glaucoma drainage device
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

292
(FIVE YEARS 109)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2022 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 341
Author(s):  
Koushik Tripathy ◽  
Deepali Singhal ◽  
Ruchir Tewari ◽  
Manas Nath

Author(s):  
Silvia Schrittenlocher ◽  
C. Grass ◽  
T. Dietlein ◽  
A. Lappas ◽  
M. Matthaei ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose This study aims to assess the results, rebubbling rate, and graft survival after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with regard to the number and type of previous glaucoma surgeries. Methods This is a clinical retrospective review of 1845 consecutive DMEK surgeries between 07/2011 and 08/2017 at the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne. Sixty-six eyes were included: group 1 (eyes with previous glaucoma drainage devices (GDD); n = 27) and group 2 (eyes with previous trabeculectomy (TE); n = 39). Endothelial cell loss (ECL), central corneal thickness, graft failure, rebubbling rate, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) up to 3 years after DMEK were compared between subgroups of patients with different numbers of and the two most common types of glaucoma surgeries either GDD or TE or both. Results Re-DMEK rate due to secondary graft failure was 55.6% (15/27) in group 1 and 35.9% in group 2. The mean graft survival time in group 1 was 25 ± 11 months and 31.3 ± 8.6 months in group 2 (p = 0.009). ECL in surviving grafts in group 1 was 35% (n = 13) at 6 months, 36% at 12 months (n = 8), and 27% (n = 4) at 2 years postoperatively. In group 2, ECL in surviving grafts was 41% (n = 10) at 6 months, 36% (n = 9) at 12 months, and 38% (n = 8) at 2 years postoperatively. Rebubbling rate in group 1 was 18.5% (5/27) and 35.9% (14/39) in group 2 (p = 0.079). Conclusion Eyes with previous GDD had no higher risk for an increased rebubbling rate but a higher risk for a re-DMEK due to secondary graft failure with a mean transplant survival time of about 2 years. Compared to eyes with preexisting glaucoma drainage device, eyes after trabeculectomy had less secondary graft failures and a longer mean graft survival rate.


Author(s):  
Brandon W. Kao ◽  
Elana Meer ◽  
Thomas A. Barbolt ◽  
Richard A. Lewis ◽  
Iqbal Ike Ahmed ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Glaucoma is the leading cause of blindness worldwide. Glaucoma drainage devices and minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) often present with tradeoffs in safety and durability of efficacy. Using a rabbit model, we examined the biocompatibility and feasibility of VisiPlate, a novel, ultrathin, tubeless subconjunctival shunt comprised of a network of microchannels. Methods Six naive female New Zealand White rabbits received implants (three only in the right eye with contralateral eye untreated and three in both eyes) composed of a 400-nm-thick aluminum oxide core coated with 2 µm of parylene-C, manufactured with microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) techniques. Tonometry, slit lamp exam, clinical exam, fluorescein patency testing, and histopathology were performed. Results VisiPlate demonstrated IOP-lowering of 20–40% compared to baseline at each time point over the course of 3 months in the nine implanted eyes. All eyes developed blebs over the implant, and fluorescein testing demonstrated fluid patency at 22 days post-implantation. Slit lamp and clinical observations showed that VisiPlate was well tolerated, with low levels of conjunctival congestion, conjunctival swelling, aqueous flare, hyphema, and iris involvement from surgery that resolved over time. At sacrifice time points of 93 days and 180 days, the only notable observations were mild levels of conjunctival congestion in implanted eyes. Histopathology showed minimal tissue response and no obvious inflammation, fibrosis, or necrosis around the implant. Conclusions The results of this in vivo study demonstrate the biocompatibility and IOP-lowering effect of a multichannel, ultrathin subconjunctival shunt in a rabbit model. The data suggest that VisiPlate may safely enhance aqueous outflow and significantly reduce intraocular pressure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shouxiang NI ◽  
Zongbao GAO ◽  
Deshui RAN ◽  
Chunming ZHAO ◽  
Qiao LI

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naruka Mitsui ◽  
Kae Sugihara ◽  
Jiro Seguchi ◽  
Etsuo Chihara ◽  
Yuki Morizane ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We report a case of Corynebacterium endophthalmitis secondary to tube exposure following Baerveldt glaucoma implant surgery that was successfully treated with prompt tube withdrawal and temporary subconjunctival tube placement without removing the glaucoma drainage device. Case presentation A 65-year-old Japanese man with secondary glaucoma underwent glaucoma drainage device surgery with a donor scleral patch graft in the inferonasal quadrant of his right eye. Ten months after surgery, he presented with tube exposure due to dehiscence of the overlying conjunctiva and erosion of the scleral patch graft. Eleven days later, mild inflammation was found in the anterior chamber and anterior vitreous body, with the root of the tube surrounded by a plaque at the site of insertion in the anterior chamber. He was diagnosed with infectious endophthalmitis secondary to tube exposure. Two days later, since medical therapy was ineffective, the tube was withdrawn from the anterior chamber and irrigated with a polyvinyl alcohol-iodine solution, and the tube was tucked into the subconjunctival space. Complete resolution of the infection was achieved 1.5 months later. The tube was reinserted nasally into the anterior chamber and covered with a scleral patch graft and a free limbal conjunctival autograft. Thereafter, there has been no recurrence of infection or tube exposure. Twenty eight months after tube reinsertion, his right best-corrected visual acuity was 20/50 and intraocular pressure was 12 mmHg. Conclusion Prompt tube withdrawal and temporary subconjunctival tube placement followed by tube reinsertion may be effective for endophthalmitis associated with tube exposure after glaucoma drainage device surgery.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Knipe ◽  
Ashesh Ranchod

Eye ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeru Amrita Vallabh ◽  
Fiona Mason ◽  
Jonathan T. S. Yu ◽  
Kenneth Yau ◽  
Cecilia H. Fenerty ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
R. Agujetas ◽  
B. Kudiesh ◽  
J. I. Fernández-Vigo ◽  
Julián García-Feijóo ◽  
J. M. Montanero

AbstractThe main aim of glaucoma treatment is to reduce the intraocular pressure (IOP). One of the most common surgical treatments of glaucoma is the implantation of a glaucoma drainage device to drain the aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to a filtration bleb, where the aqueous humor is absorbed. In some cases, the excess of drainage causes ocular hypotony, which constitutes a sight-threatening complication. To prevent hypotony after this intervention, surgeons frequently introduce a suture into the device tube, which increases the hydraulic resistance of the tube and, therefore, the IOP. This study aims to provide an analytical model to correct hypotony following implantation surgery of a glaucoma drainage device, which may help glaucoma surgeons decide on hypotony treatment. The results indicate that the IOP after implanting a cylindrical tube around 300 μm in diameter is essentially the same as that built up in the filtering bleb and can hardly be controlled by introducing a straight suture unless the suture diameter is slightly lower than that of the tube. On the contrary, when the tube diameter is smaller than, for example, 100 μm, significant reductions of the IOP can be obtained by introducing a thin suture into the tube.


Author(s):  
A.S. Basinsky ◽  

Relevance. Despite many techniques for reducing intraocular pressure, surgical treatment of glaucoma has limited effectiveness. First, due to excessive scarring of new intraocular fluid outflow pathways and second, antifibrotics medicaments are unable to effectively control wound healing. The use of drainages reduces the risk of excessive scarring in the area of the filtration pad and forms several ways of outflow of intraocular fluid. The review presents the following sections: development history, advantages, disadvantages, surgical technique and promising directions of glaucoma drainage surgery. Purpose. Summarizing data on the possibility of drainage surgery, historical aspects, causes of scarring and methods of dealing with them. Provide data on various modern drainage devices that are used not only in Russia and their effectiveness. Material and methods. To perform the review, we searched for literature sources on the abstract databases E-library, PubMed and Scopus for the period up to and including 2018, using the keywords «glaucoma drainage surgery» (in the E-library database), «anti-glaucoma drainage» and «anti-glaucoma drainage device» (in the PubMed and Scopus databases). Abstracts of conferences were excluded from the review. A total of 40 articles related to the review topic were identified. The beginning of publications on this issue in domestic sources dates back to 1970, and in foreign sources to 1987. Results. The review presents the history of development, advantages, disadvantages of surgical techniques and promising areas of glaucoma drainage surgery. Various models of drainage devices, as well as their specific and non-specific complications are described. The effectivenes of various valves were 70%, with an average decrease in the level of IOP by at least 50% from the preoperative values. At the same time, the risk of an increase in the level of IOP above the target values is about 10% per year, which leads to the fact that after 5 years only in 50% of cases drainage devices function effectively. Therefore, studies of biomaterials, forms and techniques of drainage implantation surgery, new controlled-release antifibrotic drugs can positively affect the long-term effectiveness of glaucoma surgery. Conclusion. The data presented in the literature review allow us to identify the most effective models of drainage devices, their effectiveness, implantation techniques and possible complications. Key words: glaucoma, refractory glaucoma, glaucoma drainage surgery, drainages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document