orbital fracture
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

281
(FIVE YEARS 89)

H-INDEX

19
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2022 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Consorti ◽  
Enrico Betti ◽  
Lisa Catarzi
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 287
Author(s):  
Chih-Kang Hsu ◽  
Meng-Wei Hsieh ◽  
Hsu-Chieh Chang ◽  
Yi-Hao Chen ◽  
Ke-Hung Chien

Surgery for strabismus secondary to orbital fracture reconstruction surgery has had low success rates and high reoperation rates due to its incomitant nature and complex underlying mechanisms. There has been no consensus as to which of the various methods for improving the surgical results are best. We proposed a modified target angle criteria that combined the regular target angle and a favorable Hess area ratio percentage (HAR%) threshold to evaluate surgical results within the first postoperative week and conducted a retrospective chart review. According to the criteria of the modified target angle at the first postoperative week, a total of 63 patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, patients who fulfilled the criteria (49 patients); and Group 2, those who did not (14 patients). Sex, type of fracture, and the use of porous polyethylene sheets and titanium mesh during reconstruction surgery were significantly different between the groups. Group 1 showed a significantly higher percentage of patients who met the criteria of HAR% > 65% at the first week and >85% (i.e., a successful outcome) at the 6-month visit (p < 0.01). Additionally, Group 1 had a higher HAR% at the first postoperative week (p < 0.01). In conclusion, the patients meeting the criteria of the modified target angle at the first postoperative week had a favorable outcome at the 6-month visit in both ocular alignment and ocular movement.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Nuo Liu ◽  
Yu-Xuan Gao ◽  
Hui-Ye Shu ◽  
Qiu-Yu Li ◽  
Qian-Min Ge ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: We aimed to identify potential functional network brain-activity abnormalities in patients with orbital fractures (OFs) by using the voxel-wise degree centrality (DC) method.Methods:We selected 20 patients with OFs (12 men and 8 women) and 20 healthy controls (HCs; 12 men and 8 women) matched by gender, age, and education level for this study. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been widely used in various disciplines. We calculated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to differentiate characteristics between patients with orbital fractures and HCs; in addition, we applied correlation analyses between behavioral performance and average DC values in different areas. The DC method served to evaluate spontaneous brain activity.Results:The DC values of patients with OFs were higher in the right cerebellum 9 area (Cerebelum_9_R) and left cerebellar peduncle 2 area (Cerebelum_Crus2_L) than those in HCs. The area under the curve (AUC) values for Cerebelum_9_R and Cerebelum_Crus2_L were 0.983 and 1, respectively. The accuracy of our ROC curve analysis result was reliable. Conclusion:Many brain regions seem to show abnormal brain network characteristics in patients with orbital fractures, suggesting potential neuropathic mechanisms.


Author(s):  
Serge Zogheib ◽  
Georges Sukkarieh ◽  
Georges Mjaess ◽  
Samer Abou Zeid

AbstractOrbital compartment syndrome (OCS) is an emergency that complicates intra-orbital, retrobulbar hemorrhage in most cases. Bony orbital decompression is an effective treatment for OCS, and displaced orbital fractures are protective. Nevertheless, in rare cases, OCS occurs despite a displaced orbital fracture. The aim of the current review is to present its pathophysiology and management based on what is published in the medical literature, and our center's experience. A systematic review of literature was conducted through PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane from inception through February 2021. The following search query was used: “orbital fracture” and “trauma” and “orbital compartment syndrome.” Studies tackling the pathophysiology and management of concurrent displaced orbital fracture with OCS were included and a cohort of patients was constituted. A cohort of 18 cases reported in the literature were included (49.3 ± 30.6 years, 50% M). Given that OCS occurs with or without orbital fracture, pathophysiology of OCS is mostly explained by the division of the orbital fat into many compartments, due to the presence of Koorneef's fibrous septa. Management of OCS in such circumstances consisted of inferior-lateral canthotomy and cantholysis in 50% of cases, subperiosteal drainage with myringotomy in 22.2% of cases, subperiosteal drainage in 16.7% of cases, and complete lateral cantholysis in 16.7% of cases. Two cases who presented to our tertiary care center were also added to this review. Physicians should be aware that OCS can occur even with displaced fractures of the orbital cavity. When clinical suspicion is present, an emergent management is needed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (04) ◽  
pp. 269-273
Author(s):  
Peiran Zhou ◽  
Christopher B. Chambers

AbstractOrbital fractures are common in facial trauma and can be a challenge to treat. Understanding anatomy of the orbit, the clinical evaluation, indications for surgery, surgical approaches, complications, and postoperative are essential in providing appropriate treatment for patients who have sustained orbital fractures. In this article, the authors review the diagnostic evaluation, acute management, treatment options, and common complications of orbital fractures, as well as recent advancements in orbital fracture repairs.


Author(s):  
Sarah R. Akkina ◽  
Tate G. Saurey ◽  
Nicholas A. Middleton ◽  
Nicole R. Mattson ◽  
Shaye Brummet ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (17) ◽  
pp. 7971
Author(s):  
Jun-Hyeok Kim ◽  
Chae-Rim Lee ◽  
Deuk-Young Oh ◽  
Young-Joon Jun ◽  
Suk-Ho Moon

The purpose of reconstruction of an orbital fracture is restoration of normal structure and volume without visible or functional complications. In a previous study, orbital implants were created using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology to restore orbital fractures. In the present study, the authors compared the efficacy of the conventional manual-bending implant and the 3D-printed standardized implant in order to verify the clinical utility of the fabricated 3D printed orbital implant. In this single-center, retrospective study, the authors evaluated medical records and 3D-CT scans of patients with inferomedial orbital fracture. Selected patients were divided into two groups. Group A underwent surgery with the 3D-printed standardized implant, while group B was treated using a manual technique to mold and trim the implant. A total of 32 patients was included in this study, 16 in each group. The volume of the preoperative lesion side was significantly different from that of the normal side or postoperative lesion side within each group. The volume of the postoperative lesion side was not statistically different from that of the normal side in Group A, but this volume was significantly different from that of the normal side in Group B. The 3D-printed standardized implant provides surgical efficacy to restore inferomedial orbital fracture and has superior surgical outcomes to the manual-bending implant.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Ying Chu ◽  
Jia-Ruei Yang ◽  
Han Tsung Liao ◽  
Bo-Ru Lai

Abstract This study analyzed the outcomes of zygomatico-orbital fracture reconstruction using the real-time navigation system with intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) C-arm computed tomography (CT). Fifteen patients with zygomatico-orbital or isolated orbital/zygoma fractures were enrolled in this prospective cohort. For zygoma reduction, the displacement at five key sutures and the differences between preoperative and intraoperative CT images were compared. For orbital reconstruction, the bilateral orbital volume differences in the anterior, middle, and posterior angles over the medial transitional buttress were measured. Two patients required implant adjustment once after the intraoperative 3D C-arm assessment. On comparing the preoperative and postoperative findings for the zygoma, the average sum of displacement was 19.48 (range, 5.1–34.65) vs. ±1.96 (0–3.95) mm (P < 0.001) and the deviation index was 13.56 (10–24.35) vs. 2.44 (0.6–4.85) (P < 0.001). For the orbit, the mean preoperative to postoperative bilateral orbital volume difference was 3.93 (0.35–10.95) vs. 1.05 (0.12–3.61) mm3 (P <0.001). The mean difference in the bilateral angles at the transition buttress was significantly decreased postoperatively at the middle and posterior one-third. The surgical navigation system with the intraoperative 3D C-arm can effectively improve the accuracy of zygomatico-orbital fracture reconstruction and decrease implant adjustment times.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document