IMPACT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY PROCEDURES

Background- COVID-19, an emerging coronavirus disease is a major health problem. It has markedly affected the routine medical procedures including Gastrointestinal(GI) endoscopies. Inspite of guidelines suggested by various GI societies,for safe GI endoscopy procedures in period of COVID pandemic, most of the endoscopists as well as the patients were hesitant for the endoscopy procedures.We sought to measure the impact of the same on GI endoscopy activity in Pune. Method- A pre-validated questionnaire containing 28 questions was sent across to the GI endoscopy surgeons. Responses were collected to assess the perception of GI endoscopists regarding the practice of endoscopy and the risk of self-contamination during COVID-19 Pandemic. This data was analysed using appropriate statistical applications. Result-51 GI endoscopists from Pune participated in our study out of which 80.3% (41/51) were involved in the management of COVID-19 patients outside the endoscopy department. During the study period, 86.28% (44/51) of endoscopists had to cancel procedures on grounds of COVID19 pandemic.Symptoms compatible with COVID-19 infection were reported by 29.41% (15/51) of the endoscopists out of which 13 (86%) responders had a positive RTPCR test for COVID-19 Conclusion- COVID-19 pandemic has seriously affected GI endoscopy practice. COVID 19 infection rate was also remarkable in endoscopists and endoscopy staff. As the screening of patients with GI problems was hampered, there was definitive delay in diagnosis and treatment. Nevertheless, endoscopy centers should adapt and make changes in their practice to face future pandemic, emphasizing safety of staff without delaying patient care.

Epidemiology, Clinical Features, and Prescribing Patterns of Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Taiwan

Background: Understanding the prescribing patterns could better inform irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) management and health policy. However, there is no study on prescribing patterns of IBS in Taiwan. This study was conducted to evaluate the epidemiology, clinical features, and prescribing patterns of IBS in Taiwan.Methods: This population-based cross-sectional study was performed by retrieving claim data from National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) between 2011 and 2018 in Taiwan. Patients who were diagnosed with IBS during 2012–2018 and more than 20 years old were included. The annual incidence and prevalence of IBS were estimated. The characteristics and prescribing pattern were evaluated among IBS population. The population with IBS were followed from index date until 1 year after or death.Results: A total of 1691596 patients diagnosed with IBS were identified from 2012 to 2018. The average annual incidence and prevalence of IBS in Taiwan were calculated as 106.54 and 181.75 per 10,000 population. The incidence and prevalence showed a decreasing trend from 2012 to 2018. Hypertension, dyslipidemia, chronic liver disease, peptic ulcer, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), anxiety, and sleep disorder were the prevalent comorbidities in IBS population. At 1 year after IBS diagnosis, the rates of peptic ulcer and GERD; the utilizations of abdominal ultrasonography, upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, and lower GI endoscopy; the prescribing rate of propulsives, simethicone, antacids, H2-blockers, and proton pump inhibitors significantly increased. Approximately 70% of participants received IBS-related treatment. Antispasmodics was the most frequently prescribed medication class, followed by laxatives and antidiarrheals. Only 48.58% of patients made return visit for IBS at 1 year after IBS diagnosis. Consequently, the proportion of consultation for IBS and the prescribing rates of all medications were decreased considerably after IBS diagnosis.Conclusion: The incidence and prevalence of IBS showed a decreasing trend from 2012 to 2018. More than two-third of patients received treatment for IBS. Antispasmodics was widely used for IBS management. However, patients may have a short symptom duration or receive a short course of IBS-related treatment in Taiwan. These findings provided the whole picture of the epidemiology and prescribing pattern of the IBS population in Taiwan.

A Questionnaire-Based Survey on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Asia

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The COVID-19 outbreak abruptly restricted gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy services during the first wave of the pandemic. We aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the practice of GI endoscopy in Asian countries. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was an International Questionnaire-based Internet Survey conducted at multiple facilities by the International Gastrointestinal Consensus Symposium. A total of 166 respondents in Japan, China, Hong Kong, South Korea, Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia, and Singapore participated in this study. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The volume of endoscopic screening or follow-up endoscopies and therapeutic endoscopies were markedly reduced during the first wave of the pandemic, which was mainly attributed to the decreased number of outpatients, cancellations by patients, and adherence to the guidelines of academic societies. The most common indications for GI endoscopy during the first wave were GI bleeding, cholangitis or obstructive jaundice, and a highly suspicious case of neoplasia. The most common GI symptoms of COVID-19 patients during the infected period included diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. The pandemic exacerbated some GI diseases, such as functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. There were cases with delayed diagnosis of cancers due to postponed endoscopic procedures, and the prescription of proton pump inhibitors/potassium-competitive acid blockers, steroids, immunosuppressive agents, and biologics was delayed or canceled. The personal protective equipment used during endoscopic procedures for high-risk patients were disposable gloves, disposable gowns, N95 or equivalent masks, and face shields. However, the devices on the patient side during endoscopic procedures included modified surgical masks, mouthpieces with filters, and disposable vinyl boxes or aerosol boxes covering the head. Furthermore, the time for education, basic research, clinical research, and daily clinical practice decreased during the first wave. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic profoundly affected the method of performing GI endoscopy and medical treatment for patients with GI diseases in Asian countries.

The child’s perception on monitoring inflammatory bowel disease activity

To determine the perception of children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) regarding monitoring tests, we first compared the reported discomfort and patient perspective during gastro-intestinal (GI)-endoscopy, magnetic resonance entrography (MRE), and ultrasound (US) and, in a second comparison, patient preference on non-invasive tests (venipuncture, sampling stool and US). A cross-sectional study in children 8–18 years undergoing an US, MRE, and GI-endoscopy for diagnosis or follow-up of IBD. After each procedure, the children filled out the Discomfort during research procedures questionnaire (DISCO-RC). Items of the DISCO-RC are as follows: nervousness, annoyance, pain, fright, boredom, and tiredness. Answers range from “not” (= 0 points) to “extremely” (= 4 points) (range total score: 0–24). Differences between the procedures were assessed with Friedman test, with subsequent Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The children were also asked which non-invasive test they preferred not to undergo regularly (venipuncture, stool-sampling, or US). Answers were analyzed with χ2-test. Forty-nine patients (27 (55%) female, median age 15 (range 9–17)) were included. The children reported to be most nervous, frightened, and tired after GI-endoscopy (median: 1, 1, 2 points, respectively), equally annoyed by MRE and GI-endoscopy (median 1 point), and equally bored by MRE and US. GI-endoscopy was ranked as most discomfortable, followed by MRE and US (total DISCO-RC scores: 7 vs. 5 vs. 2, p < 0.001). Most of the children preferred not to sample stool or perform venipuncture regularly (n = 20 (41%, both) (p < 0.001)).Conclusion: Our results suggest that the children with IBD report low discomfort after US, MRE, and GI-endoscopy. US is preferred as a monitoring tool, also among non-invasive monitoring tests. GI-endoscopy was most discomfortable. What is Known:• Children with inflammatory bowel disease need to be monitored frequently for disease activity.• Adult studies — including a systematic review — on acceptability of monitoring tools among IBD patients showed mixed results. What is New:• Children in our study ranked gastro-intestinal endoscopy as most discomfortable, followed by MRE and US.• With regard to non-invasive monitoring, most children preferred not to sample stool or perform venipuncture regularly, and preferred US.

Correlation between Serum-Ascites Albumin Gradient and Esophageal Varices in Portal Hypertension due to Cirrhosis of Liver

Introduction: Cirrhosis of the liver is a major health problem in our country. Patients with cirrhosis are at risk of developing esophageal varices and variceal bleeding with high mortality. They must undergo routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to screen for the presence of varices. This poses an economic, social, and medical burden. Thus, this warrants a non-invasive predictor of esophageal varices in a cirrhotic patient. The aim of this study was to find the correlation between SAAG and esophageal varices in portal hypertension due to cirrhosis of liver. Methods: Patients (45 males and 35 females) above 18 years of age and with cirrhosis of the liver underwent cross sectional observational study at Nepal Medical College Teaching hospital between October 2015 and December 2017 AD. Serum albumin and ascitic fluid albumin were analyzed on the same day and serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) was calculated. Upper GI endoscopy was done to evaluate for the presence of esophageal and gastric varices. Pearson's chi-square test was applied to see the relation between SAAG and esophageal varices. Results: Among the 80 patients studied, 56.2% were male and 93.75% had varices. Majority of the patients who had esophageal varices had SAAG of more than 1.1 g/dL. A positive correlation was found between serum-ascites-albumin gradient and esophageal varices but was statistically not significant. A cut-off of >1.6 for SAAG to discriminate between presence and absence of varices yielded a sensitivity of 78.66% and a positive predictive value of 92.18%. Conclusion: This study highlighted that SAAG has a positive correlation with esophageal varices with high sensitivity and positive predictive value in estimating the presence of varices but without statistical significance. It has a low specificity. Due to statistically insignificant correlation and low specificity, SAAG cannot be used in place of upper GI endoscopy in diagnosing gastroesophageal varices

A Case of Esophageal Squamous Papilloma, an Unusual Cause of Dysphagia and Hematemesis in a Patient with Concurrent Malignancies

Introduction: The oesophageal squamous papilloma (ESP) is a rare cause of dysphagia and hematemesis. The malignant potential of this lesion is uncertain; however, the malignant transformation and concurrent malignancies have been reported in the literature. Case description: We report a case of oesophageal squamous papilloma in a 43-year-old female who had a background diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer and liposarcoma of the left knee. She presented with dysphagia. Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy showed a polypoid growth, and its biopsy confirmed the diagnosis. Meanwhile, she presented again with hematemesis. A repeat endoscopy showed that the previously seen lesion had likely broken off, leaving behind a residual stalk. This was snared and removed. The patient remained asymptomatic, and a follow-up upper GI endoscopy at six months did not show any recurrence. Practical implications: To our knowledge, this is the first case of ESP in a patient with two concurrent malignancies. Moreover, the diagnosis of ESP should also be considered when presenting with dysphagia or hematemesis.