reporting standards
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1657
(FIVE YEARS 541)

H-INDEX

65
(FIVE YEARS 10)

BMC Medicine ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Don Husereau ◽  
Michael Drummond ◽  
Federico Augustovski ◽  
Esther de Bekker-Grob ◽  
Andrew H. Briggs ◽  
...  

AbstractHealth economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, as well as the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as health care, public health, education, social care, etc). This summary article presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist and recommendations for each item. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer reviewed journals as well as the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication. However, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, as there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making.


BMJ ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. e067975
Author(s):  
Don Husereau ◽  
Michael Drummond ◽  
Federico Augustovski ◽  
Esther de Bekker-Grob ◽  
Andrew H Briggs ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 25 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Don Husereau ◽  
Michael Drummond ◽  
Federico Augustovski ◽  
Esther de Bekker-Grob ◽  
Andrew H. Briggs ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
pp. 103-109
Author(s):  
U. Yu. Blinova ◽  
N. K. Rozhkova ◽  
D. Yu. Rozhkova

The emergence of the digital economy and increased activity in cyberspace have led to the creation of new technologies and digital products such, as non-fungible tokens (NFT). The article presents the arguments that justify the need to study NFT as an object of legal relations and an object of accounting. A brief description of these items has been given; their types and market of circulation have been studied, and, also the current legal provisions, Russian accounting standards and international financial reporting standards have been analysed. To define NFT as an accounting object, the types of accounting objects enshrined in Federal Law No. 402-FZ “On Accounting” have been considered and the criteria for their attribution in relation to NFT have been analysed. The legal and accounting problems associated with the emergence of a new object have been highlighted and the ways for further research in the field of creating an accounting methodology for NFT as a specific and highly promising digital product have been defined. 


2022 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9
Author(s):  
Don Husereau ◽  
Michael Drummond ◽  
Federico Augustovski ◽  
Esther de Bekker-Grob ◽  
Andrew H. Briggs ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document