mood dysregulation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

269
(FIVE YEARS 69)

H-INDEX

29
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (10) ◽  
pp. S301-S302
Author(s):  
Melissa P. DelBello ◽  
Du Lei ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
Kun Quin ◽  
Max Tallman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Carl Fleisher ◽  
Laurel L. Williams ◽  
Carlene MacMillan ◽  
Chris Grimes ◽  
Owen S. Muir ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 102-103
Author(s):  
Hugo André de Lima Martins

Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder in children and adolescents is characterized by chronic irritability, in which outbursts of anger are manifested either verbally or through aggressive behavior. Before the last update of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (DSM-5), many severely irritable children were diagnosed with bipolar disorder. A borderline personality disorder is characterized by emotional instability, episodes of anger, impulsivity, and irritability; therefore, it is often misidentified as bipolar disorder. The behavior of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder resembles many characteristics of borderline, which diagnosis usually occurs in young adulthood. Is disruptive mood dysregulation disorder a precursor for borderline disorder?


Author(s):  
Ines Mürner-Lavanchy ◽  
Michael Kaess ◽  
Julian Koenig

AbstractDisruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD) involves non-episodic irritability and frequent severe temper outbursts in children. Since the inclusion of the diagnosis in the DSM-5, there is no established gold-standard in the assessment of DMDD. In this systematic review of the literature, we provide a synopsis of existing diagnostic instruments for DMDD. Bibliographic databases were searched for any studies assessing DMDD. The systematic search of the literature yielded K = 1167 hits, of which n = 110 studies were included. The most frequently used measure was the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia DMDD module (25%). Other studies derived diagnostic criteria from interviews not specifically designed to measure DMDD (47%), chart review (7%), clinical diagnosis without any specific instrument (6%) or did not provide information about the assessment (9%). Three structured interviews designed to diagnose DMDD were used in six studies (6%). Interrater reliability was reported in 36% of studies (ranging from κ = 0.6–1) while other psychometric properties were rarely reported. This systematic review points to a variety of existing diagnostic measures for DMDD with good reliability. Consistent reporting of psychometric properties of recently developed DMDD interviews, as well as their further refinement, may help to ascertain the validity of the diagnosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document