future of food
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

267
(FIVE YEARS 80)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2022 ◽  
pp. 183-201
Author(s):  
Weihao Meng ◽  
Taihua Mu ◽  
Garcia-Vaquero Marco

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Wiebe ◽  
Steven Prager

This document is one of a collection of three working papers and a synthesis brief edited by Steven Prager and Keith Wiebe and prepared as part of foresight-related research supported by the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM). This synthesis brief and the three working papers, along with other related materials, are intended to provide a forward-looking perspective on key issues to support discussion on food, land, and water systems transformation.


10.1596/36497 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Townsend ◽  
Dorte Verner ◽  
Abimbola Adubi ◽  
Jean Saint-Geours ◽  
Izabela Leao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-234
Author(s):  
Mousa Bamir ◽  
◽  
Atousa Poursheikhali ◽  
Ali Masoud ◽  
◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 123 (9) ◽  
pp. 2953-2958
Author(s):  
Siew-Wei Yeong ◽  
Mukvinder Kaur Sandhu ◽  
Hiram Ting

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ella Houzer ◽  
Ian Scoones

Urgent climate challenges have triggered calls for radical, widespread changes in what we eat, pushing for the drastic reduction if not elimination of animal-source foods from our diets. But high-profile debates, based on patchy evidence, are failing to differentiate between varied landscapes, environments and production methods. Relatively low-impact, extensive livestock production, such as pastoralism, is being lumped in with industrial systems in the conversation about the future of food. This report warns that the dominant picture of livestock’s impacts on climate change has been distorted by faulty assumptions that focus on intensive, industrial farming in rich countries. Millions of people worldwide who depend on extensive livestock production, with relatively lower climate impacts, are being ignored by debates on the future of food. The report identifies ten flaws in the way that livestock’s climate impacts have been assessed, and suggests how pastoralists could be better included in future debates about food and the climate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-263
Author(s):  
Eileen T. Kennedy ◽  
Judith L. Buttriss ◽  
Isabelle Bureau‐Franz ◽  
Petra Klassen Wigger ◽  
Adam Drewnowski
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document