Carotid Interventions for Women: The Hazards and Benefits

The goal of the current review is to examine the hazards and benefits of carotid interventions in women and to provide recommendations for the indications for carotid intervention in female patients. Stroke and cerebrovascular disease are prevalent in women. There are inherent biological and other differences in men and women, which affect the manifestations and outcome of stroke, with women experiencing worse disability and higher mortality following ischemic stroke than men. Due to the underrepresentation of female patients in most clinical trials, the ability to make firm but alternative recommendations for women specifically on the management of carotid stenosis is challenging. Although some data suggest that women might have worse periprocedural outcomes as compared to men following all carotid revascularization procedures, there is also an abundance of data to support a similar risk for carotid procedures in men and women, especially with carotid endarterectomy and transcarotid artery revascularization. Therefore, the indications for carotid revascularization are the same in women as they are in men. The choice of a carotid revascularization procedure in women is based upon the same factors as in men and requires careful evaluation of a particular patient’s risk profile, anatomic criteria, plaque morphology, and medical comorbidities that might favor one technique over the other. When performing carotid revascularization procedures in women, tailored techniques and procedures to address the small diameter of the female artery are warranted.

Patient-Telemonitoring After Revascularization Procedures in the Lower Extremities

Multidisciplinary cooperation of participating healthcare professionals, use of common standards in diagnostics, and clinical pathways in the treatment of vascular patients should provide for a higher-quality clinical practice. Using telemedicine, a more efficient way of obtaining specialist treatment is achievable. However, its introduction may raise safety and security issues, which originate from its enabling information technology. In this chapter, a model of patient-telemonitoring after revascularization procedures in the lower extremities is presented. A protocol for proper authentication and authorization to access medical equipment and patient medical records has been introduced. The associated clinical study has shown that most post-operative follow-up examinations can successfully be performed by trained nurses. Hence, improvements to healthcare logistics, mainly due to shortening waiting times for specialist treatment and the reduction of follow-up examinations on the secondary healthcare level, can be achieved using telemedicine.

Treatment of Unique Bilateral Distal Fusiform Superior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysms with Mini-Flow Diverter Device Implantation: Case Report

Currently, surgical revascularization procedures using intracranial–intracranial (IC-IC) or extracranial–intracranial (EC-IC) bypass and distal clipping or trapping are the valid and rescue treatment modality for extremely rare unilateral distal fusiform superior cerebellar artery (SCA) aneurysms. Yet, in case of bilateral fusiform SCA aneurysms, surgical therapy reaches its limit. Mini-flow diverter devices (FDDs) have only recently become available for treating fusiform aneurysms of such small vessels. We report the unique case of bilateral distal fusiform SCA aneurysms in a 43-year-old man with subarachnoid hemorrhage (Fisher grade IV and World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies [WFNS] grade II) treated with endovascular implantation of bilateral mini-FDDs with excellent outcome and no radiographic signs of infarction. Yet, occlusion of one of the FDDs was found in the follow-up, which again shows the eminent danger of occlusion in case of an implantation of FDDs in such small-caliber vessels, which leaves the discussion about the optimal therapy method open.

In-Hospital Outcomes of Urgent, Early, or Late Revascularization for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis

Background and Purpose: Advancements in carotid revascularization have produced promising outcomes in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. However, the optimal timing of revascularization procedures after symptomatic presentation remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to compare in-hospital outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), transfemoral carotid stenting (TFCAS), or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed within different time intervals after most recent symptoms. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of United States patients in the vascular quality initiative. All carotid revascularizations performed for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis between September 2016 and November 2019 were included. Procedures were categorized as urgent (0–2 days after most recent symptom), early (3–14 days), or late (15–180 days). The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital stroke and death. Secondary outcomes include in-hospital stroke, death, and transient ischemic attacks. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare outcomes. Results: A total of 18 643 revascularizations were included: 2006 (10.8%) urgent, 7423 (39.8%) early, and 9214 (49.42%) late. Patients with TFCAS had the highest rates of stroke/death at all timing cohorts (urgent: 4.0% CEA, 6.9% TFCAS, 6.5% TCAR, P =0.018; early: 2.5% CEA, 3.8% TFCAS, 2.9% TCAR, P =0.054; late: 1.6% CEA, 2.8% TFCAS, 2.3% TCAR, P =0.003). TFCAS also had increased odds of in-hospital stroke/death compared with CEA in all 3 groups (urgent adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.7 [95% CI, 1.0–2.9] P =0.03; early aOR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1–2.4] P =0.01; and late aOR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.2–3.0] P =0.01). TCAR and CEA had comparable odds of in-hospital stroke/death in all 3 groups (urgent aOR, 1.9 [95% CI, 0.9–4], P =0.10), (early aOR, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.7–1.7], P =0.66), (late aOR, 1.5 [95% CI, 0.9–2.3], P =0.08). Conclusions: CEA remains the safest method of revascularization within the urgent period. Among revascularization performed outside of the 48 hours, TCAR and CEA have comparable outcomes.

Calcium Score Predicts Mortality After Revascularization in Critical Limb Ischemia

Purpose: The calcium score is a measure of vessel wall calcification and has clinical applications when studied in different vascular beds. The presence of vascular calcification in the arteries of the lower limbs is very common in patients with peripheral arterial disease; however, its relationship with the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lower limb revascularization is still poorly studied. The aim of this study is to evaluate association between the calcium score of lower limbs and the postoperative outcomes in patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing revascularization procedures. Methodology: We retrospectively analyzed 88 lower limb revascularization procedures in 72 patients with critical limb ischemia who had enhanced computed tomography for preoperative evaluation. The calcium score was calculated, from the angiographic phase of preoperative computed tomography, in the segments of the aorta, iliac, femoropopliteal, and infrapopliteal. It was also calculated the calcium score of the operated limb, and the total calcium score using a standardized method. The outcomes evaluated were the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction, amputation, patency, technical success, and death from any cause. Patients were followed up through a 12 month period. Results: Among the 88 procedures performed, 31 (43.1%) lesions were classified as Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document II D. There were 66 (75%) endovascular procedures, 16 (18.2%) open surgery, and 6 (6.8%) hybrid interventions. No statistically significant relationship was found between the calcium score of the segments (aorta, iliac, femoropopliteal, infrapopliteal, the operated limb, and total calcium score) and the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction, amputation, patency, and technical success in any of the periods analyzed. The calcium score of the operated limb was higher in patients who died within 30 days and 6 months (6571 vs 2590.6; p=0.026) and (5227.8 vs 2335.3; p=0.036). Conclusion: A standardized calcium score calculation method with the angiographic phase of the computed tomography is feasible and reproducible. Higher values of the calcifications of the operated limb are related to a greater chance of death in the postoperative period. The calcium score of the operated limb can be considered as a marker of clinical severity and prognosis in this group of patients

An Observational Study on Patients with Acute Limb Ischemia and SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Early and Late Results in Limb Salvage Rate

An observational study on 22 patients presenting with acute limb ischemia and SARS-CoV-2 infection, and without any other embolic risk factors, was performed. All patients were classified according to Rutherford classification for acute limb ischemia. The primary goal of this study was to assess the risk of amputation in these patients after revascularization procedures. The secondary goal was to find the correlation between acute limb ischemia (ALI) severity, patient comorbidities, risk of death, and the association of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The patients were treated by open surgery (18 patients—81.81%) or by the means of endovascular techniques (four patients—18.18%). The amputation-free survival rate was 81.81% in hospital and 86.36% at 1-month follow-up. In this study, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 infection did not influence the amputation-free survival rate: it was only the risk factor for the arterial thrombosis and the trigger for the acute ischemic event. The application of the standard treatment—open surgery or endovascular revascularization—in patients with acute limb ischemia and SARS-CoV-2 infection represents the key to success for lower limb salvage.

Cell Viability Assessment Using Fluorescence Vital Dyes and Confocal Microscopy in Evaluating Freezing and Thawing Protocols Used in Cryopreservation of Allogeneic Venous Grafts

The authors present their contribution to the improvement of methods suitable for the detection of the freezing and thawing damage of cells of cryopreserved venous grafts used for lower limb revascularization procedures. They studied the post-thaw viability of cells of the wall of cryopreserved venous grafts (CVG) immediately after thawing and after 24 and 48 h culture at +37 °C in two groups of six CVG selected randomly for slow thawing in the refrigerator and rapid thawing in a water bath at +37 °C. The grafts were collected from multi-organ and tissue brain-dead donors, cryopreserved, and stored in a liquid nitrogen vapor phase for five years. The viability was assessed from tissue slices obtained by perpendicular and longitudinal cuts of the thawed graft samples using in situ staining with fluorescence vital dyes. The mean and median immediate post-thaw viability values above 70% were found in using both thawing protocols and both types of cutting. The statistically significant decline in viability after the 48-h culture was observed only when using the slow thawing protocol and perpendicular cutting. The possible explanation might be the “solution effect damage” during slow thawing, which caused a gentle reduction in the graft cellularity. The possible influence of this phenomenon on the immunogenicity of CVG should be the subject of further investigations.