Latissimus dorsi muscle flap transfer through endoscopic approach combined with the implant after tissue expansion for breast reconstruction of mastectomy patients

Background Implant-based breast reconstruction is easy to be performed but has flaws that an unnatural appearance might be presented when no sufficient coverage existing. While autologous tissue reconstruction also has disadvantages like donor site scar and skin patch effect. There is a demand for a new method to obtain natural and aesthetic appearance while surmounting drawbacks of conventional breast reconstruction surgery. Methods A retrospective review of thirty-one patients undergoing tissue expander (TE)/implant two-stage breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi muscle flap (LDMF) transfer through endoscopic approach in Peking University Third Hospital from April 2016 to August 2020 was performed. The LDMF harvest time, drain time, and complications were reviewed. The 3D volume was obtained to assess the volume symmetry of bilateral breasts. The BREAST-Q reconstruction module was used to evaluate the satisfaction. Results The mean endoscopic LDMF harvest time was 90.4 min. In the mean follow-up of 11.2 months, there were no severe capsular contracture happened. The reconstructed side achieved good volume symmetry to the contralateral side (P = 0.256). Based on the evaluation of the BREAST-Q scores, the outcome of Satisfaction with Breasts was excellent or good in 87.1% of the cases. Conclusions The novel type of two-stage breast reconstruction protocol, which includes tissue expansion followed by implant insertion with endoscopy-assisted LDMF transfer, could effectively reduce visible scars, avoid the patch effect, while require short time for LDMF harvest and present low incidence of complications. It is a promising method for breast reconstruction because it achieves good outcomes in the mastectomy patients.

A Retrospective Study of Latissimus Dorsi Flap in Immediate Breast Reconstruction

BackgroundThere are many different methods used for immediate breast reconstruction, but the advantages and disadvantages between distinct methods are not reported and compared directly.MethodsWe collected the data of patients who underwent breast reconstruction from 2010 to 2015 and classified a total of 103 patients into three groups: i) skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant and partial latissimus dorsi flap (MIPLD); ii) skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy with the whole latissimus dorsi flap (MWLD); and iii) breast-conserving surgery and partial latissimus dorsi flap (BCSPLD). The outcome, safety, and cosmetic outcome of the latissimus dorsi muscle flap with or without implant were reported and compared.ResultsThe procedures were successful in all cases. None of the patients had severe complications. The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival is 94.2%. All the patients exhibited good arm and back function. Based on the evaluation of the BREAST-Q score, the cosmetic outcome of Satisfaction with Breasts was excellent or good in 97.8% of the cases.ConclusionsMIPLD, MWLD, and BCSPLD stand for three distinct methods for immediate breast reconstruction with good outcome and aesthetic effect. They were safe, were easy to perform, and provided quick recovery and good quality of life. Therefore, these three breast reconstructive methods are worthy of widespread use in clinical practice and provide different ways to reconstruct the breast according to the patients’ conditions and preferences.

Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap Transfer Through Endoscopic Approach Combined With the Implant After Tissue Expansion for Breast Reconstruction of Mastectomy Patients

Background: The increasing demand for breast reconstruction and good outcomes lead plastic surgeons to look for a new method to obtain more natural and aesthetically pleasing appearance of the reconstructed breasts.Methods: A retrospective review of thirty-one patients undergoing tissue expander (TE)/implant two-stage breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi muscle flap (LDMF) transfer through endoscopic approach in Peking University Third Hospital from April 2016 to August 2020 was performed. The LDMF harvest time, drain time, and complications were reviewed. The 3D volume was obtained to assess the symmetry of bilateral breasts.Results: The mean endoscopic LDMF harvest time was 90.4 minutes (70.0~120.0 min). The average drain time after the final reconstruction was 10.1 days (6~19 days). In the mean follow-up of 11.2 months (6~28 months), there were no postoperative complications noted. The average post–reconstruction breasts asymmetry was 4.8%±2.4%, the reconstructed side achieved good volume symmetry to the contralateral side (P=0.256).Conclusions: The novel type of two-stage breast reconstruction protocol, which includes tissue expansion followed by implant insertion with endoscopy-assisted LDMF transfer, could effectively reduce visible scars, avoid the patch effect, shorten the LDMF harvest time and reduce the incidence of complications. It is a promising method for breast reconstruction because it achieves good outcomes in the mastectomy patients.

Abrupt Aggravation of Encapsulated Seroma after Breast Reconstruction with Extended Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap

A 57-year-old woman underwent salvage nipple-preserving mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction using extended latissimus dorsi muscle flap for her in-breast recurrence. The patient had been well with a presumed encapsulated seroma in her back for 8 years and 3 months but suddenly developed a protrusion of the persistent seroma. The patient requested us to improve the cosmetic deterioration of the visible large protrusion. In the operation, the operative target was converted from the newly protruded portion to the whole persistent seroma due to the leakage of presumed contaminated fluid. The posterior wall of the long-lasting seroma sticked rigidly to the ribs, forcing us not to resect the whole capsule but to resect the anterior and lateral walls with scraping the posterior wall with a curet. Pathological study showed a dense fibrous capsule, amorphous eosinophilic material, cholesterin crystals, and massive histiocyte infiltration. Postoperative course was uneventful, but wound healing was not observed over 3 weeks after operation. Minocycline 100 mg diluted in 20 mL saline was injected into the seroma cavity after full aspiration of the seroma fluid, causing immediate irritable sensation around the seroma cavity and complete disappearance of the seroma cavity in 3 weeks after the minocycline injection. Pathogenesis of this extremely rare complication remains uncertain, but long-lasting seroma formation should be avoided not to cause this type of late-phase complication. Minocycline injection into the seroma cavity is a feasible method to accelerate the wound healing.

Successful Microsurgical Reconstruction for Limb Salvage in a COVID-19-Positive Patient: A Case Report

Background Although the novel 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic delayed elective microsurgical reconstruction cases, traumatic injuries requiring microsurgical reconstruction for limb salvage still presented to our hospital. Recent data suggests a link between COVID-19 and increased venous and arterial thromboembolic events, theoretically increasing the risk of microvascular anastomotic thrombosis and flap failure. Methods We provide a single case report of microsurgical limb salvage in a COVID-19-positive patient with a Gustilo IIIb open tibial-fibular fracture. Results A free latissimus dorsi muscle flap was used to successfully cover a Gustilo IIIb open tibial-fibular fracture with exposed orthopedic hardware and large soft tissue defect, with 5-month follow-up demonstrating a well-healed flap allowing for preserved ambulation. Conclusion Although there is a theoretical increased incidence of venous and arterial thrombotic microvascular failure in COVID-19-positive patients, microsurgical reconstruction is occasionally the lone option for salvage. Microsurgical reconstruction in this population must be carefully considered, meticulously executed, and closely monitored.