FXa cleaves the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and blocks cell entry to protect against infection with inferior effects in B.1.1.7 variant

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Human natural defense mechanisms against SARS-CoV-2 are largely unknown. Serine proteases (SPs) including furin and TMPRSS2 cleave SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, facilitating viral entry. Here, we show that FXa, a SP for blood coagulation, is upregulated in COVID 19 patients compared to non-COVID-19 donors and exerts anti-viral activity. Mechanistically, FXa cleaves the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which prevents its binding to ACE2, and thus blocks viral entry. Furthermore, the variant B.1.1.7 with several mutations is dramatically resistant to the anti-viral effect of FXa compared to wild-type SARA-CoV-2 in vivo and in vitro. The anti-coagulant rivaroxaban directly inhibits FXa and facilitates viral entry, whereas the indirect inhibitor fondaparinux does not. In a lethal humanized hACE2 mouse model of SARS-CoV-2, FXa prolonged survival while combination with rivaroxaban but not fondaparinux abrogated this protection. These preclinical results identify a previously unknown SP function and associated anti-viral host defense mechanism and suggest caution in considering direct inhibitors for prevention or treatment of thrombotic complications in COVID-19 patients.

Targeting the Complement Serine Protease MASP-2 as a Therapeutic Strategy for Coronavirus Infections

MASP-2, mannose-binding protein-associated serine protease 2, is a key enzyme in the lectin pathway of complement activation. Hyperactivation of this protein by human coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 has been found to contribute to aberrant complement activation in patients, leading to aggravated lung injury with potentially fatal consequences. This hyperactivation is triggered in the lungs through a conserved, direct interaction between MASP-2 and coronavirus nucleocapsid (N) proteins. Blocking this interaction with monoclonal antibodies and interfering directly with the catalytic activity of MASP-2, have been found to alleviate coronavirus-induced lung injury both in vitro and in vivo. In this study, a virtual library of 8736 licensed drugs and clinical agents has been screened in silico according to two parallel strategies. The first strategy aims at identifying direct inhibitors of MASP-2 catalytic activity, while the second strategy focusses on finding protein-protein interaction inhibitors (PPIs) of MASP-2 and coronaviral N proteins. Such agents could represent promising support treatment options to prevent lung injury and reduce mortality rates of infections caused by both present and future-emerging coronaviruses. Forty-six drug repurposing candidates were purchased and, for the ones selected as potential direct inhibitors of MASP-2, a preliminary in vitro assay was conducted to assess their interference with the lectin pathway of complement activation. Some of the tested agents displayed a dose-response inhibitory activity of the lectin pathway, potentially providing the basis for a viable support strategy to prevent the severe complications of coronavirus infections.

Mechanisms of Resistance to KRASG12C Inhibitors

KRAS is one of the most common human oncogenes, but concerted efforts to produce direct inhibitors have largely failed, earning KRAS the title of “undruggable”. Recent efforts to produce subtype specific inhibitors have been more successful, and several KRASG12C inhibitors have reached clinical trials, including adagrasib and sotorasib, which have shown early evidence of efficacy in patients. Lessons from other inhibitors of the RAS pathway suggest that the effect of these drugs will be limited in vivo by the development of drug resistance, and pre-clinical studies of G12C inhibitors have identified evidence of this. In this review we discuss the current evidence for G12C inhibitors, the mechanisms of resistance to G12C inhibitors and potential approaches to overcome them. We discuss possible targets of combination therapy, including SHP2, receptor tyrosine kinases, downstream effectors and PD1/PDL1, and review the ongoing clinical trials investigating these inhibitors.

Enoyl-Acyl Carrier Protein Reductase (InhA): A REMARKABLE TARGET TO EXTERMINATE TUBERCULOSIS

: Tuberculosis, epidemic that needs new molecules with high potency and minimum side effects. In same respect, this review emphases on important target enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase or INHA crucial in completion of FAS II cycle. INHA retain its fame since inception of drug Isoniazid as inhibitors have long residence time hence good activity. One of the cause of failure of conventional drugs is resistance towards activating or target gene. Here, we propose direct inhibitors that doesn’t need prior activation by Kat G. Some of the categories are aryl amide, Piperazine, Thiadiazole, Benzamide etc. that are specifically active against INHA along with their Structure activity relationship. Many of them are efficient in micro molar concentration whereas Pyrazole carboxamide are active in nano molar concentration and derivative of 4-hydroxy pyridones was effective in vivo. Natural products are also in way to combat tuberculosis. Furthermore, from available proteins of wild and mutant strains new leads can be designed sucessfully by utilizing information of cocrystallized ligand.

Role of the KEAP1-NRF2 Axis in Renal Cell Carcinoma

NRF2 is a transcription factor that coordinates the antioxidant response in many different tissues, ensuring cytoprotection from endogenous and exogenous stress stimuli. In the kidney, its function is essential in appropriate cellular response to oxidative stress, however its aberrant activation supports progression, metastasis, and resistance to therapies in renal cell carcinoma, similarly to what happens in other nonrenal cancers. While at the moment direct inhibitors of NRF2 are not available, understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate its hyperactivation in specific tumor types is crucial as it may open new therapeutic perspectives. Here, we focus our attention on renal cell carcinoma, describing how NRF2 hyperactivation can contribute to tumor progression and chemoresistance. Furthermore, we highlight the mechanism whereby the many pathways that are generally altered in these tumors converge to dysregulation of the KEAP1-NRF2 axis.

The activation of procarcinogens by CYP1A1/1B1 and related chemopreventive agents: A review

: CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 are extrahepatic P450 family members involved in the metabolism of procarcinogens, such as PAHs, heterocyclic amines and halogen-containing organic compounds. CYP1A1/1B1 also participate in the metabolism of endogenous 17-β-estradiol, producing estradiol hydroquinones which are the intermediates of carcinogenic semiquinones and quinones. CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 proteins share approximately half amino acid sequence identity but differ in crystal structures. As a result, CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 have different substrate specificity to chemical procarcinogens. This review will introduce the general molecular biology knowledge of CYP1A1/1B1 and the metabolic processes of procarcinogens regulated by these two enzymes. Over the last four decades, a variety of natural products and synthetic compounds which interact with CYP1A1/1B1 have been identified as effective chemo-preventive agents against chemical carcinogenesis. These compounds are mainly classified as, indirect or direct CYP1A1/1B1 inhibitors based on their distinct mechanisms. Indirect CYP1A1/1B1 inhibitors generally impede the transcription and translation of CYP1A1/1B1 genes or interfere the translocation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) from the cytosolic domain to the nucleus. On the other hand, direct inhibitors inhibit the catalytic activities of CYP1A1/1B1. Based on the structural features, the indirect inhibitors can be categorized into the following groups: flavonoids, alkaloids and synthetic aromatics whereas the direct inhibitors can be categorized into flavonoids, coumarins, stilbenes, sulfur containing isothiocyanates and synthetic aromatics. This review will summarize the in vitro and in vivo activities of these chemo-preventive agents, their working mechanisms, and related SARs. This will provide a better understanding of the molecular mechanism of CYP1 mediated carcinogenesis and will also give great implications for the discovery of novel chemo-preventive agents in the near future.

AT101 [(-)-Gossypol] Selectively Inhibits MCL1 and Sensitizes Carcinoma to BH3 Mimetics by Inducing and Stabilizing NOXA

Anti-apoptotic BCL2 proteins are important targets for cancer therapy as cancers depend on their activity for survival. Direct inhibitors of MCL1 have entered clinical trials, although their efficacy may be limited by toxicity. An alternative approach may be to induce the pro-apoptotic protein NOXA which selectively inhibits MCL1 in cells. Many compounds originally proposed as inhibitors of the BCL2 family were subsequently found to induce the pro-apoptotic protein NOXA through the unfolded protein response. In the present study, we compared various putative BH3 mimetics across a panel of carcinoma cell lines and measured expression of NOXA protein and mRNA, as well as the kinetics of NOXA induction. We found that AT101 [(-)-gossypol] induces high levels of NOXA in carcinoma cell lines yet cells survive. When combined with an appropriate BCL2 or BCL-XL inhibitor, NOXA-dependent sensitization occurs. NOXA protein continues to accumulate for many hours after AT101 is removed, providing a window for administering these combinations. As MCL1 promotes drug resistance and overall survival, we propose that NOXA induction is an alternative therapeutic strategy to target MCL1 and either kill cancer cells that are dependent on MCL1 or sensitize cancer cells to other BCL2 inhibitors.

Clinical characteristics and anti-PD-(L)1 treatment outcomes of KRAS-G12C mutant lung cancer compared to other molecular subtypes of KRAS-mutant lung cancer.

9596 Background: KRAS mutations are identified in approximately 30% of NSCLC. There are no FDA approved targeted therapies for patients with KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but novel direct inhibitors of KRAS G12C have shown some activity in early phase clinical trials. We hypothesized that patients with KRAS-G12C mutations may have distinct clinical characteristics and responses to systemic therapies compared to patients with non-G12C subtypes. Methods: We identified patients with KRAS-mutant lung cancers who underwent next-generation sequencing with MSK-IMPACT, between January 2014 and December 2018. Baseline characteristics were compared with the Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test for categorical data and Wilcoxon rank-rum test for continuous data. Overall survival was calculated from time of diagnosis of metastatic/recurrent disease to date of death or last follow up, with left truncation to account for time of MSK-IMPACT. Overall survival was compared between groups using the Cox proportional-hazards model. Response evaluations where performed by independent thoracic radiologists according to RECIST 1. and compared between group with the Fisher’s exact test. Results: We identified 1194 patients with KRAS -mutant NSCLC, 772 with recurrent or metastatic disease. Of patients with advanced disease, 46% (352/772) had mutations in KRAS-G12C and 54% harbored non-G12C mutations (15% G12D, 16% G12V, 8% G12A, 4% G13D). Co-mutation patterns were similar with respect to KEAP1 (p=0.9) and STK11 (p=1.0). Patients with non-G12C mutations had a higher proportion of never smokers (10% vs 1.4% p<0.001). The median OS from diagnosis was 13 months for G12C and non-G12C patients (p=0.99). 45% (347/772) received 1L or 2L line treatment with PD-(L)1 inhibitor. RECIST measurements were available for 290/347 cases (84%). ORR with anti-PD-(L)1 treatment was 24% vs 28% in G12C vs non-G12C patients (p=0.5). In patients with PD-L1 50% (n=103), ORR was 39% for G12C vs 58% non-G12C patients (p=0.06). Conclusions: KRAS G12C mutations are present in 12% of patients with NSCLC and represent a relevant subtype of NSCLC given KRAS G12C inhibitors now in clinical development. Baseline characteristics including co-mutation patterns are similar between patients with G12C and non-G12C, except for smoking history. The efficacy of KRAS G12C direct inhibitors will need to be compared to other available therapies for KRAS mutant NSCLC (chemotherapy and PD-(L)1 inhibitors) to identify most effective therapeutic strategy.