bereavement support
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

289
(FIVE YEARS 73)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2022 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-41
Author(s):  
Sarah Mullally
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
Sarah Mullally

2022 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-23
Author(s):  
Alyssa E. Erikson ◽  
Kathleen A. Puntillo ◽  
Jennifer L. McAdam

Background Losing a loved one in the intensive care unit is associated with complicated grief and increased psychologic distress for families. Providing bereavement support may help families during this time. However, little is known about the bereavement experiences of families of patients in the cardiac intensive care unit. Objective To describe the bereavement experiences of families of patients in the cardiac intensive care unit. Methods In this secondary analysis, an exploratory, descriptive design was used to understand the families’ bereavement experiences. Families from 1 cardiac intensive care unit in a tertiary medical center in the western United States participated. Audiotaped telephone interviews were conducted by using a semistructured interview guide 13 to 15 months after the patient’s death. A qualitative, descriptive technique was used for data analysis. Two independent researchers coded the interview transcripts and identified themes. Results Twelve family members were interviewed. The majority were female (n = 8, 67%), spouses (n = 10, 83%), and White (n = 10, 83%); the mean age (SD) was 58.4 (16.7) years. Five main themes emerged: (1) families’ bereavement work included both practical tasks and emotional processing; (2) families’ bereavement experiences were individual; (3) these families were resilient and found their own resources and coping mechanisms; (4) the suddenness of a patient’s death influenced families’ bereavement experiences; and (5) families’ experiences in the intensive care unit affected their bereavement. Conclusions This study provided insight into the bereavement experiences of families of patients in the cardiac intensive care unit. These findings may be useful for professionals working with bereaved families and for cardiac intensive care units considering adding bereavement support.


Author(s):  
Madelena Arnone ◽  
Lynn Grandmaison Dumond ◽  
Nahal Yazdani ◽  
Rayan El-Baroudi ◽  
Annie Pouliot ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 571-571
Author(s):  
Todd Becker ◽  
John Cagle

Abstract Although the Medicare Hospice Benefit mandates that hospices provide bereavement services to families for 1 year following death, it does not stipulate what services should be offered or how. Thus, this study aimed to explore the range of hospice bereavement services. This study stems from Cagle et al.’s (2020) prior study surveying 600 randomly selected agencies, stratified by state and profit status. Most participants (N = 76) worked as clinical supervisors or directors of patient services (41.6%) for medium-sized (53.2%), for-profit hospices (50.6%). Responses to “What types of bereavement support does your hospice provide to families?” were content analyzed. Analyst triangulation and peer debriefing enhanced trustworthiness. Four domains emerged: timing of support, providers of support, targets of support, and formats of support. Each domain reflected substantial variability. All hospices offered postdeath bereavement support. A minority described offering predeath support, often through bereavement risk assessment and supportive services targeting those at risk. Providers frequently included trained bereavement counselors, social workers, and chaplains. Less often, hospices leveraged familiar members of the decedents’ care team to encourage family participation. Although bereavement services predominantly targeted surviving adult family members of deceased hospice patients, services tailored to children and hospice-unaffiliated community members also emerged. The format of bereavement services demonstrated the widest variability. Commonly reported formats included written materials, support groups, and phone calls. Most hospices employed multiple formats. Although findings are consistent with prior research, the variability in each domain complicates rigorous investigation of which aspects offer the greatest benefit to bereaved family members.


2021 ◽  
pp. 127-145
Author(s):  
Aimee Aubeeluck ◽  
Elaine Duro
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 105413732110440
Author(s):  
Karen West ◽  
Hannah Rumble ◽  
Rachel Shaw ◽  
Ailsa Cameron ◽  
Caity Roleston

COVID-19 lockdown and social distancing measures have restricted funerals and memorial events and have limited the face-to-face social networks that grieving people might normally be able to draw upon for emotional support. However, while there is considerable expert informed speculation about the impacts of grief and “COVID bereavement”, detailed accounts of experiences of bereavement and bereavement support during the pandemic have the potential to enrich and provide nuance and subtlety to the evidence base. This paper draws on diary accounts of bereavement support volunteers in the UK, who have been providing support for the bereaved through these challenging times. These reveal layers of complexity to the experiences of loss, grief and bereavement during these extraordinary times. However, they also point to a number of additional themes that lend a more positive valence to the suspension of normal social expectations and memorial practices associated with the pandemic, which, we argue should be reflected upon for their potential to address the discontents of contemporary governance of end of life and bereavement.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 419-425
Author(s):  
Carolina D. Tennyson ◽  
John P. Oliver ◽  
Karen R. Jooste

Background Family presence during resuscitation is the compassionate practice of allowing a patient’s family to witness treatment for cardiac or respiratory arrest (code blue event) when appropriate. Offering family presence during resuscitation as an interprofessional practice is consistent with patient- and family-centered care. In many institutions, the role of family facilitator is not formalized and may be performed by various staff members. At the large academic institution of this study, the family facilitator is a member of the chaplain staff. Objectives To examine the frequency of family presence during code blue events and describe the role of chaplains as family facilitators. Methods Chaplain staff documented information about their code responses daily from January 2012 through April 2020. They documented their response time, occurrence of patient death, presence of family at the event, and services they provided. A retrospective data review was performed. Results Chaplains responded to 1971 code blue pages during this time frame. Family members were present at 53% of code blue events. Chaplains provided multiple services, including crisis support, compassionate presence, spiritual care, bereavement support, staff debriefing, and prayer with and for patients, families, and staff. Conclusions Family members are frequently present during code blue events. Chaplains are available to respond to all such events and provide a variety of immediate and longitudinal services to patients, families, and members of the health care team. Their experience in crisis management, spiritual care, and bereavement support makes them ideally suited to serve as family facilitators during resuscitation events.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chanelle Wilson ◽  
Louise McKay ◽  
Rachael Marchant ◽  
Michael Irlam ◽  
Emma Hamilton
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document