access barriers
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

230
(FIVE YEARS 102)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Sushil Mohan

The paper analyses the trade barriers that thwart diversification efforts of developing countries into exports of value-added agricultural processed products. It examines the extent to which non-tariff measures act as market access barriers that constrain agricultural processed products exports from developing countries. The analysis shows that the prevalence of non-tariff measures (including domestic non-tariff measures) limit the ability of developing countries to increase their agricultural processed exports. This has important policy implications in terms of the emphasis that trade negotiators and policy planners should place on addressing non-tariff measures both in the domestic and foreign markets.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e045575
Author(s):  
Freddie Ssengooba ◽  
Doreen Tuhebwe ◽  
Steven Ssendagire ◽  
Susan Babirye ◽  
Martha Akulume ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThis study explored the experiences of accessing care across the border in East Africa.ParticipantsFrom February to June 2018, a cross-sectional study using qualitative and quantitative methods was conducted among 279 household adults residing along selected national border sites of Uganda, Kenya and Rwanda and had accessed care from the opposite side of the border 5 years prior to this study.SettingAccess to HIV treatment, maternal delivery and childhood immunisation services was explored. We applied the health access framework and an appreciative inquiry approach to identify factors that enabled access to the services.MeasuresExploratory factor analysis and linear regression were used for quantitative data, while deductive content analysis was done for the qualitative data on respondent’s experiences navigating health access barriers.ResultsThe majority of respondents (83.9%; 234/279) had accessed care from public health facilities. Nearly one-third (77/279) had sought care across the border more than a year ago and 22.9% (64/279) less than a month ago. From the linear regression, the main predictor for ease of access for healthcare were ‘‘ease of border crossing’ (regression coefficient (RegCoef) 0.381); ‘services being free’ (RegCoef 0.478); ‘services and medicines availability’ (RegCoef 0.274) and ‘acceptable quality of services’ (RegCoef 0.364). The key facilitators for successful navigation of access barriers were related to the presence of informal routes, speaking a similar language and the ability to pay for the services.ConclusionCommunities resident near national borders were able to cross borders to seek healthcare. There is need for a policy environment to enable East Africa invest better and realise synergies for these communities. This will advance Universal Health Coverage goals for communities along the border who represent the far fang areas of the health system with multiple barriers to healthcare access.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (04) ◽  
pp. e286-e292
Author(s):  
Camila Moreno-Bencardino ◽  
Laura Zuluaga ◽  
Jaime Perez ◽  
Camila Cespedes ◽  
Catalina Forero ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Although there is an increasing experience in the management of transgender individuals, this has not been thoroughly explored in children. The need to establish a comprehensive and transdisciplinary management is of critical importance. In order to solve this issue, we want to report the results of a cohort of individuals with gender dysphoria (GD) seen by our transdisciplinary group from a social and clinical and health access perspective. Methods A 10-year retrospective case series of all patients that had been seen by our transdisciplinary team was reviewed. The main demographic characteristics were described, as well as impact variables in terms of diagnosis and treatment of these individuals. A social description of each individual was described. Frequency, distribution, and central tendency measures were evaluated for data presentation. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) software was used. Results Four cases of GD were included. Three had male to female dysphoria and one female to male. The median reported age of GD awareness was 6 years old (between 4 and 8 years old), and the median time between GD awareness and the 1st medical evaluation was 7 years for all individuals. The median age at gender role expression was 12 years old (between 10 and 14 years old). All patients had already assumed their experienced gender role before the 1st evaluation by our group. The median age at the 1st evaluation by our group was 13 years old (between 10 and 16 years old); three of the patients were evaluated after initiation of puberty. In the present study, individuals with GD demonstrated having health care access barriers for their transition process. Referral times are high, and individuals with GD are cared after pubertal development, which is related to suboptimal outcomes. The spectrum of GD is broad, and management must be individualized according to expectations. Conclusion Individuals with GD face multiple access barriers that limit their possibility of being seen by a transdisciplinary team. This reflects in longer waiting times that negatively impact medical management. Gender dysphoria is a wide spectrum, and individuals should be evaluated individually by a transdisciplinary team.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 836-836
Author(s):  
Sreejith Sudhakar ◽  
Justin Jose ◽  
Shanuga Cherayi

Abstract We examined the determinants of healthcare access barriers, treatment-seeking, and self-medication in older women aged 60 years and more, using a cross-sectional survey design. Using a structured interview format, we interviewed 1005 older women from 7 out of 14 districts in the state through a stratified random sampling procedure. Multiple linear regression analysis results reveal that older women's healthcare access barriers significantly increased when they experienced a long duration of multimorbidity alongside poor recognition of autonomy and basic amenities available at health facilities. However, confidentiality, the ability to pay for healthcare expenditure, and the type of health care significantly improved healthcare access. In factors influencing older women's delay in treatment-seeking, optimal instrumental functionality in daily living, optimal quality of life and access to healthcare services significantly reduced delay in treatment initiation. Whereas poor health-seeking behaviors, long duration of multimorbidity, and the quality of basic amenities at hospitals significantly increased treatment initiation delay and explained 13.6% of the variance. In factors influencing older women's use of self-medication, advancing age, living in rural areas, optimal functionality, perception of providers' respect for confidentiality were associated with increased self-medication frequency. Whereas, better wealth status, prompt attention to older women's health needs, and basic amenities at hospitals significantly reduced their self-medication practice. Therefore, the optimal functional abilities, fewer morbidities, and optimal health system responsiveness significantly reduce healthcare access barriers and self-medication while improving older women's treatment-seeking behaviors.


Author(s):  
Cheng Gao ◽  
Sarah Osmundson ◽  
Bradley Malin ◽  
You Chen

Objectives: Like other areas of care affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth (both audio and video) was rapidly adopted in the obstetric setting. We performed a retrospective analysis of electronic health record (EHR) data to characterize the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with telehealth utilization among patients who received prenatal care. Materials and Methods: The study period covered March 23rd, 2020 to July 2nd, 2020, during which time 2,521 patients received prenatal care at a large academic medical center. We applied a generalized logistic regression to measure the relationship between the patients’ sociodemographic factors (in terms of age, race, ethnicity, urbanization level, and insurance type), pregnancy complications (namely, type 2 diabetes, chronic hypertension, and fetal growth restriction), and telehealth usage, as documented in the EHR. Results: During the study period, 2,521 patients had 16,516 prenatal care visits. 938 (37.2%) of the patients participated in at least one of 1,934 virtual prenatal care visits. Prenatal visits were more likely to be conducted through telehealth for patients who were older than 25 years old and lived in rural areas. In addition, patients who were with type 2 diabetes were more likely to use telehealth in their prenatal care (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 7.247 [95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 4.244 – 12.933]). By contrast, patients from racial and ethnic minority groups were less likely to have a telehealth encounter compared to white or non-Hispanic patients (aOR 0.603 [95% CI 0.465 – 0.778] and aOR 0.663 [95% CI 0.471 – 0.927], respectively). Additionally, patients who were on state-level Medicaid were less likely to use telehealth (aOR 0.495 [95% CI 0.402 – 0.608]). Discussion: Disparities in telehealth use for prenatal care suggest further investigations into access barriers. Hispanic patients who had low English language proficiency may not willing to see doctors via virtual care. Availability of high-speed internet and/or hardware may hold these patients who were insured through state-level Medicaid back due to poverty. Future work is advised to minimize access barriers to telehealth in its implementation. Conclusions: While telehealth expanded prenatal care access for childbearing women during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study suggested that there were non-trivial differences in the demographics of patients who utilized such settings.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliane Winkelmann ◽  
Jesús Gómez Rossi ◽  
Falk Schwendicke ◽  
Antonia Dimova ◽  
Elka Atanasova ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Oral health has received increased attention over the past few years coupled with rising awareness on the impact of limited dental care coverage for oral health and general health and well-being. The purpose of the study was to compare the statutory coverage and access to dental care for adult services in 11 European countries using a vignette approach.Methods: We used three patient vignettes to highlight the differences of the dimensions of coverage and access to dental care (coverage, cost-sharing and accessibility). The three vignettes describe typical care pathways for patients with the most common oral health conditions (caries, periodontal disease, edentulism). The vignettes were completed by health services researchers knowledgeable on dental care, dentists, or teams consisting of a health systems expert working together with dental specialists.Results: Completed vignettes were received from 11 countries, including Bulgaria, Estonia, France, Germany, Republic of Ireland (Ireland), Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia and Sweden. While emergency dental care, tooth extraction and restorative care for acute pain due to carious lesions are covered in most responding countries, root canal treatment, periodontal care and prosthetic restoration often require cost-sharing or are entirely excluded from the benefit basket. Regular dental visits are also limited to one visit per year in many countries. Beyond financial barriers due to out-of-pocket payments, patients may experience very different kinds of physical barriers to access dental care. Major access barriers to public dental care represent the limited availability of contracted dentists especially in rural areas and the unequal distribution and lack of specialised dentists.Conclusions: According to the results, statutory coverage of dental care varies across European countries while access barriers are largely similar. Many dental services require substantial cost-sharing in most countries which in turn leads to high out-of-pocket spending. The individual socioeconomic status is thus a main determinant for access to dental care, but also other factors such as geography, age and comorbidities can inhibit access and affect outcomes. Moreover, coverage in most oral health systems is targeted at treatment and less at preventative oral health care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document