vaccine clinical trial
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

60
(FIVE YEARS 21)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 3)

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1103
Author(s):  
Joana Silva Marques ◽  
Marta Bodro ◽  
Berta Torres ◽  
Felipe García ◽  
José Antonio Martínez ◽  
...  

We report a case of Mycobacterium malmoense pulmonary infection and HIV-1 chronic co-infection in a 60-year-old man while participating in an HIV-1 therapeutic vaccine clinical trial and during the analytical treatment interruption. We present clinical and therapeutic features of a complicated M. malmoense pulmonary infection along with discussion of the possible relation to the HIV-1 cure-related interventions.


Author(s):  
Tam Hunt ◽  
Blaine Williams ◽  
Daniel Howard

Widespread screening of asymptomatic people leads to high numbers of false positives when background prevalence is low, even with accurate tests. During the Covid-19 pandemic, not only has the background prevalence been low (vaccine clinical trial baseline testing finds 0.5-0.6% even during periods of higher prevalence), but the various COVID-19 tests are not very accurate. When inaccurate tests are combined with a low background prevalence, this results in a massive and unacknowledged problem of far more false positive test results than true positive test results, leading also to inaccurate characterization of COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amandine Gagneux-Brunon ◽  
Emilie Guyot ◽  
Maelle Detoc ◽  
Elisabeth Botelho-Nevers ◽  
Tiphaine Barjat

Introduction: Pregnant women are frequently excluded from clinical trials. Yet, inclusion of pregnant women is of interest in vaccinology including during health crisis. Promotion of clinical trials by midwives may facilitate the decision making of pregnant women. Attitudes of midwives about participation in a vaccine clinical trial have been little explored. Methods: We conducted an anonymous survey from the 11th of September to the 11th of November 2020. Primary endpoint was the willingness to encourage pregnant women to participate in a hypothetical respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine clinical trial. Results: Among 398 midwives who answered the questionnaire, 113 (28.3 %) were likely to encourage pregnant women to participate in the vaccine clinical trial, this proportion ranged from 25 % in senior midwives to 34.5 % among the students. After adjustment on age, parenthood, previous vaccine hesitancy attitudes, and the 5 components of the 5C model, the only predictor of the promotion of the clinical trial was the training score with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.09 (1.01-1.18, p=0.027) for a one-point increase. Vaccine hesitancy and psychological antecedents of vaccinations were not associated with a lower promotion of pregnant women trial participation among midwives. Conclusion: Few respondents were likely to encourage pregnant women to participate in a vaccine clinical trial. Midwives who considered having a good training about vaccines were more prone to encourage pregnant women to participate in a RSV vaccine clinical trial.


Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011881
Author(s):  
Alejandra M Márquez Loza ◽  
Kathryn B. Holroyd ◽  
Stephen A. Johnson ◽  
David M Pilgrim ◽  
Anthony A. Amato

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document