scholarly journals In-stream <i>Escherichia coli</i> modeling using high-temporal-resolution data with deep learning and process-based models

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 6185-6202
Author(s):  
Ather Abbas ◽  
Sangsoo Baek ◽  
Norbert Silvera ◽  
Bounsamay Soulileuth ◽  
Yakov Pachepsky ◽  
...  

Abstract. Contamination of surface waters with microbiological pollutants is a major concern to public health. Although long-term and high-frequency Escherichia coli (E. coli) monitoring can help prevent diseases from fecal pathogenic microorganisms, such monitoring is time-consuming and expensive. Process-driven models are an alternative means for estimating concentrations of fecal pathogens. However, process-based modeling still has limitations in improving the model accuracy because of the complexity of relationships among hydrological and environmental variables. With the rise of data availability and computation power, the use of data-driven models is increasing. In this study, we simulated fate and transport of E. coli in a 0.6 km2 tropical headwater catchment located in the Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) using a deep-learning model and a process-based model. The deep learning model was built using the long short-term memory (LSTM) methodology, whereas the process-based model was constructed using the Hydrological Simulation Program–FORTRAN (HSPF). First, we calibrated both models for surface as well as for subsurface flow. Then, we simulated the E. coli transport with 6 min time steps with both the HSPF and LSTM models. The LSTM provided accurate results for surface and subsurface flow with 0.51 and 0.64 of the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values, respectively. In contrast, the NSE values yielded by the HSPF were −0.7 and 0.59 for surface and subsurface flow. The simulated E. coli concentrations from LSTM provided the NSE of 0.35, whereas the HSPF gave an unacceptable performance with an NSE value of −3.01 due to the limitations of HSPF in capturing the dynamics of E. coli with land-use change. The simulated E. coli concentration showed the rise and drop patterns corresponding to annual changes in land use. This study showcases the application of deep-learning-based models as an efficient alternative to process-based models for E. coli fate and transport simulation at the catchment scale.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ather Abbas ◽  
Sangsoo Baek ◽  
Norbert Silvera ◽  
Bounsamay Soulileuth ◽  
Yakov Pachepsky ◽  
...  

Abstract. Contamination of surface waters through microbiological pollutants is a major concern to public health. Although long-term and high-frequency E. coli monitoring can help prevent diseases from fecal pathogenic microorganisms, this monitoring is time consuming and expensive. Process-driven models are an alternative method for determining fecal pathogenic microorganisms. However, process-based modeling still has limitations in improving the model accuracy because of the complex mechanistic relationships among hydrological and environmental variables. On the other hand, with the rise in data availability and computation power, the use of data-driven models is increasing. Therefore, in this study, we simulated the transport of Escherichia coli (E. coli) in a 0.6 km² tropical headwater catchment located in Lao PDR using a deep learning model and a process-based model. The deep learning model was built using the long short-term memory (LSTM) technique, whereas the process-based model was constructed using the Hydrological Simulation Program–FORTRAN (HSPF). First, we calibrated both models for surface as well as for subsurface flow. Then, we simulated the E. coli transport with 6 min time steps with both the HSPF and LSTM models. The LSTM provided accurate results for surface and subsurface flow, by showing 0.51 and 0.64 of Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), respectively, whereas the NSE values yielded by the HSPF were −0.7 and 0.59 for surface and subsurface flow. The simulated E. coli concentration from LSTM also improved, yielding an NSE of 0.35, whereas the HSPF showed an unacceptable performance, with an NSE value of −3.01. This is because of the limitation of HSPF in capturing the dynamics of E. coli with land-use change. The simulated E. coli concentration showed rise and drop patterns corresponding to annual changes in land use. This study shows the application of deep learning-based models as an efficient alternative to process-based models for E. coil fate and transport simulation at the catchment scale.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 627-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avinash Chandra Pandey ◽  
Dharmveer Singh Rajpoot

Background: Sentiment analysis is a contextual mining of text which determines viewpoint of users with respect to some sentimental topics commonly present at social networking websites. Twitter is one of the social sites where people express their opinion about any topic in the form of tweets. These tweets can be examined using various sentiment classification methods to find the opinion of users. Traditional sentiment analysis methods use manually extracted features for opinion classification. The manual feature extraction process is a complicated task since it requires predefined sentiment lexicons. On the other hand, deep learning methods automatically extract relevant features from data hence; they provide better performance and richer representation competency than the traditional methods. Objective: The main aim of this paper is to enhance the sentiment classification accuracy and to reduce the computational cost. Method: To achieve the objective, a hybrid deep learning model, based on convolution neural network and bi-directional long-short term memory neural network has been introduced. Results: The proposed sentiment classification method achieves the highest accuracy for the most of the datasets. Further, from the statistical analysis efficacy of the proposed method has been validated. Conclusion: Sentiment classification accuracy can be improved by creating veracious hybrid models. Moreover, performance can also be enhanced by tuning the hyper parameters of deep leaning models.


2021 ◽  
Vol 296 ◽  
pp. 126564
Author(s):  
Md Alamgir Hossain ◽  
Ripon K. Chakrabortty ◽  
Sondoss Elsawah ◽  
Michael J. Ryan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document