A comparative discussion of incisional methods in total capsulectomy of the breast

Background Capsular contracture is a frequent complication of breast augmentation that constitutes one of the most common reasons for secondary operations. Capsular contracture is treated surgically, often with total capsulectomy. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to study correlations among intraoperative observations, physical examination findings, and characteristics of the previous operation in patients with capsular contracture who underwent total capsulectomy.Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients treated from May 2017 to April 2019, analyzing 24 breasts in 12 female patients. The patients were classified in terms of the Baker grade, incision type, implant type, and implant plane. During the operation, we evaluated the ease of dissection based on intraoperative features such as anterior and posterior wall dissection, bleeding tendency, and scar length. Statistical analysis was performed to identify association between variablesResults The implant was changed in eight patients, while only explantation was performed in the remaining four patients. The ease of capsule dissection had a proportional correlation with the Baker grade (P=0.005). Intraoperative dissection was significantly easier in the inframammary fold (IMF) group than in the periareolar group (P=0.035).Conclusions An IMF incision is preferable for planning en bloc capsulectomy. However, for aesthetic concerns, a periareolar incision would be preferable. In addition, a lower Baker grade (grade I or II) was associated with easier dissection. Therefore, surgeons should choose the incision type depending on the necessity of performing en bloc capsulectomy, Baker grade, and scar length.

A comparative discussion of incisional methods in total capsulectomy of the breast

Background Capsular contracture is a frequent complication of breast augmentation that constitutes one of the most common reasons for secondary operations. Capsular contracture is treated surgically, often with total capsulectomy. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to study correlations among intraoperative observations, physical examination findings, and characteristics of the previous operation in patients with capsular contracture who underwent total capsulectomy.Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients treated from May 2017 to April 2019, analyzing 24 breasts in 12 female patients. The patients were classified in terms of the Baker grade, incision type, implant type, and implant plane. During the operation, we evaluated the ease of dissection based on intraoperative features such as anterior and posterior wall dissection, bleeding tendency, and scar length. Statistical analysis was performed to identify association between variablesResults The implant was changed in eight patients, while only explantation was performed in the remaining four patients. The ease of capsule dissection had a proportional correlation with the Baker grade (P=0.005). Intraoperative dissection was significantly easier in the inframammary fold (IMF) group than in the periareolar group (P=0.035).Conclusions An IMF incision is preferable for planning en bloc capsulectomy. However, for aesthetic concerns, a periareolar incision would be preferable. In addition, a lower Baker grade (grade I or II) was associated with easier dissection. Therefore, surgeons should choose the incision type depending on the necessity of performing en bloc capsulectomy, Baker grade, and scar length.

Surgical management of gynaecomastia by using cross chest liposuction and limited periareolar incision for gland excision: an interesting case report

Gynaecomastia is excessive or abnormal enlargement of male breast tissue. It is one of a common problem among young men. The term gynaecomastia means female like enlargement of male breast due to increase ductal tissue, stroma or fat. Most common cause of gynaecomastia is idiopathic. Surgical treatment of gynaecomastia involves liposuction and glandular excision and in few cases skin excision. Here author presents a case of 24 years old young healthy male with Simon’s grade 2B bilateral gynaecomastia. He had stubborn fat over bilateral chest which was resistant to exercise. Gynaecomastia was mixed type in characteristic having adipose tissue as well as glandular tissue enlargement. Bilateral liposuction and glandular excision by limited periareolar incision under general anesthesia as a day care procedure was done. In our procedure we used Cross chest liposuction. Patient was discharged at the same evening without any complications. After four months of follow up patient has male pattern chest with almost invisible scar and intact Nipple areolar complex (NAC) sensation.

Modified Techniques Versus Hadfield’s Procedure in Patients With Periductal Mastitis

Background: Periductal mastitis (PM) is a rare disease characterized by chronic inflammation of the terminal mammary ducts. Complete removal of the terminal canals with Hadfield’s operation applied in the treatment carries various complication risks. This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of modified techniques and compare them with the Hadfield operation.Methods: Twenty women who underwent surgery due to PM between January 2012 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Types of PM were determined. All patients were operated on with three different incisions (Hadfield’s operation with periareolar incision, periareolar combined with radial incision, and round block incision). Results: The age mean 37.5±6.5 years (range:24-49). Sixty percent of patients had type three PM. For the affected duct excision, a classic Hadfield’s operation with periareolar incision was performed in 11 patients, periareolar incision combined with radial incision was performed in 7 patients. The round block method was performed on two patients. Seroma was observed in only one of the patients who underwent the modified technique. In Hadfield’s procedure, NAC retraction (n:2), seroma (n:1), and hematoma (n:1) were seen. The follow-up period was 12±1.5 months. Recurrence occurred in two patients, and both had Hadfield’s procedures. Conclusions: The main principle of surgical treatment is excision of the affected canal with a clear margin. In PM treatment, The round block method and periareolar incision combined radial incision modifications of the Hadfield procedure reduce complications and recurrence risk.