Family Caregiver Burden of Medication Administration for Older Adults Admitted to Home Hospice

Objective: To characterize FCG burden of medication administration for older adults in home hospice. Methods: Pilot clinical trial of a hospice-staff level communication and medication review program to facilitate goal-concordant prescribing, including deprescribing, for older adults in home hospice. Patients newly admitted to hospice were eligible if >=65 years, prescribed >= 5 medications and had a FCG. Exclusion criteria included being non-English speaking or having a Palliative Performance Score<40. Measurements include 24-item FCG Medication Administration Hassle Scale (range 0-96) at hospice admission and at 2-, 4-, 6-, 8-weeks and monthly until death. Descriptive statistics characterize baseline FCG Hassle score. Results: In this actively recruiting study, n=9 patient-caregiver dyads are enrolled to date. Mean patient age is 80.6 years (range 69-101). Of 9 caregivers, 7 were female, 5 children, and 3 spouses. The majority (67%) of caregivers were extremely involved in medication management. Mean FCG Hassle Score =17.1 (SE 5.9; range 2-58), and differed between spouses (mean =5 [SE 1.7; range 2-8]) and children (mean =31.4 [SE 9.53; range 3-58]). The highest burden concern was recognizing medication side effects, followed by feeling comfortable making medication decisions, arguing with the care-recipient about when to take medications, knowing why a medication is being given and whether it is effective, and knowing when to hold, increase, decrease a dose or discontinue the medication. Conclusion: FCGs of older adults in home hospice report different levels of medication administration hassle depending on their relationship to the patient. The most bothersome concern is recognizing medication side effects.

Pharmacogenetic Testing in an Academic Psychiatric Clinic: A Retrospective Chart Review

Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is being increasingly recognized by clinicians as an essential tool to guide medication decisions for treatment of psychiatric illnesses. Extensive implementation of PGx testing, however, varies by setting and location. In this retrospective study, we reviewed charts from 592 patients diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder at the Loyola University Medical Center, for whom PGx testing was performed. Information collected included demographics at the time of testing, psychiatric diagnosis, medical and psychiatric history and medications prior and after PGx testing. Of the 592 charts analyzed, the most common primary diagnoses were depression (52%) and anxiety (12%). Prior to PGx testing, 72% of patients were prescribed three or more medications, whereas, after testing, only 44% were prescribed three or more medications included in the test panel (p < 0.0001). The most common clinical consideration on the PGx reports was recommendation to reduce dosages (33%). After PGx testing, the proportion of patients taking incongruent medications decreased from 26% to 19% and that of patients taking congruent medications increased from 74% to 81% (p = 0.006). The results from this retrospective data analysis demonstrated a reduction in polypharmacy and an increase in recommendation-congruent medication prescribing resulting from implementation of PGx testing.

Barriers and Enablers to Shared Decision Making in Psychiatric Medication Management: A Qualitative Investigation of Clinician and Service Users' Views

Shared decisionmaking (SDM) is a recommended health communication approach in mental health settings. Yet, implementation of SDM in psychiatric consultations discussing medication management is challenging. Insufficient attention has been given to examine the views of both clinicians and service users together about the experiences of SDM in psychiatric medication management. The purpose of this paper is to examine the views of service users, community psychiatric nurses, and psychiatrists about enablers and barriers of SDM. A thematic analysis of 30 semi structured interviews with service users, psychiatrists, and community psychiatric nurses, in a community mental health team in the UK, was conducted. A service user advisory group was involved in all phases of the research cycle, including data collection, analysis, and dissemination. The results offer a detailed contextualized account of how medication decisions are made. For psychiatrists and service user participants SDM is seen as a way of enhancing service users' engagement in and control over treatment decisions. While psychiatrists value the transactional benefits of SDM, service user participants and psychiatric nurses conceptualize SDM as a long-term endeavor embedded within therapeutic partnerships. For service users these partnerships mitigate acknowledged problems of feeling unable to be fully involved during times of crisis. This study identified a range of barriers and facilitators to SDM concerning psychiatric medications from the lived experience of service users and the professional experience of clinicians. Furthermore, it indicates new potential intervention points to support SDM in psychiatric medication decisions.

Improving Patient-Pharmacist Encounters with Over-The-Counter Medications: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study

Background and Objectives: Over-the-counter (OTC) medication use has increased safety risks for adults older than 65. Most older adults purchase OTC medications from community pharmacies, where the considerable distance or visual obstructions between the prescription area and OTC aisles undermine pharmacists’ ability to assist patients with OTC medication decisions. An innovative redesign of an abbreviated medication section specifically for older adults (called the Senior SectionTM) can facilitate pharmacy staff/patient interaction, potentially improving safe medication selection and use. This study evaluated the impact of the Senior Section on the frequency and content of OTC encounters between pharmacy staff and patients. Research Design and Methods: An intervention mixed-methods design generated data from patient OTC encounters, and interviews with two pharmacists and two technicians, throughout the study. NVivo was used to code interview transcripts, and frequencies and chi-square analyses demonstrated pre/post-intervention comparisons for the OTC encounter variables. Results: After Senior Section implementation, pharmacy staff were more likely to initiate (and be involved in) patient encounters, address more topics or problem/symptoms, provide details about OTC products, discuss appropriateness of OTC use, and discuss medication classes highlighted in the Senior Section. Pharmacy staff were less likely to need to leave the prescription department for extended periods; they also had fewer prolonged encounters or encounters about product location. Importantly, the Senior Section did not impede pharmacy workflow. Discussion and Implications: The Senior Section prompted more frequent, effective, and efficient engagements between pharmacy staff and patients, which may substantially reduce OTC-related harms among older adults. Article Type: Original Research