scholarly journals “Not just herniated disc” back pain: Outcome of oxygen-ozone treatment in selected applications.

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Matteo Bonetti ◽  
Alessio Zambello ◽  
Marco Leonardi ◽  
Ciro Princiotta

Low back pain and sciatica are highly debilitating conditions affecting all socioeconomic groups at an increasingly early age. They are caused by different often concomitant spinal disorders: disc or facet joint disease, spondylolisthesis (with or without listhesis), vertebral body and interapophyseal arthrosis, spinal stenosis, radicular and synovial cysts and, more rarely, infections and primary or metastatic cancer.Treatment of low back pain and/or sciatica requires an accurate diagnosis based on thorough history-taking and physical examination followed by appropriate imaging tests, namely computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance scans in addition to standard X-rays of the spine.In recent years, several reports have demonstrated the utility of oxygen-ozone therapy in reducing the size of herniated discs. The present study reports on the outcome of oxygen-ozone treatment in 416 patients with non-discogenic low back pain caused by degenerative disease of the posterior vertebral compartment (facet synovitis, Baastrup syndrome, spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis, facet degeneration). 

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Baeza Noci

The paravertebral injections were first referred in 1989 by Dr. Cesare Verga [1], an italian orthopedist. He used them to treat disc herniation. We call them “classical paravertebral injections”. Later on, one colleague of him, Dr. Scuccimarra [2], used longer needles to inject ozone close to the foramen, under the hypothesis of improving the results, and he succeeded. They are known as “deep paravertebral injections”. Other techniques have been developed in order to improve the results, reduce the risks and shorten the treatment.[3-9] The classical paravertebral approach is done locating the upper part of the spinous process of the superior vertebrae involved in the disco-radicular conflict and injecting 2,5 cm to the left and right of the spinous process with a 0,8 x 40 mm needle an amount of 5-10 mL per point depending on the size of the patient. Some authors(63) have proved that using lower ozone concentration (10 µg/mL) can be as useful as standard concentration (20 µg/mL). Our advice is to use a 0,4 x 40 mm needle or thinner if available. Local, topic anesthesia or cryotherapy can be used to reduce the pain of the needle. Injection should be done slowly. Using local anesthesia in the muscle can reduce the effect of ozone injection. The “deep paravertebral injection” uses a similar procedure, but the distance from the middle line is narrower (1,5 cm for cervical and dorsal injection and 2 cm for lumbar injection) and it is necessary using longer needles (0,4 or 0,5 x 90 mm spinal needle) to be able to locate the posterior joints with the tip of the needle an inject periarticularly. The amount of ozone used is the same. It is also possible to inject over the laminae, close to the foramen, instead of around the facet joints, but risk of accidental dura or radicular puncture is greater (although without permanent side effects); this can be done for nerve root de-inflammation. Dr Verga modified his technique for cervical and dorsal disc herniation, narrowing the distance from the spinous process to 1,5 cm left and right, using shorter needles (25 or 30 mm) and decreasing the ozone volume per point to 3-7 mL. Dorsal approach uses the same technique as for cervical paravertebral injections. The classical paravertebral injection produce a relaxation in the muscle spam of the lumbar spine in low back pain. The deep paravertebral injection produce an anti-inflammatory effect that can reduce inflammation on the facet joint or nerve root, depending on the point of injection. Based on this empirical approach, and the publications that have already used them , the indications of these injections are: -Disc herniation [1-2] -Spondylolysis [10] -Spondylosis [11-14] -Lumbar spinal stenosis [7, 15] -Symptomatic treatment of facet joint disease [7] -Mechanical low back pain These injections may have side effects due to the technique itself, not the ozone, but we have few reports on anecdotal cases, most of them without aftermath.


2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. S74
Author(s):  
Weishi Li ◽  
Shaobai Wang ◽  
Michal Kozanek ◽  
Kirkham Wood ◽  
Guoan Li

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. e146-e153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E Leggett ◽  
Lesley JJ Soril ◽  
Diane L Lorenzetti ◽  
Tom Noseworthy ◽  
Rodney Steadman ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a procedure using heat to interrupt pain signals in spinal nerves, is an emerging treatment option for chronic low back pain. Its clinical efficacy has not yet been established.OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of RFA for chronic low back pain associated with lumbar facet joints, sacroiliac joints, discogenic low back pain and the coccyx.METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched up to August 2013. Abstracts and full-text articles were reviewed in duplicate. Included articles were sham-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs), assessed the efficacy of RFA, reported at least one month of follow-up and included participants who had experienced back pain for at least three months. Data were extracted in duplicate and quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Due to heterogeneity, as well as a lack of reported mean differences and SDs, meta-analysis was not possible using these data.RESULTS: The present systematic review retrieved 1063 abstracts. Eleven sham-controlled RCTs were included: three studies involving discogenic back pain; six studies involving lumbar facet joint pain; and two studies involving sacroiliac joint pain. No studies were identified assessing the coccyx. The evidence supports RFA as an efficacious treatment for lumbar facet joint and sacroiliac joint pain, with five of six and both of the RCTs demonstrating statistically significant pain reductions, respectively. The evidence supporting RFA for the treatment of discogenic pain is mixed.CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of the studies focusing on lumbar facet joints and sacroiliac joints suggest that RFA significantly reduces pain in short-term follow-up, the evidence base for discogenic low back pain is mixed. There is no RCT evidence for RFA for the coccyx. Future studies should examine the clinical significance of the achieved pain reduction and the long-term efficacy of RFA.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey C. Wang ◽  
Andrew T. Dailey ◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni ◽  
Zoher Ghogawala ◽  
Daniel K. Resnick ◽  
...  

Patients suffering from a lumbar herniated disc will typically present with signs and symptoms consistent with radiculopathy. They may also have low-back pain, however, and the source of this pain is less certain, as it may be from the degenerative process that led to the herniation. The surgical alternative of choice remains a lumbar discectomy, but fusions have been performed for both primary and recurrent disc herniations. In the original guidelines, the inclusion of a fusion for routine discectomies was not recommended. This recommendation continues to be supported by more recent evidence. Based on low-level evidence, the incorporation of a lumbar fusion may be considered an option when a herniation is associated with evidence of spinal instability, chronic low-back pain, and/or severe degenerative changes, or if the patient participates in heavy manual labor. For recurrent disc herniations, there is low-level evidence to support the inclusion of lumbar fusion for patients with evidence of instability or chronic low-back pain.


Spine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Wu ◽  
Hai-xin Song ◽  
Yan Dong ◽  
Jian-hua Li

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikram B Patel

Lumbar or lower back pain is a very debilitating condition that affects  almost one fifth of the adult population during a given year. Almost everyone walking on two feet is bound to suffer from some back pain during their lifetime. The health care burden for treating low back pain is enormous, especially if the lost work hours are combined with the amount used in diagnosing and treating low back pain. Lumbar facet (zygapophysial) joints are one of the major components involved in causing lower back pain. Diagnosing the pain generator is more of an art than a science. Combining various parameters in the patient’s history, physical examination, and diagnostic studies is not much different from solving a murder mystery. Although facet joint pain may be accompanied by other pain generators, that is, lumbar intervertebral disks, nerve roots, and vertebral bodies, once treated, the relief in pain is more helpful in performing proper rehabilitation and improving further deterioration in low back pain. Muscles are almost always painful due to myofascial pain syndrome that accompanies the facet joint–related pain. Treating one without addressing the other leads to failure in management and optimization of patient’s pain and function. Several treatments are available for treatment of facet joint–mediated pain, including steroid injections using a miniscule amount and radiofrequency ablation of the nerves supplying the facet joints (medial branches of the dorsal primary ramus of the lumbar nerve root). With proper diagnosis and treatment, a patient’s pain and function can be optimized to a level where it may not impact the day-to-day activities or even resumption of the patient’s routine job function. The following review describes the anatomy, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of lumbar facet joint–mediated pain.   Key words: facet joint pain, facet joint syndrome, low back pain, medial branch radiofrequency, spondylolisthesis


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document