Limited evidence for graft selection in pediatric ACL reconstruction: a narrative review

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is the preferred treatment to anterior cruciate ligament injury. With the increase in anterior cruciate ligament injuries in both adults and skeletally immature patients comes the need for individualized anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft selection whether it is the type of graft (auto vs. allograft) or the harvesting site (hamstrings, iliotibial band, quadriceps, patella). Several factors need to be considered preoperatively in order to optimize the patients’ recovery and restore anterior cruciate ligament strength and function. These include age and bone maturity, preoperative knee flexor/extensor strength, sport participation, patient’s needs and anatomical characteristics. This paper aims at bringing evidence supporting the use of a personalized approach in graft selection for faster and more efficient return to sport and propose a theoretical framework to support the approach.

Lateral Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With a Hamstring Allograft

Background: Medial patellar instability is rare but may occur after lateral retinacular release. The lateral patellofemoral ligament is a significant stabilizer for medial and lateral patellar displacement, and soft tissue–based reconstruction may restore its stabilizing effect. Indications: Lateral patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (LPFLR) is indicated for patellar instability failing exhaustive nonoperative measures. Technique Description: Diagnostic arthroscopy for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) status, patellar tracking, chondral status, and postoperative changes of lateral retinacular release is conducted. A 5-cm incision is made between the midpoint of the patella and the lateral epicondyle, or a single midline incision can be used if performing a concomitant MPFL reconstruction. Dissection is carried down to the lateral retinaculum and capsule, and two 1-cm incisions are made at the distal and proximal patella through the patellar and quadriceps tendon, respectively. The lateral epicondyle is then directly palpated, and two 1-cm incisions are made directly anterior and posterior to the epicondyle into the iliotibial band in full extension. A hamstring allograft is then shuttled in a V-shaped configuration from the quadriceps tendon through the iliotibial band and finally to the patellar tendon. Excess graft is trimmed and doubled over proximally and distally to replicate the normal (or contralateral) 0° to 15° of patellar eversion. Trial resting length and tension is set with temporary sutures through the proximal and distal doubled graft in full extension. The knee is taken through full range of motion to ensure there is no graft tightening in flexion or loosening in full extension. Eversion and patellar translation are then examined. Heavy nonabsorbable sutures are used to set length of the doubled allograft proximally and distally. Results: Case series of LPFLR have demonstrated significant improvements in patients’ pain, Lysholm score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and kinesiophobia with no instability events and normal range of motion at short-term follow-up. Discussion/Conclusion: Medial patellar instability can occur following lateral retinacular release and patients experiencing instability despite nonoperative treatment are likely to benefit from a soft tissue–based LPFLR. Although other nongraft-based techniques may confer similar outcomes, the authors find it more reliable to perform a lateral reconstruction as described.