relative direction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

39
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Chang-Ling Hsu ◽  
Yen-Ju Tsai ◽  
Ray-I Chang

Emerging applications for an online sign language dictionary require that retrieval systems retrieve a target vocabulary through visual symbols. However, when people encounter an unknown vocabulary in sign language during communication, they require the online dictionary to retrieve the vocabulary with higher recall-rate and smaller-sized graph through a mobile device. Still, three situations show that the current online dictionary needs an extension. First, previous works lack of retrieving the target graph of a vocabulary through its complete visual symbol-portfolio. Secondly, they often respond a large number of possible images; however, their precisions and recall rates remain very low. Thirdly, previous works of sign language gloves can convert the visual symbols into the graphic features, but only part of the symbols, ignoring the symbols of expression and relative direction. Therefore, the aim of this study is, based on Taiwanese Sign Language, to design a new graph retrieval architecture for sign-language (GRAS), and to implement a new graph retrieval system for sign-language (GRSS) based on this architecture. Finally, we invite users to evaluate GRSS. The experimental results show that GRSS gets convincing performance. And, GRSS adopting RDF technology can improve the performance of GRSS without adopting RDF technology.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deqing Kong ◽  
Zheng Zhao ◽  
Xiaogang Shi ◽  
Xiaojun Li ◽  
Bingjie Wang ◽  
...  

Cognition ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 209 ◽  
pp. 104559
Author(s):  
Phillip M. Newman ◽  
Gregory E. Cox ◽  
Timothy P. McNamara

Author(s):  
Holger Schultheis

Abstract A common assumption about spatial memory is that it is organized along one or more reference directions such that access to memory is easier along directions aligned with the reference direction(s). This assumption rests to no small part on frequently replicated alignment effects arising in judgment of relative direction. In this contribution, we report an experiment designed to investigate a possible alternative explanation of alignment effects. By contrasting performance in a judgment of relative direction task with performance in an ego perspective taking task, we tested to what extent alignment effects arise from encoding of relations in addition to or instead of from organization along reference directions. Experimental results suggest little if any contribution of relation encoding on alignment effects, thus lending further support to the assumption of reference directions in spatial memory. Data from both tasks yielded the same alignment effects and provided evidence for a single direction being encoded in memory. Moreover, our results shed new light on and raise questions concerning differential sensorimotor and cognitive influence on spatial memory use. While both influence memory use, systematic bias seems to arise solely from reference directions, along which memory is organized.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Yankun Wang ◽  
Weixi Wang ◽  
Xiaoming Li ◽  
Shengjun Tang ◽  
You Li

<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Geographic information sciences (GIS) have been entering an era of information explosion. The data-related geographic can be divided into many classes, according to their sources and format, such as raster dataset, shape file, textual information, and voice. Locality description, which is a common form of voice, conveys considerable spatial information and can be derived from our daily communication. The issue of dealing with the locality description information is a research hot spot of next-generation GIS for many scholars.</p><p>Locality description reflects direct or indirect human interaction with environment directly. As an external expression of cognition, the uncertainty that is associated with locality description is inevitable. Locality description generally contains spatial relationships (i.e., topological, distance, and direction relations) and reference objects (ROs). Any feature with a name can be regarded as an RO. Topological relations, which convey rough information-related locality and can be refined by distance or direction relations, are seldom used directly in locality description positioning. The distance and direction relations are usually combined to describe locality, which conveys many clues to position locality.</p><p>Humans have a weak sense of direction indoors, and relative directions are used frequently in locality description. For example, locality description indoors can be given as follows: “Object A is in front of me, and object B is on my left. Context is an unavoidable topic of Locality description. The locality description is complex, either explicitly or implicitly, especially in a landmark reference system (i.e., a reference system where people can describe his locality with one or several landmarks), in which the nearest landmark can be selected easily to describe locality. On the basis of this context, the locality description (“Object A is in front of me, and object B is on my left”) stated above in an indoor landmark reference system (ILRS) implies that objects A and B are near the individual. Hence, the meaning of “Object A is in front of me, and object B is on my left” in ILRS is the same as that of “Object A is in front of me, object B is on my left, and they are all near to me”.</p><p>This paper introduces a novel method of positioning localities indoors by using locality description in ILRS. To achieve positioning of localities with directions description and context in ILRS, we propose a joint probability function that consists of qualitative distance (i.e., near relation) and relative direction membership function. The qualitative distance membership function that considers both minimum Euclidean distance and the stolen area is based on fuzzy set. For consistency with cognition, some definitions are provided during the calculation of relative direction, which can also reduce the number of points to be explored from an algorithmic point of view.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1215-1230
Author(s):  
Danit Geva ◽  
Avishai Henik

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek J. Huffman ◽  
Arne D. Ekstrom

AbstractWe present a detailed analysis of a widely used assay in human spatial cognition, the judgments of relative direction (JRD) task. We conducted three experiments involving virtual navigation interspersed with the JRD task, and included confidence judgments and map drawing as additional metrics. We also present a technique for assessing the similarity of the cognitive representations underlying performance on the JRD and map drawing tasks. Our results support the construct validity of the JRD task and its connection to allocentric representation. Additionally, we found that chance performance on the JRD task depends on the distribution of the angles of participants’ responses, rather than being constant and 90 degrees. Accordingly, we present a method for better determining chance performance.


Author(s):  
S. Rayhan Kabir ◽  
Mirza Mohtashim Alam ◽  
Shaikh Muhammad Allayear ◽  
Md Tahsir Ahmed Munna ◽  
Syeda Sumbul Hossain ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document