orphan status
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

45
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 32, 34, 36-37
Author(s):  
Missag Hagop Parseghian
Keyword(s):  

PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e11394
Author(s):  
Mikel Delgado ◽  
C.A. Tony Buffington ◽  
Melissa Bain ◽  
Dana L. Smith ◽  
Karen Vernau

Objective Studies of multiple species have found that adverse early life experiences, including childhood trauma and maternal separation, can result in accelerated telomere shortening. The objective of this study was to determine if premature separation from the mother affected telomere length in domestic kittens (Felis catus). Subjects were 42 orphaned kittens and 10 mother-reared kittens from local animal rescue groups and shelters. DNA was extracted from whole blood collected from kittens at approximately 1 week and 2 months of age. Telomere length was assessed by qPCR (quantitative polymerase chain reaction) from a total of 86 samples and expressed as a ratio of telomere PCR relative to a single copy gene PCR (T/S). Results A generalized linear mixed model found there were no detectable differences in telomere length based on survival (F1, 76.2 = 3.35, p = 0.07), orphan status (F1, 56.5 = 0.44, p = 0.51), time point (F1, 43.5 = 0.19, p = 0.67), or the interaction between orphan status and time (F1, 43.5 = 0.86, p = 0.36). Although in other species telomere shortening is commonly associated with aging, even early in life, we did not find evidence for telomere shortening by two months of age. Our results suggest that the experience of early maternal separation in domestic cats who are subsequently hand-reared by humans does not accelerate telomere shortening compared to mother-reared kittens, at least in the first few months of life.


Author(s):  
A. G. Solodovnikov ◽  
E. Yu. Sorokina ◽  
E. I. Morkovin

Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), or primary immune thrombocytopenia, is an orphan disease associated with thrombocytopenia. One of the most recent and promising approaches to ITP treatment is the use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs). The scope of TPO-RA use is expanding rapidly, which stimulates the development of both innovator and generic (or biosimilar) medicines. The aim of the paper was to assess TPO-RA role in ITP treatment, methodological approaches to TPO-RA development, and feasibility of using the platelet count as a pharmacodynamic marker in bioequivalence studies of peptide TPO-RAs in healthy volunteers. Clinical development of new medicines for the treatment of thrombocytopenia includes comparative, parallel-group trials lasting about a year. The standard approach to bioequivalence studies, which is based on the results of comparative pharmacokinetic studies, can be used in marketing authorisation applications for generic non-peptide TPO agonists, while peptide TPO agonists have to comply with specific requirements for biosimilar products. The orphan status of ITP does not affect the development strategy and study design, but it limits the number of patients that could be included into the study. In the absence of valid surrogate biomarkers of efficacy, demonstration of comparable clinical efficacy of the biosimilar and reference drug is usually required in a randomised, parallel, preferably double-blind comparative study. On the other hand, clinical comparability of the biosimilar and reference drug can also be demonstrated in comparative pharmacodynamic studies, if the selected biomarker is a well-established and valid surrogate marker which correlates with patient clinical outcome. Platelet count is a key parameter in both diagnosis of diseases associated with low platelet levels and assessment of treatment efficacy. Therefore, it can be used as a pharmacodynamic marker in bioequivalence studies of biosimilar peptide TPO-RAs. It was concluded that such studies could be performed in healthy volunteers, and not in patients, whose participation in clinical trials is limited due to the orphan status of ITP.


2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 488
Author(s):  
Cameron Adler
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S792
Author(s):  
A. Lee ◽  
S. Tan ◽  
C. Usher ◽  
M. Barry ◽  
L. McCullagh
Keyword(s):  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e028634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Noëlle Vokinger ◽  
Aaron S Kesselheim

ObjectiveTo determine differences in the characteristics of cancer drugs designated as orphan drugs by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA).Design and settingIdentification of all cancer drugs (initial or supplementary indication) with orphan status approved by the FDA between 2008–2017 based on publicly accessible reports. The European public assessment reports (EPAR) was searched to determine whether these FDA-approved drugs were also approved by the EMA.Main outcome measuresExtraction of active ingredient, trade name, approval date and approved indication from two FDA data sources (Orphan Drug Product Designation Database, Drugs@FDA) and comparison with the same data from EPAR.ResultsThe FDA approved 135 cancer drugs with orphan indications that met our inclusion criteria, of which 101 (75%) were also approved by the EMA. 80/101 (79%) were first approved in the USA. Only 41/101 (41%) also received orphan designation by the EMA. 33/101 (33%) were approved for biomarker-based indications in the USA, however, only nine approved cancer drug indications by the EMA were biomarker-derived drugs. 78% (47/60) of approved cancer drugs that were only approved in the USA with orphan status were indicated for solid tumours, 22% (13/60) had indications for non-solid tumours. By contrast, out of those approved cancer drugs that received orphan designation by both agencies, 20% (8/41) were indicated for solid, and 80% (33/41) for non-solid tumours.ConclusionsOrphan designation was intended to encourage drug development for rare conditions. This study shows that the FDA approves more cancer drugs with such designations compared with the EMA, especially for subgroups of more prevalent cancers. One reason for the difference could be that the European Union requires demonstration of significant benefit for drugs that target the same indication as a drug already on the market to earn the orphan designation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P.H. Alexander ◽  
Andrew J. Irving

GPR18, GPR55 and GPR119 (provisional nomenclature), although showing little structural similarity to CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors, respond to endogenous agents analogous to the endogenous cannabinoid ligands, as well as some natural/synthetic cannabinoid receptor ligands [98]. Although there are multiple reports to indicate that GPR18, GPR55 and GPR119 can be activated in vitro by N-arachidonoylglycine, lysophosphatidylinositol and N-oleoylethanolamide, respectively, there is a lack of evidence for activation by these lipid messengers in vivo. As such, therefore, these receptors retain their orphan status.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfiana Yuli Efiyanti ◽  
Esa Nur Wahyuni

Young generation, especially teenagers, plays a very important role in the nation's sustainability. However, it becomes hard situation for orphan teenagers as they live in abnormal situations. In Sendang Biru, Sumbermanjing Wetan Malang, orphan  teenagers experience problems that occur due to their orphan status.  There are various social problems, that relating to economic and psychological problems.  Continuously attention and assistance has been provided by the community through the social community “An Nisa”.  However, because the assistance is short-term and momentary, it only touches a small number of problems faced, and has not touched other psychological and social domains.  We strongly recommend Sendang Biru community, government and higher education institutions to develop long-term programs that can solve the whole problems of orphan teenagers in Sendang Biru.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document