scholarly journals A GCD and LCM-like inequality for multiplicative lattices

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-270
Author(s):  
Dan D. Anderson ◽  
Takashi Aoki ◽  
Shuzo Izumi ◽  
Yasuo Ohno ◽  
Manabu Ozaki

Let $A_1,\ldots,A_n$ $(n\ge 2)$ be elements of an commutative multiplicative lattice. Let $G(k)$ (resp., $L(k)$) denote the product of all the joins (resp., meets) of $k$ of the elements. Then we show that $$L(n)G(2)G(4)\cdots G(2\lfloor n/2 \rfloor ) \leq G(1)G(3)\cdots G(2\lceil n/2 \rceil -1).$$ In particular this holds for the lattice of ideals of a commutative ring. We also consider the relationship between $$G(n)L(2)L(4)\cdots L(2\lfloor n/2 \rfloor ) \text{ and } L(1)L(3)\cdots L(2\lceil n/2 \rceil -1)$$and show that any inequality relationships are possible.

Author(s):  
Mahmood S. Fiadh ◽  
Wafaa H. Hanoon

Let be a -module, T is a commutative ring with identity and be a proper submodule of . In this paper we introduce the concepts of 2-visible submodules and fully 2-visible modules as a generalizations of visible submodules and fully visible modules resp., where is said to be 2-visible whenever for every nonzero ideal of and A -module is called fully 2-visible if for any proper submodule of it is 2-visible.Study some of the properties of these concepts also discuss the relationship 2-visible submodules and fully 2-visible modules with 2-pure submoules and other related submodules and modules resp. are given.


Author(s):  
Abraham S.-T. Lue

This paper examines the relationship between extensions in a variety and general extensions in the category of associative algebras. Our associative algebras are all unitary, over some fixed commutative ring Λ with identity, but while our discussion will be restricted to this category, it is clear that obvious analogues exist for groups, Lie algebras and Jordan algebras. (We use the notion of a bimultiplication of an associative algebra. In (2), Knopfmacher gives the definition of a bimultiplication in any variety of linear algebras.)


1972 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert S. Gaskill

In this note we examine the relationship of a distributive lattice to its lattice of ideals. Our main result is that a distributive lattice and its lattice of ideals share exactly the same collection of finite sublattices. In addition we give a related result characterizing those finite distributive lattices L which can be embedded in a lattice L′ whenever they can be embedded in its lattice of ideals T(L′).


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 552-555
Author(s):  
Hatam Yahya Khalaf ◽  
Buthyna Nijad Shihab

During that article T stands for a commutative ring with identity and that S stands for a unitary module over T. The intersection property of annihilatoers of a module X on a ring T and a maximal submodule W of M has been reviewed under this article where he provide several examples that explain that the property. Add to this a number of equivalent statements about the intersection property have been demonstrated as well as the direct sum of module that realize that the characteristic has studied here we proved that the modules that achieve the intersection property are closed under the direct sum with a specific condition. In addition to all this, the relationship between the modules that achieve the above characteristics with other types of modules has been given.


Algebra ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. S. Manjarekar ◽  
A. V. Bingi

We investigate ϕ-prime and ϕ-primary elements in a compactly generated multiplicative lattice L. By a counterexample, it is shown that a ϕ-primary element in L need not be primary. Some characterizations of ϕ-primary and ϕ-prime elements in L are obtained. Finally, some results for almost prime and almost primary elements in L with characterizations are obtained.


2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-136
Author(s):  
P. Malakooti Rad ◽  
S. Yassemi ◽  
Sh. Ghalandarzadeh ◽  
P. Safari

AbstractLet R be a commutative ring with identity. Let M be an R-module and T (M)* be the set of nonzero torsion elements. The set T(M)* makes up the vertices of the corresponding torsion graph, ΓR(M), with two distinct vertices x, y ∈ T(M)* forming an edge if Ann(x) ∩ Ann(y) ≠ 0. In this paper we study the case where the graph ΓR(M) is connected with diam(ΓR(M)) ≤ 3 and we investigate the relationship between the diameters of ΓR(M) and ΓR(R). Also we study girth of ΓR(M), it is shown that if ΓR(M) contains a cycle, then gr(ΓR(M)) = 3.


2016 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 1650071
Author(s):  
Vinayak Joshi ◽  
Sachin Sarode

In this paper, we study the multiplicative zero-divisor graph [Formula: see text] of a multiplicative lattice [Formula: see text]. Under certain conditions, we prove that for a reduced multiplicative lattice [Formula: see text] having more than two minimal prime elements, [Formula: see text] contains a cycle and [Formula: see text]. This essentially settles the conjecture of Behboodi and Rakeei [The annihilating-ideal graph of commutative rings II, J. Algebra Appl. 10(4) (2011) 741–753]. Further, we have characterized the diameter of [Formula: see text].


1983 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Bergen

AbstractLet R be a prime ring and d≠0 a derivation of R. We examine the relationship between the structure of R and that of d(R). We prove that if R is an algebra over a commutative ring A such that d(R) is a finitely generated submodule then R is an order in a simple algebra finite dimensional over its center.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (07) ◽  
pp. 1950137
Author(s):  
Lixin Mao

Given an [Formula: see text]-module [Formula: see text] and a class of [Formula: see text]-modules [Formula: see text] over a commutative ring [Formula: see text], we investigate the relationship between the existence of [Formula: see text]-envelopes (respectively, [Formula: see text]-covers) and the existence of [Formula: see text]-envelopes or [Formula: see text]-envelopes (respectively, [Formula: see text]-covers or [Formula: see text]-covers) of modules. As a consequence, we characterize coherent rings, Noetherian rings, perfect rings and Artinian rings in terms of envelopes and covers by [Formula: see text]-projective, [Formula: see text]-flat, [Formula: see text]-injective and [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text]-injective modules, where [Formula: see text] is a semidualizing [Formula: see text]-module.


2010 ◽  
Vol 52 (A) ◽  
pp. 151-162
Author(s):  
ROBERT WISBAUER

AbstractAlgebras A and coalgebras C over a commutative ring R are defined by properties of the (endo)functors A ⊗R – and C ⊗R – on the category of R-modules R. Generalising these notions, monads and comonads were introduced on arbitrary categories, and it turned out that some of their basic relations do not depend on the specific properties of the tensor product. In particular, the adjoint of any comonad is a monad (and vice versa), and hence, for any coalgebra C, HomR(C, –), the right adjoint of C ⊗R –, is a monad on R. The modules for the monad HomR(C, –) were called contramodules by Eilenberg–Moore and the purpose of this talk is to outline the related constructions and explain the relationship between C-comodules and C-contramodules. The results presented grew out from cooperation with G. Böhm, T. Brzeziński and B. Mesablishvili.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document