A machine learning pipeline for fuel-economical driving model

PurposeA cost-effective way to achieve fuel economy is to reinforce positive driving behaviour. Driving behaviour can be controlled if drivers can be alerted for behaviour that results in poor fuel economy. Fuel consumption must be tracked and monitored instantaneously rather than tracking average fuel economy for the entire trip duration. A single-step application of machine learning (ML) is not sufficient to model prediction of instantaneous fuel consumption and detection of anomalous fuel economy. The study designs an ML pipeline to track and monitor instantaneous fuel economy and detect anomalies.Design/methodology/approachThis research iteratively applies different variations of a two-step ML pipeline to the driving dataset for hatchback cars. The first step addresses the problem of accurate measurement and prediction of fuel economy using time series driving data, and the second step detects abnormal fuel economy in relation to contextual information. Long short-term memory autoencoder method learns and uses the most salient features of time series data to build a regression model. The contextual anomaly is detected by following two approaches, kernel quantile estimator and one-class support vector machine. The kernel quantile estimator sets dynamic threshold for detecting anomalous behaviour. Any error beyond a threshold is classified as an anomaly. The one-class support vector machine learns training error pattern and applies the model to test data for anomaly detection. The two-step ML pipeline is further modified by replacing long short term memory autoencoder with gated recurrent network autoencoder, and the performance of both models is compared. The speed recommendations and feedback are issued to the driver based on detected anomalies for controlling aggressive behaviour.FindingsA composite long short-term memory autoencoder was compared with gated recurrent unit autoencoder. Both models achieve prediction accuracy within a range of 98%–100% for prediction as a first step. Recall and accuracy metrics for anomaly detection using kernel quantile estimator remains within 98%–100%, whereas the one-class support vector machine approach performs within the range of 99.3%–100%.Research limitations/implicationsThe proposed approach does not consider socio-demographics or physiological information of drivers due to privacy concerns. However, it can be extended to correlate driver's physiological state such as fatigue, sleep and stress to correlate with driving behaviour and fuel economy. The anomaly detection approach here is limited to providing feedback to driver, it can be extended to give contextual feedback to the steering controller or throttle controller. In the future, a controller-based system can be associated with an anomaly detection approach to control the acceleration and braking action of the driver.Practical implicationsThe suggested approach is helpful in monitoring and reinforcing fuel-economical driving behaviour among fleet drivers as per different environmental contexts. It can also be used as a training tool for improving driving efficiency for new drivers. It keeps drivers engaged positively by issuing a relevant warning for significant contextual anomalies and avoids issuing a warning for minor operational errors.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the existing literature by providing an ML pipeline approach to track and monitor instantaneous fuel economy rather than relying on average fuel economy values. The approach is further extended to detect contextual driving behaviour anomalies and optimises fuel economy. The main contributions for this approach are as follows: (1) a prediction model is applied to fine-grained time series driving data to predict instantaneous fuel consumption. (2) Anomalous fuel economy is detected by comparing prediction error against a threshold and analysing error patterns based on contextual information.

Cognitive Biases, Risk Perception, and Risky Driving Behaviour

This study evaluated the relationship between drivers’ cognitive biases (i.e., optimism bias, illusion of control) and risky driving behaviour. It also investigated the mediational role of risk perception in the relationship between cognitive biases and self-reported risky driving. The sample included 366 drivers (Mage = 39.13, SD = 13.63 years) who completed scales measuring optimism bias, illusion of control, risk perception, and risky driving behaviour, as well as demographic information. The results showed that risky driving behaviour was negatively predicted by optimism bias and positively predicted by the illusion of control. Further, risk perception negatively correlated with risky behaviour and also mediated the relation between both optimism bias and illusion of control with risky driving. The practical implications of these results for traffic safety and future research are discussed.

Classification of Bus Driving Behaviour In Universiti Malaysia Sabah Campus

Driving behaviour has been studied by numerous researchers for the past few years. It includes the instantaneous driving behaviour observations and the drivers speed which are said to be influenced by many factors, such as the demographic measure of the drivers, environmental, passenger effect, and road characteristics. This paper describes the recent analysis and classification of driver behaviour in actual driving scenarios among the bus drivers in Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS) Main Campus, Kota Kinabalu. This research focussed on determining the riderships of bus in UMS campus, to investigate the differences of instantaneous driving behaviours of bus drivers during the acceleration phase when leaving bus stops, and to poduce the classification of the bus driving behaviour in UMS based on the driver’s accelerations. In order to achieve the objective of this study, observations were made for determining the riderships and the differences in instantaneous bus driving behaviour several times for each bus stops. For drivers speed and accelerations, a mobile applications called Speedometer GPS was used to obtain the data. Interview was conducted to a total number of 10 respondents to obtain their demographic measure. The results obtained shows the ridership of UMS bus is the highest in the afternoon peak. The instantaneous driving behaviour produce the head movement as the highest percentage during peak hour, and inattentive behaviour as the highest during the off peak hour. The bus drivers in UMS were classified as Aggressive and Calm Behaviour Category.

The Multiple Object Avoidance (MOA) task measures attention for action: Evidence from driving and sport

Performance in everyday tasks, such as driving and sport, requires allocation of attention to task-relevant information and the ability to inhibit task-irrelevant information. Yet there are individual differences in this attentional function ability. This research investigates a novel task for measuring attention for action, called the Multiple Object Avoidance task (MOA), in its relation to the everyday tasks of driving and sport. The aim in Study 1 was to explore the efficacy of the MOA task to predict simulated driving behaviour and hazard perception. Whilst also investigating its test–retest reliability and how it correlates to self-report driving measures. We found that superior performance in the MOA task predicted simulated driving performance in complex environments and was superior at predicting performance compared to the Useful Field of View task. We found a moderate test–retest reliability and a correlation between the attentional lapses subscale of the Driving Behaviour Questionnaire. Study 2 investigated the discriminative power of the MOA in sport by exploring performance differences in those that do and do not play sports. We also investigated if the MOA shared attentional elements with other measures of visual attention commonly attributed to sporting expertise: Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) and cognitive processing speed. We found that those that played sports exhibited superior MOA performance and found a positive relationship between MOA performance and Multiple Object Tracking performance and cognitive processing speed. Collectively, this research highlights the utility of the MOA when investigating visual attention in everyday contexts.