scholarly journals Two-dimensional reconstructions of gas temperature and concentration in combustion based on tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy

2012 ◽  
Vol 61 (24) ◽  
pp. 240702
Author(s):  
Song Jun-Ling ◽  
Hong Yan-Ji ◽  
Wang Guang-Yu ◽  
Pan Hu
Keyword(s):  
Diode Laser ◽  
Absorption Spectroscopy ◽  
Tunable Diode Laser ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Gas Temperature ◽  
Laser Absorption Spectroscopy ◽  
Laser Absorption ◽  
Diode Laser Absorption

A Measurement Based on Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy for Pressure in Gas Flow

2014 ◽  
Vol 1051 ◽  
pp. 910-914
Author(s):  
Song Ji Peng ◽  
Yan Ji Hong ◽  
Guang Yu Wang ◽  
Hu Pan
Keyword(s):  
Diode Laser ◽  
Absorption Spectroscopy ◽  
Gas Flow ◽  
Gas Pressure ◽  
Tunable Diode Laser ◽  
Measuring System ◽  
Gas Temperature ◽  
Laser Absorption Spectroscopy ◽  
Laser Absorption ◽  
Diode Laser Absorption

Pressure is a very important parameter for combustion diagnostics since pressure is a good indicator of combustion efficiency .As combustion technologies mature, more accurate and less response time pressure diagnosis are needed. Line of sight (LOS) tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) provides a fast, nonintrusive, sensitive and reliable solution for quantitative sensing of multiple flow field parameters including gas temperature, components concentration, and mass flux. So far, there is no mature method to measure gas pressure using TDLAS, and it is very important to perfect TDLAS measuring system with the gain of pressure.This paper intends to found a method based on TDLAS for gas pressure measurement. At first, a gas pressure measuring method is presented. Then, an experiment is conducted in a heated static cell to verify this method. A Direct-Absorption-Based Senor which scans H2O transitions near 1.4 μm was used, and this made the measuring system compact, low cost, simple to operate and quick to response. The experiment successfully measured the pressure in several pressure points, and the results agreed well with the data measured by pressure sensor, average difference is 3.1%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document