Protection by Ankle Brace for Lower-Extremity Joints in Half-Squat Parachuting Landing With a Backpack

Half-squat parachuting landing is a kind of activity with high impact force. Injuries on lower-extremity joints are common in half-squat parachuting landing and would be increased with a backpack. An ankle brace was used to prevent ankle injuries in landing. However, few quantitative studies reported about the protection of an ankle brace for lower-extremity joints in half-squat parachuting landing with a backpack. This study focused on evaluating the protective effects of an ankle brace in half-squat parachuting landing with a backpack. Seven male participants landed from 120 cm with a backpack and an ankle brace. Each participant performed three landing trials on every experimental condition. Kinetics and kinematics of the hip, knee, and ankle were analyzed. It was found that the ankle brace did not significantly affect the ground reaction force with backpack but increased the ground reaction force from 14.7 ± 2.0 bodyweight to 16.2 ± 1.9 bodyweight (p = 0.017) without the backpack. The ankle brace significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the angular displacement, angular velocity, and angular acceleration of the ankle both without and with the backpack. In conclusion, the ankle brace could restrict ankle motion and significantly increase ground reaction force without the backpack. However, the ankle brace did not significantly influence ground reaction force and still restricted ankle motion with the backpack. Therefore, the ankle brace was more effective in half-squat parachuting landing with the backpack than no-backpack landing.

The Fifth Metatarsal Shaft Fracture Is Well Treated With Benign Neglect

Background. Spiral fifth metatarsal fractures have been studied previously in professional dancers. However, little has been reported about outcomes of these injuries in the general population. The objective of this study was to examine patient demographics of those who sustain this injury and their functional outcomes, as stratified by treatment type. Methods. A total of 186 “nonprofessional dancer” patients with a fifth metatarsal fracture who were treated by one orthopaedic surgeon at our academic medical center were identified through chart review. All patients were allowed to weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT). Time to healing, persistence of pain, range of motion, and complications were recorded. Independent samples t tests, 1-way analysis of variance, and Fisher exact tests were used for analysis. Results. Thirty-seven of the 186 patients with fifth metatarsal fractures reviewed were identified as having a spiral fifth metatarsal fracture with appropriate follow-up. The cohort was 78.4% female with a mean age of 50.3 years. Twenty-two were initially treated in a controlled ankle motion (CAM) boot, 14 in a postoperative shoe, and 1 continued in their own shoes. All patients were allowed to WBAT. All fractures healed by a mean of 3.1 months. By the end of the follow-up period, 67.6% of patients had full range of ankle motion, with 5.4% reporting feeling stiff, 27.0% reporting mild persistent pain, and 2.7% reporting significant persistent pain. Conclusion. Fifth metatarsal shaft (“Dancer’s”) fractures occur within the general population, not only among professional dancers. Without operative fixation and regardless of nonoperative treatment selected, these fractures heal reliably and do so without clinically relevant complication. Level of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective comparative study

Instrumented gait analysis defines the walking signature of CACNA1A disorders

Background Gait disturbances are a frequent symptom in CACNA1A disorders. Even though, data about their severity and progression are lacking and no CACNA1A-specific scale or assessment for gait is available. Methods We applied a gait assessment protocol in 20 ambulatory patients with genetically confirmed CACNA1A disorders and 39 matched healthy controls. An instrumented gait analysis (IGA) was performed by means of wearable sensors in basal condition and after a treadmill/cycloergometer challenge in selected cases. Results CACNA1A patients displayed lower gait speed, shorter steps with increased step length variability, a reduced landing acceleration as well as a reduced range of ankle motion compared to controls. Furthermore, gait-width in patients with episodic CACNA1A disorders was narrower as compared to controls. In one patient experiencing mild episodic symptoms after the treadmill challenge, the IGA was able to detect a deterioration over all gait parameters. Conclusions In CACNA1A patients, the IGA with wearable sensors unravels specific gait signatures which are not detectable at naked eye. These features (narrow-based gait, lower landing acceleration) distinguish these patients from other ataxic disorders and may be target of focused rehabilitative interventions. IGA can potentially be applied to monitor the neurological fluctuations associated with CACNA1A disorders.

Preoperative Gait Analysis of Peroneal Tendon Tears

Background: Little is known regarding the impact of peroneal tendon tears on function. This study quantifies gait changes associated with operatively-confirmed peroneal tendon tears. Methods: Sixty-five patients with unilateral peroneal tendon tears were prospectively evaluated using preoperative 3D multisegment gait analysis of both limbs. Data were analyzed according to pattern/severity of tears, as confirmed surgically: peroneus brevis tears, reparable (PBR); peroneus brevis tears, irreparable (PBI); peroneus longus tears, irreparable (PLI); and concomitant irreparable tears of both tendons (PBI+PLI). The following parameters were analyzed: ankle sagittal motion, coronal motion, axial rotation, foot progression angle, sagittal power, sagittal moment. Results: Twelve patients (18.5%) had the PBR pattern, 37 (56.9%) PBI, 10 (15.4%) PLI, and 6 (9.2%) PBI+PLI. Compared with the contralateral, nonpathologic extremities, limbs with peroneal tears had diminished ankle sagittal motion (mean 23.14 vs 24.30 degrees, P = .012), ankle/hindfoot axial rotation (6.26 vs 7.23 degrees, P = .001), sagittal moment (1.16 vs 1.29 Nm/kg, P < .001), and sagittal power (1.24 vs 1.47 W/kg, P < .001). The most severe tear patterns had the greatest derangements in multiple parameters of gait (PBI+PLI > PBI or PLI > PBR). For example, all groups except PBR had loss of ankle sagittal moment and/or power in the affected limb, and the greatest losses in moment and power were in the PBI+PLI group (1.22 vs 0.91 Nm/kg, P = .003 for moment; 0.73 vs 1.31 W/kg, P < .001 for power). The PBI+PLI group had a >10-degree varus shift in coronal motion on the affected side ( P = .002). Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate diminished biomechanical function in patients with peroneal tendon tears. In vivo 3-dimensional gait analysis found significant changes in hindfoot motion, ankle motion, and ankle power. Impairments were related to the pattern and severity of the tears, and demonstrated a strong association of peroneal tendon tears with diminished ankle plantarflexion strength. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Does intraoperative mechanical prophylaxis prevent venous thromboembolism in total knee arthroplasty? – effectiveness of passive-assisted ankle motion in surgical/non-surgical side

Background Gradual compression stocking (GCS) and intermittent pneumatic compression device (IPCD) are used for intraoperative mechanical prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this study, we applied a passive-assisted ankle motion in combination with GCS and IPCD during TKA and evaluated its effectiveness in preventing postoperative VTE. Methods We included 77 patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA. Patients were divided into group A (53 patients who underwent GCS and IPCD on their non-surgical side limb) and group B (24 patients who underwent passive ankle dorsiflexion motion in addition to GCS and IPCD on their non-surgical side limb). Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was assessed using lower extremity ultrasonography (US). The incidence of VTE in each affected limb was compared between the two groups. Results US was performed 4 days after surgery on average. The incidence of DVT in groups A and B was 47.2 and 70.8 %, respectively. In group A, 22.6 % of DVTs were found only on the surgical side, 11.3 % on the non-surgical side, and 13.2 % on both sides. On the other hand, in group B, 41.7 % of DVTs were found only on the surgical side, 4.2 % on the non-surgical side, and 25.0 % on both sides. No significant difference in the incidence of VTE was noted between the 2 groups. Conclusions The intraoperative application of passive ankle motion plus GCS and IPCD might not further reduce the incidence of postoperative DVT in TKA patients.

APPLICATION OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN EVALUATING ANKLE MOTION INJURY

ABSTRACT Introduction Discuss the application of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating ankle motion injury. Objective Verify the influencing factors of magnetic resource imaging (MRI) diagnosis based on the linear regression algorithm model. Methods The experimental group was diagnosed by MRI, while the control group was diagnosed by plain X-ray. After that, the mathematical model of the linear regression algorithm was constructed. Results It could be concluded that the MRI detection rate was 85.71%, and the X-ray plain film detection rate was 77.14%. The linear regression model analysis showed that the P-value of cartilage injury, tendon fracture, bone contusion, and soft tissue swelling was greater than 0.05. Conclusions MRI has more advantages in the application of ankle joint diagnosis. And ligament injury and joint effusion are the influencing factors of MRI diagnosis, which can highly indicate the authenticity of the injury in the ankle joint. Level of evidence II; Therapeutic studies - investigation of treatment results.

The Turmell-Meter: In Vivo Ankle Kinematics by Using Draw-Wire and Inertial Sensors

Objective: To implement a prototype specific for human ankle kinematics studies in limited spaces, immobile, or lying down patients. Based on anatomy and anthropometry, using a screw theory model, draw-wire and inertial sensors were employed Methods: We included ankle injury studies to highlight the importance of measuring the in vivo range of motion; we studied the ankle anatomy, biomechanics, and anthropometry to estimate the size and movements of the device. We simulated the biaxial representation of ankle motion through the product of exponential mapping. Finally, we designed a structure based on trilateration by projecting tetrahedrons, an acquisition circuit with firmware and calibration software. Results: The prototype has two main parts: support and adjustable platform. We proposed a method to find the position by projecting three apexes on the base using draw-wire sensors, an acquisition board, a single-board computer, a display, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and two inertial measurement units. The power source had battery backup with boost and buck converters. Conclusion: We proposed an ankle model in the screw theory framework, a method for localization, and a novel device for in vivo measurements specific for lying patients on a bed, the ground, outdoors, or remote locations without complex setups. The double-battery management is robust and long lasting. Significance: The device is an alternative for measuring the range of motion in laying down patients. We will use it in modeling, diagnosis, and rehabilitation.<br>

The Turmell-Meter: In Vivo Ankle Kinematics by Using Draw-Wire and Inertial Sensors

Objective: To implement a prototype specific for human ankle kinematics studies in limited spaces, immobile, or lying down patients. Based on anatomy and anthropometry, using a screw theory model, draw-wire and inertial sensors were employed Methods: We included ankle injury studies to highlight the importance of measuring the in vivo range of motion; we studied the ankle anatomy, biomechanics, and anthropometry to estimate the size and movements of the device. We simulated the biaxial representation of ankle motion through the product of exponential mapping. Finally, we designed a structure based on trilateration by projecting tetrahedrons, an acquisition circuit with firmware and calibration software. Results: The prototype has two main parts: support and adjustable platform. We proposed a method to find the position by projecting three apexes on the base using draw-wire sensors, an acquisition board, a single-board computer, a display, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and two inertial measurement units. The power source had battery backup with boost and buck converters. Conclusion: We proposed an ankle model in the screw theory framework, a method for localization, and a novel device for in vivo measurements specific for lying patients on a bed, the ground, outdoors, or remote locations without complex setups. The double-battery management is robust and long lasting. Significance: The device is an alternative for measuring the range of motion in laying down patients. We will use it in modeling, diagnosis, and rehabilitation.<br>