Experience of small tissue bites with conventional tissue bites in emergency setting for midline abdominal wound closure

Background: Midline incision provides excellent access to the abdominal cavity. However, wound infection following a laparotomy can increase morbidity as well as burden on health care system. Wound prognosis can be influenced by the type of incisions, suture material and the method of closure. This study aimed to assess the outcome of midline abdominal wound closure using two different techniques of wound closure.Methods: This was a prospective observational study and consisted of 300 consecutive patients ≥18 years of age undergoing abdominal surgery through a midline incision in emergency setting. Patients who were included in the study were then randomised into two groups. In group I, midline laparotomy was closed with large tissue bites and in group II small tissue bites were used.Results: Out of 300 patients included in this study, 150 patients were subjected to large tissue bites and another 150 patients to small tissue bites. 29 patients out of 150 patients (19%) in large tissue bites group and 16 patients (11%) in small tissue bites developed surgical site infection (SSI). 23 patients out of 50 patients (15%) in large tissue bites group and 11 patients (7%) in small tissue bites developed wound dehiscence.Conclusions: In this study, we found that the patients in group II whose midline laprotomy was closed with small tissue bites had better wound outcome postoperatively in terms of wound site infection and wound dehiscence.

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF PREDICTORS FOR POST LAPAROTOMY ABDOMINAL WOUND DEHISCENCE

Introduction: Wound dehiscence or burst abdomen is a very serious post-operative complication which is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite the advances made in asepsis, antimicrobial drugs, sterilization and operative techniques- post-operative wound dehiscence continues to be a major threat. Aims And Objectives: 1. To nd the incidence of abdominal wound dehiscence following laparotomy in a tertiary care centre of Eastern India. 2. To evaluate the factors implicated and their contribution in abdominal wound dehiscence Methodology: This prospective single centre observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital on 100consenting patients undergoing both elective and emergency laparotomy..All the cases were followed up on postoperative days 1, 4, 7 and 10 or till discharge and further follow up was continued every 2 weeks till 4 weeks . Patients with wound dehiscence were evaluated by the investigators for the enlisted parameters which were ,age sex; BMI; comorbidities like anemia. hypoproteinemia; hypertension.jaundice,increased urea creatinine ,habit of smoking;presence of clean or contaminated wound and various other factors like time of surgery,use of steroids,ASA physical status and so on. Results: We found that wound dehiscence was signicantly more in male patients;patients with increased BMI,presence of anemia, hypoproteinemia, increased serum urea creatinine level. It was more in contaminated wound and patients with higher ASA physical status.But time taken for surgery type of surgery has no inuence on wound dehiscence in this study. Conclusion: Post laprotomy wound dehiscence depends on multiple factors.

Abdominal Wound Problem after Hysterectomy using Scalpel Versus Electrocautery for Skin and Subcutaneous Dissection

Objective: To evaluate the postoperative abdominal wound problem after hysterectomy with scalpel versus electrocautery for skin and subcutaneous dissection. Material and Methods: A total of 516 post-menopausal women having age 40 to 65 years who were planned for elective hysterectomy were included in this study. Patients having only benign disorders were included. In group E (N=258); Skin incision and tissue dissection was done using electrocautery by setting the electrocautery machine at cutting mode at 30 to 50 watts’ power. In group S (N=258); conventional scalpel was used for skin incision. Scalpel number 23 was used for skin and subcutaneous tissue dissection. Post-operative wound complications such as seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence and wound infections were primary study endpoints. Results: Mean age was 48.6±6.9 years in electrocautery and 49.2±6.3 years in scalpel group (p-value 0.30). Seroma formation was diagnosed in 98 (37.98%) patients in electrocautery group and in 52 (20.1%) patients in scalpel group (p-value <0.0001). Wound infections were diagnosed in 50 (19.3%) patients in electrocautery group versus in 87 (33.7%) patients in scalpel group (p-value 0.0002). Hematoma was diagnosed in 10 (3.87%) patients in electrocautery group and in 19 (7.4%) in scalpel group (p-value 0.08). Conclusion: The use of electrocautery is associated with lower rate of post-operative wound infections and hematoma formation. The present study advocates the use of electrocautery for skin and subcutaneous tissue dissection in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Keywords: Abdominal hysterectomy, electrocautery, scalpel, wound complications.

Abdominal Wound Dehiscence: A Review of Risk Factors, Prevention and Management in Obstetrics and Gynecology Practice

<p>Abdominal wound dehiscence (AWD) is considered as a severe postoperative complication in which there is a partial or complete disruption of an abdominal wound closure with or without protrusion and evisceration. The incidence and mortality rate varies in different health centers. Risk factors are classified into three groups, which includes: pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative. The management of Burst Abdomen or Wound Dehiscence is diverse from conservative treatment to surgical treatment.</p>

Outcome of abdominal binder in midline abdominal wound Dehiscence in terms of pain, psychological satisfaction and need for reclosure

Objective: To assess the role of abdominal binder in patients with midline wound dehiscence after elective or emergency laparotomy in terms of pain, psychological satisfaction and need for reclosure. Methods: It was a comparative study done at EAST Surgical Ward of Mayo Hospital, Lahore from 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2019. One hundred and sixty-two (162) patients were included in this study with post-operative midline abdominal wound dehiscence and after informed consent by consecutive non probability sampling technique. Patients were divided into two groups by lottery method into eighty-one patients each. Group-A included patients where abdominal binder was applied and Group-B included patients without abdominal binder. In both groups pain score, psychological satisfaction and need for reclosure was assessed and compared. Results: Patients with abdominal binder shows significantly less pain (P value =0.000) and more psychological satisfaction (P value = 0.000) as compared to the patients where abdominal binder was not used. However, there was no difference in reducing the need for reclosure in patients who use abdominal binder (P value = 0.063). Conclusion: Although abdominal binder helps in reducing the pain and improving the psychological satisfaction in patients with midline abdominal wound dehiscence yet it doesn’t help in healing of wound and reclosure of the dehisced abdominal wound is needed. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.4.3671 How to cite this:Ammar AS, Naqi SA, Khattak S, Noumani AR. Outcome of abdominal binder in midline abdominal wound Dehiscence in terms of pain, psychological satisfaction and need for reclosure. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(4):1118-1121. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.4.3671 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Prevention and management of major complications in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

BackgroundPercutaneousendoscopic gastrostomy is a commonly used endoscopic technique where a tube isplaced through the abdominal wall mainly to administer fluids, drugs and/orenteral nutrition. Several placement techniques are described in the literaturewith the ‘pull’ technique (Ponsky-Gardener) as the most popular one.Independent of the method used, placement includes a ‘blind’ perforation of thestomach through a small acute surgical abdominal wound. It is a generally safetechnique with only few major complications. Nevertheless these complicationscan be sometimes life-threatening or generate serious morbidity.MethodAnarrative review of the literature of major complications in percutaneousendoscopic gastrostomy.ResultsThis review was written from a clinical viewpoint focussing on prevention andmanagement of major complications and documentedscientific evidence with real cases from more than 20 years of clinical practice.ConclusionsMajorcomplications are rare but prevention, early recognition and popper management areimportant.

Evaluation of abdominal wound closure using continuous versus interrupted sutures in patients of perforation peritonitis

Background: The type of wound closure plays a critical role in patients of perforation peritonitis, since many of these patients also have poorly controlled co-morbidities and risk factors for wound dehiscence. Though many studies have evaluated abdominal wound closures in the elective scenario, similar studies in the emergent scenario are rather scarce. Hence, we have dealt with this issue in patients presenting with hollow viscus perforation peritonitis.Methods: This was a prospective randomized case control single-centre study with 120 patients performed at St. Stephen’s Hospital, New Delhi, India between February 2016 and January 2019. These patients were randomized divided into two groups; group A comprising those patients in whom, the abdominal wound was closed with continuous sutures, and group B comprising those in whom it was closed with interrupted sutures. Informed consent was taken from all the patients. A detailed proforma included all parameters. Follow up was conducted at 2, 4, 6 and 12 weeks from the date of surgery. Data analysis was done using S.P.S.S. version 17.Results: The time taken for continuous suture fascial closure was significantly less than the interrupted technique. There were no significant differences in other parameters, immediately or on follow-up.Conclusions: The continuous method of abdominal closure was faster than interrupted suturing on account of the use of only two terminal knots, this difference being statistically significant. The outcomes were comparable to other studies that have dealt with this issue in elective surgeries.