bed sediment
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

362
(FIVE YEARS 54)

H-INDEX

35
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2021 ◽  
Vol 147 (11) ◽  
pp. 04021050
Author(s):  
Manish Pandey ◽  
Mehdi Jamei ◽  
Masoud Karbasi ◽  
Iman Ahmadianfar ◽  
Xuefeng Chu

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinjun Zhou ◽  
Jinyou Lu ◽  
Zhongwu Jin ◽  
Yuan Li ◽  
Yu Gao ◽  
...  

Following the construction of a reservoir, sediment is intercepted, which greatly reduces the sediment concentration in the discharged flow. This reduction causes riverbed scouring and flow structure adjustments downstream, thereby impacting the river habitat. This study used the generalized flume test with different bed sand compositions and discharge rates to simulate the scouring adjustment process of a sand pebble riverbed channel downstream of a reservoir. The results show that the bed sediment composition affects the water surface gradient, scour depth, turbulence intensity, and sand resistance directly after final scouring. Coarse-grained bed sediment demonstrated the greatest final turbulence intensity and sand resistance, while bed sediments with reduced coarseness exhibited a greater scouring degree; the resistance for sand grains of moderate coarseness showed the greatest change. Sand resistance was exponentially and positively correlated with the median grain size and the fractal dimension of bed sediment mass. The mass fractal dimension expression was suitable for the analysis of bed sand grain-size distribution; it contributed to the calculation of grain resistance with fewer hydraulic parameters. The relationship between the mass fractal dimension and the adjusted grain resistance was also established, which can aid the calculation of the resistance changes in sandy gravel-bed river reaches downstream of reservoirs, enabling the prediction of their effects on aquatic habitats.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Cooper ◽  
Jacob McDonald ◽  
Eric Starkey

The Southeast Coast Network (SECN) Wadeable Stream Habitat Monitoring Protocol collects data to give park resource managers insight into the status of and trends in stream and near-channel habitat conditions (McDonald et al. 2018a). Wadeable stream monitoring is currently implemented at the five SECN inland parks with wadeable streams. These parks include Horseshoe Bend National Military Park (HOBE), Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park (KEMO), Ocmulgee Mounds National Historical Park (OCMU), Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area (CHAT), and Congaree National Park (CONG). Streams at Congaree National Park chosen for monitoring were specifically targeted for management interest (e.g., upstream development and land use change, visitor use of streams as canoe trails, and potential social walking trail erosion) or to provide a context for similar-sized stream(s) within the park or network (McDonald and Starkey 2018a). The objectives of the SECN wadeable stream habitat monitoring protocol are to: Determine status of upstream watershed characteristics (basin morphology) and trends in land cover that may affect stream habitat, Determine the status of and trends in benthic and near-channel habitat in selected wadeable stream reaches (e.g., bed sediment, geomorphic channel units, and large woody debris), Determine the status of and trends in cross-sectional morphology, longitudinal gradient, and sinuosity of selected wadeable stream reaches. Between June 11 and 14, 2018, data were collected at Congaree National Park to characterize the in-stream and near-channel habitat within stream reaches on Cedar Creek (CONG001, CONG002, and CONG003) and McKenzie Creek (CONG004). These data, along with the analysis of remotely sensed geographic information system (GIS) data, are presented in this report to describe and compare the watershed-, reach-, and transect-scale characteristics of these four stream reaches to each other and to selected similar-sized stream reaches at Ocmulgee Mounds National Historical Park, Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park, and Chattahoochee National Recreation Area. Surveyed stream reaches at Congaree NP were compared to those previously surveyed in other parks in order to provide regional context and aid in interpretation of results. edar Creek’s watershed (CONG001, CONG002, and CONG003) drains nearly 200 square kilometers (77.22 square miles [mi2]) of the Congaree River Valley Terrace complex and upper Coastal Plain to the north of the park (Shelley 2007a, 2007b). Cedar Creek’s watershed has low slope and is covered mainly by forests and grasslands. Cedar Creek is designated an “Outstanding Resource Water” by the state of South Carolina (S.C. Code Regs. 61–68 [2014] and S.C. Code Regs. 61–69 [2012]) from the boundary of the park downstream to Wise Lake. Cedar Creek ‘upstream’ (CONG001) is located just downstream (south) of the park’s Bannister Bridge canoe landing, which is located off Old Bluff Road and south of the confluence with Meyers Creek. Cedar Creek ‘middle’ and Cedar Creek ‘downstream’ (CONG002 and CONG003, respectively) are located downstream of Cedar Creek ‘upstream’ where Cedar Creek flows into the relatively flat backswamp of the Congaree River flood plain. Based on the geomorphic and land cover characteristics of the watershed, monitored reaches on Cedar Creek are likely to flood often and drain slowly. Flooding is more likely at Cedar Creek ‘middle’ and Cedar Creek ‘downstream’ than at Cedar Creek ‘upstream.’ This is due to the higher (relative to CONG001) connectivity between the channels of the lower reaches and their out-of-channel areas. Based on bed sediment characteristics, the heterogeneity of geomorphic channel units (GCUs) within each reach, and the abundance of large woody debris (LWD), in-stream habitat within each of the surveyed reaches on Cedar Creek (CONG001–003) was classified as ‘fair to good.’ Although, there is extensive evidence of animal activity...


2021 ◽  
Vol 147 (5) ◽  
pp. 04021009
Author(s):  
Erfan Ghasemi Tousi ◽  
Jennifer G. Duan ◽  
Patricia M. Gundy ◽  
Kelly R. Bright ◽  
Charles P. Gerba

CATENA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 200 ◽  
pp. 105173
Author(s):  
Kazem Nosrati ◽  
Mojtaba Akbari-Mahdiabad ◽  
Peter Fiener ◽  
Adrian L. Collins

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rory Walsh ◽  
Carla Ferreira ◽  
William Blake ◽  
Sam Higton ◽  
Antonio Ferreira

<p>This paper explores the potential for using multiple particle size fractions in a hierarchical geochemical sediment fingerprinting approach to the assessment of changes in sediment sources through time within a small Mediterranean peri-urban catchment. Conventional  sediment fingerprinting has focussed on the <63µm fraction of fine bed-sediment on the basis that this fraction represents suspended sediment, which in turn is considered dominant over bedload in catchment sediment budgets. In reality, however, coarser sediment than 63µm may form part of suspended sediment and/or occurs as relatively fast-moving fine bedload.  Furthermore, sediment sources vary in their particle size distribution and, as geochemical composition can vary with particle size, it is arguable that sediment fingerprinting studies should consider use of multiple size fractions.</p><p>This study explores this approach using <63µm, 63-125µm, 125-250 µm and 250-2000µm size fractions.  It focuses on the north-south flowing Ribeira dos Covões catchment (6.2 km<sup>2</sup>), on the outskirts of Coimbra in central Portugal. The climate is humid Mediterranean. Catchment geology is 56% sandstone (in the east), 41 % marly limestone (in the west) and 3 % alluvium. Current land-use is 56% woodland, 4 % agricultural and 40% urban (mainly residential, but also including a recently constructed enterprise park (5%) and major highway (1%)). Recent urbanization has largely occupied former agricultural land. </p><p>The study adopts a multi-proxy sediment fingerprinting approach to assessment of changes in sediment sources, based on geochemical (elemental) characterization of the four different size fractions of fluvial bed-sediment and soil samples, using a Niton x-ray fluorescence (XRF) elemental analyser. Sampling of fluvial sediment was carried out at 33 sites within the stream network (including all significant tributaries, downstream sites and the catchment outlet). Samples were collected in July 2018 and November 2018 following contrasting ‘late-wet-season’ and ‘end-of-dry-season’ events. In July 2018, samples of potential sediment sources were collected including: (i) soil surface (0-2cm) samples at 64 locations, (ii) 17 samples from eroding channel margin sites, and (iii) 15 samples of road sediment. All fluvial and soil samples were sieved to obtain the four target size fractions. The elemental geochemistry of each sample fraction at all fluvial and source sites was derived using the XRF analyser.  (These results were added to similar datasets previously obtained on three occasions in 2012-15 in a period of enhanced urban constructional disturbance). Differences (and similarities) in geochemical signatures between the different size fractions at each survey date at and between each tributary and potential source site were assessed using a range of statistical techniques.  Messages arising are discussed. For each size fraction and survey date, Bayesian unmixing models were used in a hierarchical (confluence-based) fashion to assess the contributions of sub-catchments to downstream sites and the catchment outlet. Modelling results for the two 2018 events were validated by comparing them with suspended sediment records collected at five tributary locations and at the catchment outlet.  Although overall, the modelling was successful in indicating and quantifying significant changes in sediment sources through time within the catchment, uncertainties in interpretation of the multiple fractions are identified and discussed. </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document