in surface albedo change is a key contributor to temperature responses and its spread. For black carbon, the modeled differences in temperature response due to shortwave clear-sky radiation are also important in the Arctic. Regional model-to-model differences due to changes in shortwave and longwave cloud radiative effect strongly modulate each other. For aerosols, clouds play a major role in the model spread of regional surface temperature responses. In regions with strong aerosol forcing, the model-to-model differences arise from shortwave clear-sky responses and are strongly modulated by combined temperature responses to oceanic and atmospheric heat transport in the models.

scholarly journals Separating the Impact of Individual Land Surface Properties on the Terrestrial Surface Energy Budget in both the Coupled and Uncoupled Land–Atmosphere System

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (18) ◽  
pp. 5725-5744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marysa M. Laguë ◽  
Gordon B. Bonan ◽  
Abigail L. S. Swann
Keyword(s):  
Surface Energy ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Surface Properties ◽  
Energy Budget ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
Surface Energy Budget ◽  
Evaporative Resistance ◽  
Atmospheric Feedbacks ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Changes in the land surface can drive large responses in the atmosphere on local, regional, and global scales. Surface properties control the partitioning of energy within the surface energy budget to fluxes of shortwave and longwave radiation, sensible and latent heat, and ground heat storage. Changes in surface energy fluxes can impact the atmosphere across scales through changes in temperature, cloud cover, and large-scale atmospheric circulation. We test the sensitivity of the atmosphere to global changes in three land surface properties: albedo, evaporative resistance, and surface roughness. We show the impact of changing these surface properties differs drastically between simulations run with an offline land model, compared to coupled land–atmosphere simulations that allow for atmospheric feedbacks associated with land–atmosphere coupling. Atmospheric feedbacks play a critical role in defining the temperature response to changes in albedo and evaporative resistance, particularly in the extratropics. More than 50% of the surface temperature response to changing albedo comes from atmospheric feedbacks in over 80% of land areas. In some regions, cloud feedbacks in response to increased evaporative resistance result in nearly 1 K of additional surface warming. In contrast, the magnitude of surface temperature responses to changes in vegetation height are comparable between offline and coupled simulations. We improve our fundamental understanding of how and why changes in vegetation cover drive responses in the atmosphere, and develop understanding of the role of individual land surface properties in controlling climate across spatial scales—critical to understanding the effects of land-use change on Earth’s climate.

scholarly journals Comment on "Tropospheric temperature response to stratospheric ozone recovery in the 21st century" by Hu et al. (2011)

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 4893-4896 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Previdi ◽  
L. M. Polvani
Keyword(s):  
Greenhouse Gases ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
First Century ◽  
Tropospheric Temperature ◽  
Surface Temperature Change ◽  
Twenty First Century

Abstract. Stratospheric ozone recovery is expected to figure prominently in twenty-first century climate change. In a recent paper, Hu et al. (2011) argue that one impact of ozone recovery will be to enhance the warming of the surface-troposphere system produced by increases in well-mixed greenhouse gases. Furthermore, this enhanced warming would be strongest in the Northern Hemisphere, which is surprising since previous studies have consistently shown the effects of stratospheric ozone changes to be most pronounced in the Southern Hemisphere. Hu et al. (2011) base their claims largely on differences in the simulated temperature change between two groups of CMIP3 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 3) climate models, one group which included stratospheric ozone recovery in its twenty-first century simulations and a second group which did not. Both groups of models were forced with the same increases in well-mixed greenhouse gases according to the A1B emissions scenario. In the current work, we compare the surface temperature responses of the same two groups of models in a different experiment in which atmospheric CO2 was increased by 1% per year until doubling. We find remarkably similar differences in the simulated surface temperature change between the two sets of models as Hu et al. (2011) found for the A1B experiment, suggesting that the enhanced warming which they attribute to stratospheric ozone recovery is actually a reflection of different responses of the two model groups to greenhouse gas forcing.

scholarly journals Understanding the surface temperature response and its uncertainty to CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, black carbon and sulfate

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalle Nordling ◽  
Hannele Korhonen ◽  
Jouni Räisänen ◽  
Antti-Ilari Partanen ◽  
Bjørn Samset ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Black Carbon ◽  
Surface Albedo ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
Regional Model ◽  
Climate Forcing ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
Temperature Responses ◽  
Global Surface

Abstract. Understanding the regional surface temperature responses to different anthropogenic climate forcing agents, such as greenhouse gases and aerosols, is crucial for understanding past and future regional climate changes. In modern climate models, the regional temperature responses vary greatly for all major forcing agents, but the causes of this variability are poorly understood. Here, we analyse how changes in atmospheric and oceanic energy fluxes due to perturbations in different anthropogenic climate forcing agents lead to changes in global and regional surface temperatures. We use climate model data on idealized perturbations in four major anthropogenic climate forcing agents (CO2, CH4, and sulfate and black carbon aerosols) from PDRMIP climate experiments for six climate models (CanESM2, HadGEM2-ES, NCAR-CESM1-CAM4, NorESM1, MIROC-SPRINTARS, GISS-E2). Particularly, we decompose the regional energy budget contributions to the surface temperature responses due to changes in longwave and shortwave fluxes under clear-sky and cloudy conditions, surface albedo changes, and oceanic and atmospheric energy transport. We also analyse the regional model-to-model temperature response spread due to each of these components. The global surface temperature response stems from changes in longwave emissivity for greenhouse gases (CO2 and CH4) and mainly from changes in shortwave clear-sky fluxes for aerosols (sulfate and black carbon). The global surface temperature response normalized by effective radiative forcing is nearly the same for all forcing agents (0.63, 0.54, 0.57, 0.61 KW−1 m2). While the main physical processes driving global temperature responses vary between forcing agents, for all forcing agents the model-to-model spread in temperature responses is dominated by differences in modelled changes in longwave clear-sky emissivity. Furthermore, in polar regions for all forcing agents the differences in surface albedo change is a key contributor to temperature responses and its spread. For black carbon the modelled differences in temperature response due to shortwave clear-sky radiation are also important in the Arctic. Regional model-to-model differences due to changes in shortwave and longwave cloud radiative effect strongly modulate each other. For aerosols clouds play a major role in the model spread of regional surface temperature responses. In regions with strong aerosol forcing the model-to-model differences arise from shortwave clear-sky responses and are strongly modulated by combined temperature responses to oceanic and atmospheric heat transport in the models.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document