refractory multiple myeloma
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1938
(FIVE YEARS 763)

H-INDEX

79
(FIVE YEARS 18)

eJHaem ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Fazio ◽  
Luca Franceschini ◽  
Valeria Tomarchio ◽  
Angela Rago ◽  
Maria Grazia Garzia ◽  
...  

Leukemia ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes M. Waldschmidt ◽  
Andrew J. Yee ◽  
Tushara Vijaykumar ◽  
Ricardo A. Pinto ◽  
Julia Frede ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
José-Ángel Hernández-Rivas ◽  
Rafael Ríos-Tamayo ◽  
Cristina Encinas ◽  
Rafael Alonso ◽  
Juan-José Lahuerta

AbstractThe increase in the number of therapeutic alternatives for both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients has widened the clinical scenario, leading to a level of complexity that no algorithm has been able to cover up to date. At present, this complexity increases due to the wide variety of clinical situations found in MM patients before they reach the status of relapsed/refractory disease. These different backgrounds may include primary refractoriness, early relapse after completion of first-line therapy with latest-generation agents, or very late relapse after chemotherapy or autologous transplantation. It is also important to bear in mind that many patient profiles are not fully represented in the main randomized clinical trials (RCT), and this further complicates treatment decision-making. In RRMM patients, the choice of previously unused drugs and the number and duration of previous therapeutic regimens until progression has a greater impact on treatment efficacy than the adverse biological characteristics of MM itself. In addition to proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, anti-CD38 antibodies and corticosteroids, a new generation of drugs such as XPO inhibitors, BCL-2 inhibitors, new alkylators and, above all, immunotherapy based on conjugated anti-BCMA antibodies and CAR-T cells, have been developed to fight RRMM. This comprehensive review addresses the fundamentals and controversies regarding RRMM, and discusses the main aspects of management and treatment. The basis for the clinical management of RRMM (complexity of clinical scenarios, key factors to consider before choosing an appropriate treatment, or when to treat), the arsenal of new drugs with no cross resistance with previously administered standard first line regimens (main phase 3 clinical trials), the future outlook including the usefulness of abandoned resources, together with the controversies surrounding the clinical management of RRMM patients will be reviewed in detail.


Author(s):  
Jiadai Xu ◽  
Yue Wang ◽  
Zheng Wei ◽  
Jingli Zhuang ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
...  

This study attempted to investigate how clonal structure evolves, along with potential regulatory networks, as a result of multiline therapies in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Eight whole exome sequencing (WES) and one single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) were performed in order to assess dynamic genomic changes in temporal consecutive samples of one RRMM patient from the time of diagnosis to death (about 37 months). The 63-year-old female patient who suffered from MM (P1) had disease progression (PD) nine times from July 2017 [newly diagnosed (ND)] to Aug 2020 (death), and the force to drive branching-pattern evolution of malignant PCs was found to be sustained. The mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH) and tumor mutation burden (TMB) initially exhibited a downward trend, which was then upward throughout the course of the disease. Various somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) that had disappeared after the previous treatment were observed to reappear in later stages. Chromosomal instability (CIN) and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores were observed to be increased during periods of all progression, especially in the period of extramedullary plasmacytoma. Finally, in combination with WES and scRNA-seq of P1-PD9 (the nineth PD), the intro-heterogeneity and gene regulatory networks of MM cells were deciphered. As verified by the overall survival of MM patients in the MMRF CoMMpass and GSE24080 datasets, RUNX3 was identified as a potential driver for RRMM.


Author(s):  
Yuanyan Tang ◽  
Haisen Yin ◽  
Xinying Zhao ◽  
Dan Jin ◽  
Yan Liang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has obtained promising results in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM), while some patients do not response, or relapse in short term after treatment. Combining with anti-CD38 might solve the problem of targeting BCMA alone. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of BCMA and CD38 (BCMA-CD38) bispecific CAR-T cells in R/R MM patients. Methods We did a single-center, single-arm clinical study at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University in China. Patients meeting with the inclusion criteria were administered with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide before CAR-T cells infusion. Response and adverse events were assessed after infusion. This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR1900026286). Results First, we found BCMA-CD38 CAR-T cells exhibited enhanced killing effect on BCMA+CD38+ cells in vitro, compared to BCMA CAR-T and CD38 CAR-T cells. We further demonstrated its anti-tumor activity in vivo. Then, we enrolled 16 R/R MM patients for safety and efficacy analyses. Of the 16 evaluable patients, 14 (87.5%) respond to the treatment, including 13 stringent complete response (sCR) and one partial response (PR), while two patients did not respond. At a median follow-up of 11.5 months, of the 13 patients who achieved sCR, 76.9% (10/13) did not relapse or progress during follow-up. Relapse occurred in 3 patients (Patient 2, 3 and 4) after achieving sCR. In sum, four patients died, of which one died of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis syndrome secondary to severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and three died of disease progression or relapse. The 1-year progression-free survival rates was 68.8%. The 1-year overall survival rate was 75.0%. Extramedullary lesions were eliminated in 62.5% (5/8) patients. The most common symptoms after CAR-T infusion were cytopenia (16, 100%), fever (10, 62.5%), fatigue (8, 50.0%) and myalgias (8, 50.0%). Twelve patients (75.0%) were observed with various grades of CRS, of which five patients (31.3%) got serious CRS (Grade ≥ 3). The CAR+ cell expansion levels were associated with the severity of CRS. Transient clonal isotype switch was observed after CAR-T infusion. Conclusion Our results confirm that BCMA-CD38 CAR-T cells therapy is feasible in treating R/R MM patients, with high response rate, low recurrence rate and manageable CRS, which will be a promising treatment option for R/R MM. Trial registration ChiCTR1900026286, registered on September 29, 2019, retrospectively registered, URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=43805


2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110583
Author(s):  
Jeremiah K. Jessee

Objective: The objective of this article was to review existing data of melflufen (Pepaxto) as an additional treatment option for heavily pretreated relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Data sources: A PubMed search was completed using the search terms melphalan flufenamide; melflufen; melflufen AND relapsed refractory multiple myeloma; melphalan flufenamide and relapsed refractory multiple myeloma between January 1, 2013, and October 18, 2021. Additional information was obtained from the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trial Registry, Federal Drug Administration (FDA) web updates, and Pepaxto prescribing information. Study selection/data extraction: Clinical trials including melflufen in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma and trials related to safety and clinical pharmacology were included. Data synthesis: The findings of this review show melflufen in combination with dexamethasone can be used as a treatment option for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have previously received greater than 4 previous lines of therapy, and documented resistance to a proteosome inhibitor, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, and an immunomodulator. Relevance to patient care and clinical practice: Melflufen in combination with dexamethasone is a reasonable option for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least 4 previous lines of therapy and considered ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant. Further clinical utilization in earlier lines of therapy is under review, pending the in-depth safety analysis by the FDA. Conclusions: The FDA approval of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone provides an additional therapy option for patients with heavily pretreated relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document