A phase I study of oral vitamin D3 supplementation in boys with X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy

Objective: Vitamin D status has been linked to risk of inflammatory brain lesions. We sought to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral vitamin D dosing regimens in boys with X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD). Methods: In this open-label, multi-center, phase I study, we enrolled 21 ALD males without brain lesions, aged 1.5 to 25 years to oral vitamin D supplementation for 12 months. Our primary outcome was attainment of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in target range (40-80ng/ml) at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included safety and glutathione levels in brain and blood. Participants were initially assigned to a fixed dosing regimen starting at 2,000 IU daily, regardless of weight. Following a mid-study safety assessment, we modified the dosing regimen so all subsequent participants were assigned to a weight-stratified dosing regimen starting as low as 1,000 IU daily. Results: Between October 2016 and June 2019, we recruited 21 participants (n=12 fixed dose; n=9 weight-stratified) with a median age and weight of 6.7 years and 20 kilograms. Most participants achieved target plasma vitamin D levels at 6 and 12 months regardless of dosing regimen. In the fixed dose regimen, 6 of 12 participants had asymptomatic elevation in urine calcium:creatinine or plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D; no laboratory deviations occurred with the weight-stratified regimen. Glutathione levels increased between baseline and 12 months in the brain but not in the blood. Conclusions: Our weight-stratified vitamin D dosing regimen was well-tolerated and achieved target 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in most participants. Brain glutathione levels increased over the 12-month trial period. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that a weight-stratified dosing regimen of vitamin D supplementation is safe, well-tolerated, and effective at achieving moderately high vitamin D levels in boys with ALD.

Model-based efficacy and toxicity comparisons of moxifloxacin for multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis

Background Moxifloxacin (MOX) is used as a first-choice drug to treat multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), however, evidence-based dosing optimization should be strengthened by integrative analysis. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate MOX efficacy and toxicity using integratvie model-based approaches in MDR-TB patients. Methods In total, 113 MDR-TB patients from five different clinical trials were analyzed for the development of a population pharmacokinetics (PK) model. A final population PK model was merged with a previously developed lung-lesion distribution and QT prolongation model. Monte Carlo simulation was used to calculate the probability target attainment (PTA) value based on concentration. An area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-based target was identified as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of MOX isolated from MDR-TB patients. Results The presence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) increased clearance by 32.7% and decreased the AUC by 27.4%, compared with HIV-negative MDR-TB patients. A daily dose of 800 mg or a 400 mg twice daily dose of MOX is expected to be effective in MDR-TB patients with an MIC of ≤ 0.25 µg/mL, regardless of PK differences resulting from the presence of HIV. The effect of MOX in HIV-positive MDR-TB patients tended to be decreased dramatically from 0.5 µg/mL, in contrast to the findings in HIV-negative patients. A regimen of twice-daily doses of 400 mg should be considered safer than an 800 mg once-daily dosing regimen, because of the narrow fluctuation of concentrations. Conclusions Our results suggest that a 400 mg twice-daily dose of MOX is an optimal dosing regimen for MDR-TB patients because it provides superior efficacy and safety.

Community Pharmacists' Attitudes and Practice in the Management of Minor Ailments

This study aimed to know the attitudes and practice of pharmacists regarding the management of minor ailments in Iraqi community pharmacies. A cross-sectional study for 320 community pharmacists was conducted during February 2020 using a newly developed and validated questionnaire. Only 4.4% of pharmacists prefer not to deal with minor ailment cases. Minority (15.6%) of participated pharmacists refer more than half of minor ailment cases they face to the physician. Regarding the assessment of minor ailments using WWHAM technique, what are the symptoms are the most commonly asked questions by pharmacists. Only 49.1% mentioned that they ask all WWHAM questions. On the other hand, most pharmacists (90%) educate their patients about the dosing regimen. Meanwhile, less than 10% of pharmacists provide their patients with all possible information about their medications. All demographic factors had no effect on the pharmacists' usage of WWHAM technique and in pharmacist's role in patient counseling or education. In conclusion minor ailment services that provided by community pharmacists' in Iraq was poor at which most pharmacists don't use WWHAM technique appropriately and also fail to provide their patients with the required medication counseling and education.

Assessing Blood-Based Biomarkers to Define a Therapeutic Window for Natalizumab

Natalizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds CD49d. Although it is one of the most effective treatments for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS), a dosing regimen has not been optimized for safety and efficacy in individual patients. We aimed to identify biomarkers to monitor Natalizumab treatment and to establish a personalized dose utilizing an ongoing longitudinal study in 29 RRMS patients under Natalizumab with standard interval dose (SD) of 300 mg/4wks or extended interval dose (EID) of 300 mg/6wks. Blood samples were analyzed by flow cytometry to determine CD49d saturation and expression in several T and B lymphocytes subpopulations. Each patient was analyzed at two different timepoints separated by 3 Natalizumab administrations. Natalizumab and sVCAM-1 levels in serum were also analyzed using ELISA. To determine the reproducibility of various markers, two different timepoints were compared and no significant differences were observed for CD49d expression nor for saturation; SD patients had higher saturation levels (~80%) than EID patients (~60%). A positive correlation exists between CD49d saturation and Natalizumab serum levels. CD49d expression and saturation are stable parameters that could be used as biomarkers in the immunomonitoring of Natalizumab treatment. Moreover, Natalizumab and sVCAM-1 serum levels could be used to optimize an individual’s dosing schedule.

341 Observational multicentre study on effectiveness and tolerability of Alirocumab in real world, the OMERO study: interim data from the first 699 patients

Aims OMERO is a prospective study, aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of alirocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9-i), in the real life in Italy. The study is planned to include 800 patients, from 40 Italian sites, treated with alirocumab on top of standard lipid lowering therapy. Methods and results This analysis concerns 699 (out of 800) patients with all data available: 65.5% male; mean age 60.6 ± 11.09 years; 29.6% with HeFH in primary prevention; 70.4% in secondary prevention (with/without HeFH). Before ALI administration, 461 patients (66%) were treated with statins while 231 (33%) reported statin intolerance, that resulted in the statin discontinuation. Mean baseline LDL-C was 161.5 ± (53.07) mg/dl. Based on clinical judgement, ALI was initially prescribed at 75 mg Q2W dosing regimen in 60.80% of participants, whereas the remainder received 150 mg Q2W. At V1 57 patients (89.06%) switch from 75 mg Q2W to 150 mg Q2W and 7 patients (10.94%) from 150 mg Q2W to 75 mg Q2W. LDL-C level reduction from baseline (before ALI administration) to 6 months from the study enrolment (V1), was −45% (V1: mean LDL-C was 73.5 ± 45.70 mg/dl). LDL-C levels at V1 by participant category are shown in Figure 1. The rate of patients with at least one adverse event was 25.6% (of which SAE 7.4%); the rate of patients with at least one related adverse reaction to treatment was 3.8% none of them were serious. Conclusions OMERO confirmed in clinical practice the results observed in trials: a significant reduction of LDL-C was observed with ALI 75/150 mg Q2W in participants at high CV risk with or without HeFH. ALI was generally well tolerated.